Organizational Maturity and its Impacts in Product Development

Authors

  • Bruna Oliveira Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial image/svg+xml
  • Luís Aguiar Polytechnic Institute of Porto , Polytechnic Institute of Porto image/svg+xml
  • Álvaro Gouveia CEI by ZIPOR , CEI by ZIPOR
  • Raul Campilho Polytechnic Institute of Porto image/svg+xml
  • Diogo Sousa Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial image/svg+xml
  • Marco Rodrigues Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial image/svg+xml
  • Flávia Barbosa Associate Laboratory of Energy, Transports and Aerospace image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/dtip.10203

Keywords:

Digitalization, Industry 4.0, industrial processes, maturity, life-cycle extension

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Life-cycle extension strategies have become critical enablers of circularity in product development. By emphasizing product longevity, reusability, repairability, and recycling capacity, these strategies aim to minimize resource consumption and waste generation while fostering sustainable value creation.

OBJECTIVES: This research paper aims to explore approaches for extending product life cycles across all phases, from design through manufacturing, use, and end-of-life. For companies seeking to extend the longevity of their products, it is essential to understand the main principles in product life cycle extension (PLCE) but also to evaluate their maturity before implementing such strategies, in order to be sure that the best decision will be made. In this context, this work introduces an innovative methodology designed to support decision-making process by helping companies identify critical aspects that influence successful PLCE.

METHODS: The present study explores principles relevant to PLCE, including durability, modularity, repairability, reusability, and recyclability. In addition, the role of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and additive manufacturing in supporting PLCE strategies, particularly in applications such as predictive maintenance, is analysed. The PLCE maturity model was developed and an assessment was conducted using a structured questionnaire designed to capture and classify influencing factors across three domains: organizational, cultural, and technological. To validate the methodology, the assessment was applied to three manufacturing companies.

RESULTS: The three use cases provided specific answers to the questionnaire that were reflected into different maturity levels. These results highlight the relevance in developing a methodology that support decision-making in product development focused on life cycle extension. The implementation of this structured methodology allowed to release specific guidelines that enable the improvement of PLCE through strategies that targets company’s needs.

CONCLUSION: Through a maturity assessment applied in three manufacturing companies, it was possible to characterize the readiness level for PLCE of each one and identify which issues should be worked on and what aspects are already mature in the company. With this knowledge in consideration, the companies can now make informed decisions of their next steps in innovation and management of their products’ life cycle.

References

[1] R. Ajwani-Ramchandani, S. Figueira, R. Torres de Oliveira, and S. Jha, “Enhancing the circular and modified linear economy: The importance of blockchain for developing economies,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 168, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105468.

[2] P. Morseletto, “Targets for a circular economy,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 153, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553.

[3] J. Grafström and S. Aasma, “Breaking circular economy barriers,” J Clean Prod, vol. 292, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126002.

[4] J. Kirchherr et al., “Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU),” Ecological Economics, vol. 150, pp. 264–272, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028.

[5] L. Milios, L. Holm Christensen, D. McKinnon, C. Christensen, M. K. Rasch, and M. Hallstrøm Eriksen, “Plastic recycling in the Nordics: A value chain market analysis,” Waste Management, vol. 76, pp. 180–189, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.034.

[6] F. Takacs, D. Brunner, and K. Frankenberger, “Barriers to a circular economy in small- and medium-sized enterprises and their integration in a sustainable strategic management framework,” J Clean Prod, vol. 362, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132227.

[7] K. Whalen, O. Mont, A. Plepys, and J. L. K. Nußholz, “Drivers And Barriers For The Swedish Industry: The Voice Of REES Companies,” 2017.

[8] N. Tura, J. Hanski, T. Ahola, M. Ståhle, S. Piiparinen, and P. Valkokari, “Unlocking circular business: A framework of barriers and drivers,” J Clean Prod, vol. 212, pp. 90–98, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202.

