Enhancing Audio Accessory Selection through Multi-Criteria Decision Making using Fuzzy Logic and Machine Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetiot.5364Keywords:
ML Models, Mamdani approach, FLC, MCDM, audio accessoriesAbstract
This research paper aims to investigate the significance of electrical products, specifically earbuds and headphones, in the digital world. The processes of decision-making and purchasing of audio accessories are often characterized by a significant investment of time and effort, as well as a complex interplay of competing priorities. In addition, various methodologies are employed for the selection and procurement of audio equipment through the utilization of machine learning algorithms. This study aimed to gather responses from a diverse group of participants regarding their preferences for the latest functionalities and essential components in their gadgets. The data was collected through a questionnaire that provided multiple options about the specifications of the audio accessories for the participants to choose from. The study employed seven distinct input factors to elicit responses from participants. These factors included brand, type, design, fit, price, noise cancellation, and folding design. The quantification of each input parameter was executed through the utilization of a scaling function in the Fuzzy Logic Interface, which assigned the labels “Yes” or “No” to each parameter. In this study, the Mamdani approach, which is a widely used fuzzy reasoning tool, was employed to develop a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) consisting of seven input and one output processes. In this study, standard fuzzy algorithms were employed to enhance the accuracy of the process of selecting an audio accessory in accordance with the user's specific requirements on the basis of Fuzzy threshold where “Yes” signifies about the availability of such audio accessory and “No” refers to the non-availability and readjustment of the input parameters.
Downloads
References
Jiang J, Chen YW, Tang DW, Chen YW. TOPSIS with belief structure for group belief multiple criteria decision making. international journal of Automation and Computing. 2010 Aug;7(3):359-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-010-0515-7
Hwang CL, Yoon K, Hwang CL, Yoon K. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. 1981:58-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
Shree K, Mohanty S, Mohanty SN. Multi-criteria decision-making for purchasing cell phones using machine learning approach. International Journal of Decision Sciences, Risk and Management. 2017;7(3):190-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJDSRM.2017.10011481
Chen Y, et al. (2005) Res 3(12):669-77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/096973300510.1191/
Mohanty SN, Pratihar DK, Suar D. Influence of mood states on information processing during decision making using fuzzy reasoning tool and neuro-fuzzy system based on Mamdani approach. International Journal of Fuzzy Computation and Modelling. 2015;1(3):252-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFCM.2015.069930
Van Thang D, Mangla M, Satpathy S, Pattnaik CR, Mohanty SN. A fuzzy-based expert system to analyse purchase behaviour under uncertain environment. International Journal of Information Technology. 2021 Jun;13:997-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00615-z
Sankhwar S, Pandey D, Khan RA, Mohanty SN. An anti‐phishing enterprise environ model using feed‐forward backpropagation and Levenberg‐Marquardt method. Security and Privacy. 2021 Jan;4(1):e132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.132
Dyer JS, Fishburn PC, Steuer RE, Wallenius J, Zionts S. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: the next ten years. Management science. 1992 May;38(5):645-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.5.645
Pratihar, D.K. (2008) Soft Computing, Narosa Publishing House., New Delhi, India. Zadeh, L.A. (1965) ‘Fuzzy sets’, Information Control, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp.338–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Zadeh LA. Fuzzy logic= computing with words. IEEE transactions on fuzzy systems. 1996 May;4(2):103-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/91.493904
Analysis of Multi Criteria Decision Making and Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology ISSN No: - 2456 – 2165
Multi Criteria Decision Making For Selecting the Best Laptop IJCTA, 9(36), 2016, pp. 437441
Cococcioni M, Ducange P, Lazzerini B, Marcelloni F. A Pareto-based multi-objective evolutionary approach to the identification of Mamdani fuzzy systems. Soft Computing. 2007 Sep;11:1013-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-007-0150-6
Shao M, Han Z, Sun J, Xiao C, Zhang S, Zhao Y. A review of multi-criteria decision making applications for renewable energy site selection. Renewable Energy. 2020 Sep 1;157:377-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.137
Pattnaik CR, Mohanty SN, Mohanty S, Chatterjee JM, Jana B, Diaz VG. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for purchasing life insurance in India. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics. 2021 Feb 1;10(1):344-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v10i1.2275
Lakshmi TM, Venkatesan VP, Martin A. Identification of a Better Laptop with Conflicting Criteria Using TOPSIS. International Journal of Information Engineering & Electronic Business. 2015 Nov 1;7(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2015.06.05
Hairani H, Anggrawan A, Wathan AI, Abd Latif K, Marzuki K, Zulfikri M. The abstract of thesis classifier by using naive Bayes method. In2021 International Conference on Software Engineering & Computer Systems and 4th International Conference on Computational Science and Information Management (ICSECS-ICOCSIM) 2021 Aug 24 (pp. 312-315). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSECS52883.2021.00063
Eager decision tree," 2017 International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), 2017, pp. 837-840.
Mohan L, Pant J, Suyal P, Kumar A. Support vector machine accuracy improvement with classification. In2020 12th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) 2020 Sep 25 (pp. 477-481). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CICN49253.2020.9242572
Multi criteria Decision Making. Weber C.A., Current J.R., Benton W.C., (1991) "Vendor selection criteria and methods", European Journal of Operational Research 50, pp 2-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 license, which permits unlimited use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.
