Proposed hybrid Model in Online Education

Authors

  • Veena Grover Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology
  • Manju Nandal Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology
  • Balamurugan Balusamy Shiv Nadar University image/svg+xml
  • Divya Sahu Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology
  • Mahima Dogra Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/eetiot.4770

Keywords:

online learning, technology, decision tree, machine learning, teaching, logistic regression, accuracy

Abstract

The advancement of technology powering e-learning has brought numerous benefits, including consistency, scalability, cost reduction, and improved usability. However, there are also challenges that need to be addressed. Here are some key considerations for enhancing the technology powering e-learning. Artificial intelligence has revolutionized the field of e-learning and created tremendous opportunities for education Storage, servers, software systems, databases, online management systems, and apps are examples of such resources. This paper aims to forecast students' adaptability to online education using predictive machine learning (ML) models, including Logistic Regression, Decision tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, ANN. The dataset utilized for this study was sourced from Kaggle and comprised 1205 high school to college students. The research encompasses several stages of data analysis, including data preprocessing, model training, testing, and validation. Multiple performance metrics such as accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, F1 score, and precision were employed to assess the effectiveness of each model. The findings demonstrate that all five models exhibit considerable predictive capabilities. Notably, decision tree and hybrid models outperformed the others, achieving an impressive accuracy rate of 92%. Consequently, it is recommended to utilize these two models, RF and XGB, for predicting students' adaptability levels in online education due to their superior predictive accuracy. Additionally, the Logistic regression, KNN, and AdaBoost, ANN models also yielded respectable performance levels, achieving accuracy rates of 77.48%, 83.77 ,74.17% and 91.06% respectively. In summary, this study underscores the superiority of RF and XGB models in delivering higher prediction accuracy, aligning with similar research endeavours employing ML techniques to forecast adaptability levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
<br data-mce-bogus="1"> <br data-mce-bogus="1">

References

Alhazmi, Abdulsalam K., Fatima Alhammadi, Adnan Abdullah Zain, Ezzadeen Kaed, and Balquis Ahmed. "AI’s Role and Application in Education: Systematic Review." Intelligent Sustainable Systems: Selected Papers of WorldS4 2022, Volume 1 (2023): 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7660-5_1

Chen, Lijia, Pingping Chen, and Zhijian Lin. "Artificial intelligence in education: A review." Ieee Access 8 (2020): 75264-75278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Haenlein, Michael, and Andreas Kaplan. "A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence." California management review 61, no. 4 (2019): 5-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925

Salman, Fatima M., Samy S. Abu-Naser, Eman Alajrami, Bassem S. Abu-Nasser, and Belal AM Alashqar. "Covid-19 detection using artificial intelligence." (2020).

Sorour, Shaymaa E., Tsunenori Mine, Kazumasa Goda, and Sachio Hirokawa. "A predictive model to evaluate student performance." Journal of Information Processing 23, no. 2 (2015): 192-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjjip.23.192

Xu, Weiqi, and Fan Ouyang. "A systematic review of AI role in the educational system based on a proposed conceptual framework." Education and Information Technologies (2022): 1-29.

Yue, Miao, Morris Siu-Yung Jong, and Yun Dai. "Pedagogical design of K-12 artificial intelligence education: A systematic review." Sustainability 14, no. 23 (2022): 15620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315620

Khan, Hina, Jawad Abbas, Kalpina Kumari, and Hina Najam. "Corporate level politics from managers and employee’s perspective and its impact on employees' job stress and job performance." Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences ahead-of-print (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-12-2021-0246

Chaudhry, Muhammad Ali, and Emre Kazim. "Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): A high-level academic and industry note 2021." AI and Ethics (2022): 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3833583

Haleem, Abid, Mohd Javaid, Mohd Asim Qadri, and Rajiv Suman. "Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review." Sustainable Operations and Computers 3 (2022): 275-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Yannier, Nesra, Scott E. Hudson, and Kenneth R. Koedinger. "Active learning is about more than hands-on: A mixed-reality AI system to support STEM education." International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 30 (2020): 74-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00194-3