[9] D. Masi, V. Kumar, J. A. Garza-Reyes, and J. Godsell, “Towards a more circular economy: exploring the awareness, practices, and barriers from a focal firm perspective,” Production Planning and Control, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 539–550, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1080/09537287.2018.1449246.

[10] M. Bilal, K. I. A. Khan, M. J. Thaheem, and A. R. Nasir, “Current state and barriers to the circular economy in the building sector: Towards a mitigation framework,” J Clean Prod, vol. 276, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123250.

[11] M. Braungart, W. McDonough, and A. Bollinger, “Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions - a strategy for eco-effective product and system design,” J Clean Prod, vol. 15, no. 13–14, pp. 1337–1348, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003.

[12] C. Bakker, F. Wang, J. Huisman, and M. Den Hollander, “Products that go round: Exploring product life extension through design,” J Clean Prod, vol. 69, pp. 10–16, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.028.

[13] J. M. Allwood, M. F. Ashby, T. G. Gutowski, and E. Worrell, “Material efficiency: A white paper,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 362–381, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002.

[14] M. Leube and D. Walcher, “Designing for the next (Circular) Economy. An appeal to renew the Curricula of Design Schools,” Design Journal, vol. 20, no. sup1, pp. S492–S501, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352999.

[15] N. M. P. Bocken, I. de Pauw, C. Bakker, and B. van der Grinten, “Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy,” Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 308–320, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124.

[16] J. Müller, “Enabling Technologies for Industry 5.0 Results of a workshop with Europe’s technology leaders,” 2020. doi: 10.2777/082634.

[17] P. Ghisellini, C. Cialani, and S. Ulgiati, “A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems,” J Clean Prod, vol. 114, pp. 11–32, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007.

[18] J. Kirchherr, D. Reike, and M. Hekkert, “Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions,” 2017, Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.

[19] K. T. . Ulrich, S. D. . Eppinger, and M. C. . Yang, Product design and development. McGraw-Hill Education, 2020.

[20] A. Ziout, A. Azab, and M. Atwan, “A holistic approach for decision on selection of end-of-life products recovery options,” J Clean Prod, vol. 65, pp. 497–516, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.001.

[21] Hemant M. Patil, Saurabh S. Sirsikar, and Nitin N. Gholap, “Product Design and Development: Phases and Approach,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, vol. V6, no. 07, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.17577/IJERTV6IS070136.

[22] C. Favi, F. Campi, M. Germani, and M. Mandolini, “Engineering knowledge formalization and proposition for informatics development towards a CAD-integrated DfX system for product design,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 51, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2022.101537.

[23] K. Xing and M. Belusko, “Design for upgradability algorithm: Configuring durable products for competitive reutilization,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 130, no. 11, pp. 1111021–11110214, 2008, doi: 10.1115/1.2976446.

[24] Y. Hu, L. Chen, Y. Chi, and B. Song, “Manufacturer encroachment on a closed-loop supply chain with design for remanufacturing,” Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1941–1959, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1002/mde.3501.

[25] S. Ford and M. Despeisse, “Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges,” J Clean Prod, vol. 137, pp. 1573–1587, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150.

[26] M. Ertz, S. Sun, E. Boily, P. Kubiat, and G. G. Y. Quenum, “How transitioning to Industry 4.0 promotes circular product lifetimes,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 101, pp. 125–140, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.11.014.

[27] M. Sauerwein, E. Doubrovski, R. Balkenende, and C. Bakker, “Exploring the potential of additive manufacturing for product design in a circular economy,” J Clean Prod, vol. 226, pp. 1138–1149, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.108.

[28] J. Liu, Y. Zheng, Y. Ma, A. Qureshi, and R. Ahmad, “A Topology Optimization Method for Hybrid Subtractive–Additive Remanufacturing,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing - Green Technology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 939–953, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40684-019-00075-8.

[29] A. van Wijk and I. van Wijk, 3D printing with biomaterials: Towards a sustainable and circular economy. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2015.

[30] European Parliament and Council of the European Union, “DIRECTIVE 2008/98/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on waste and repealing certain Directives,” Nov. 2008.

