Leveraging attention-based deep neural networks for security vetting of Android applications

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-9-2021.171168

Keywords:

Android Apps, Android Security, Malware Detection, Deep Neural Networks, Attention

Abstract

Many traditional machine learning and deep learning algorithms work as a black box and lack interpretability. Attention-based mechanisms can be used to address the interpretability of such models by providing insights into the features that a model uses to make its decisions. Recent success of attention-based mechanisms in natural language processing motivates us to apply the idea for security vetting of Android apps. An Android app’s code contains API-calls that can provide clues regarding the malicious or benign nature of an app. By observing the pattern of the API-calls being invoked, we can interpret the predictions of a model trained to separate benign apps from malicious apps. In this paper, using the attention mechanism, we aim to find the API-calls that are predictive with respect to the maliciousness of Android apps. More specifically, we target to identify a set of API-calls that malicious apps exploit, which might help the community discover new signatures of malware. In our experiment, we work with two attention-based models: Bi-LSTM Attention and Self-Attention. Our classification models achieve high accuracy in malware detection. Using the attention weights, we also extract the top 200 API-calls (that reflect the malicious behavior of the apps) from each of these two models, and we observe that there is significant overlap between the top 200 API-calls identified by the two models. This result increases our confidence that the top 200 API-calls can be used to improve the interpretability of the models.

Downloads

Published

27-09-2021

How to Cite

Pathak, P. ., Poudel, P. ., Roy, S. ., & Caragea, D. . (2021). Leveraging attention-based deep neural networks for security vetting of Android applications. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Security and Safety, 8(29), e2. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-9-2021.171168

Funding data