Wang, Yuzhe. "An improved machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithm for classroom management of English distance education." Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40, no. 2 (2021): 3477-3488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189385

Zhang, Ke, and Ayse Begum Aslan. "AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions." Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2 (2021): 100025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025

Gull, Hina, Madeeha Saqib, Sardar Zafar Iqbal, and Saqib Saeed. "Improving learning experience of students by early prediction of student performance using machine learning." In 2020 IEEE International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON), pp. 1-4. IEEE, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/INOCON50539.2020.9298266

Doleck, Tenzin, David John Lemay, Ram B. Basnet, and Paul Bazelais. "Predictive analytics in education: a comparison of deep learning frameworks." Education and Information Technologies 25 (2020): 1951-1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10068-4

Bell, Benjamin. "Supporting educational software design with knowledge-rich tools." In Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments: Toward Cost-Effective Adaptive, Interactive and Intelligent Educational Software, pp. 341-375. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0819-7_12

Avella, John T., Mansureh Kebritchi, Sandra G. Nunn, and Therese Kanai. "Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review." Online Learning 20, no. 2 (2016): 13-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.790

Doleck, Tenzin, Ram B. Basnet, Eric G. Poitras, and Susanne P. Lajoie. "Mining learner–system interaction data: implications for modeling learner behaviors and improving overlay models." Journal of Computers in Education 2 (2015): 421-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0040-3

Lemay, David John, and Tenzin Doleck. "Grade prediction of weekly assignments in MOOCS: mining video-viewing behavior." Education and Information Technologies 25 (2020): 1333-1342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10022-4

Jordan, Michael I., and Tom M. Mitchell. "Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects." Science 349, no. 6245 (2015): 255-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415

LeCun, Yann, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. "Deep learning." nature 521, no. 7553 (2015): 436-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Kurelović, E. Krelja, S. Rako, and J. Tomljanović. "Cloud computing in education and student's needs." In 2013 36th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), pp. 726-731. IEEE, 2013.

Cavalcanti, Anderson Pinheiro, Rafael Ferreira Leite de Mello, Vitor Rolim, Máverick André, Fred Freitas, and Dragan Gaševic. "An analysis of the use of good feedback practices in online learning courses." In 2019 IEEE 19th international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT), vol. 2161, pp. 153-157. IEEE, 2019.

Uskov, Vladimir L., Jeffrey P. Bakken, Adam Byerly, and Ashok Shah. "Machine learning-based predictive analytics of student academic performance in STEM education." In 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1370-1376. IEEE, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725237

Ezz, Mohamed, and Ayman Elshenawy. "Adaptive recommendation system using machine learning algorithms for predicting student’s best academic program." Education and Information Technologies 25 (2020): 2733-2746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10049-7

Qazi, Atika, Najmul Hasan, Christopher M. Owusu-Ansah, Glenn Hardaker, Samrat Kumar Dey, and Khalid Haruna. "SentiTAM: Sentiments centered integrated framework for mobile learning adaptability in higher education." Heliyon 9, no. 1 (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12705

Al-Shabandar, Raghad, Abir Hussain, Andy Laws, Robert Keight, Janet Lunn, and Naeem Radi. "Machine learning approaches to predict learning outcomes in Massive open online courses." In 2017 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), pp. 713-720. IEEE, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7965922

Tomasevic, Nikola, Nikola Gvozdenovic, and Sanja Vranes. "An overview and comparison of supervised data mining techniques for student exam performance prediction." Computers & education 143 (2020): 103676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103676

Gupta, Awaneesh, Bireshwar Dass Mazumdar, Manmohan Mishra, Priyanka P. Shinde, Surabhi Srivastava, and A. Deepak. "Role of cloud computing in management and education." Materials Today: Proceedings 80 (2023): 3726-3729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.370

Downloads

Published

04-01-2024

How to Cite

[1]
V. Grover, M. Nandal, B. Balusamy, D. Sahu, and M. Dogra, “Proposed hybrid Model in Online Education”, EAI Endorsed Trans IoT, vol. 10, Jan. 2024.