[31] I. Errandonea, S. Beltrán, and S. Arrizabalaga, “Digital Twin for maintenance: A literature review,” Comput Ind, vol. 123, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103316.

[32] H. Fox, A. C. Pillai, D. Friedrich, M. Collu, T. Dawood, and L. Johanning, “A Review of Predictive and Prescriptive Offshore Wind Farm Operation and Maintenance,” Energies (Basel), vol. 15, no. 2, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15020504.

[33] J. D. Russell and N. Z. Nasr, “Value-retained vs. impacts avoided: the differentiated contributions of remanufacturing, refurbishment, repair, and reuse within a circular economy,” Journal of Remanufacturing, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 25–51, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13243-022-00119-4.

[34] A. M. King, S. C. Burgess, W. Ijomah, and C. A. McMahon, “Reducing waste: Repair, recondition, remanufacture or recycle?,” Sustainable Development, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 257–267, 2006, doi: 10.1002/sd.271.

[35] N. A. Aziz, D. A. Wahab, R. Ramli, and C. H. Azhari, “Modelling and optimisation of upgradability in the design of multiple life cycle products: A critical review,” Jan. 20, 2016, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.076.

[36] T. Cooper, “Inadequate Life? Evidence of Consumer Attitudes to Product Obsolescence,” J Consum Policy (Dordr), vol. 27, pp. 421–449, 2004.

[37] Y. Umeda, T. Daimon, and S. Kondoh, “Proposal of Decision Support Method for Life Cycle Strategy by Estimating Value and Physical Lifetimes - Case Study. In: Fourth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing,” in Fourth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo: Union of EcoDesigners, Dec. 2005, p. 975.

[38] J. Lienig and H. Bruemmer, Fundamentals of electronic systems design. Springer International Publishing, 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-55840-0.

[39] D. A. P. Paterson, W. L. Ijomah, and J. F. C. Windmill, “End-of-life decision tool with emphasis on remanufacturing,” J Clean Prod, vol. 148, pp. 653–664, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.011.

[40] J. Singh, “The Sustainability Potential of Upcycling,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 10, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14105989.

[41] A. M. King, S. C. Burgess, W. Ijomah, and C. A. McMahon, “Reducing waste: Repair, recondition, remanufacture or recycle?,” Sustainable Development, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 257–267, 2006, doi: 10.1002/sd.271.

[42] E. Pawlik, W. Ijomah, J. Corney, and D. Powell, “Exploring the Application of Lean Best Practices in Remanufacturing: Empirical Insights into the Benefits and Barriers,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 1, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14010149.

[43] D. Hariyani, P. Hariyani, S. Mishra, and M. Kumar Sharma, “Leveraging digital technologies for advancing circular economy practices and enhancing life cycle analysis: A systematic literature review,” Waste Management Bulletin, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 69–83, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.wmb.2024.06.007.

[44] R. Agrawal, V. S. Yadav, A. Majumdar, A. Kumar, S. Luthra, and J. Arturo Garza-Reyes, “Opportunities for disruptive digital technologies to ensure circularity in supply Chain: A critical review of drivers, barriers and challenges,” Comput Ind Eng, vol. 178, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109140.

[45] A. H. Trevisan, A. Lobo, D. Guzzo, L. A. de V. Gomes, and J. Mascarenhas, “Barriers to employing digital technologies for a circular economy: A multi-level perspective,” J Environ Manage, vol. 332, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117437.

[46] A. A. Khan and J. Abonyi, “Information sharing in supply chains – Interoperability in an era of circular economy,” Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, vol. 5, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100074.

[47] A. H. Molla, H. Shams, Z. Harun, M. N. Ab Rahman, and H. Hishamuddin, “An Assessment of Drivers and Barriers to Implementation of Circular Economy in the End-of-Life Vehicle Recycling Sector in India,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 20, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142013084.

[48] H. A. Rogers, P. Deutz, and T. B. Ramos, “Repairing the circular economy: Public perception and participant profile of the repair economy in Hull, UK,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 168, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105447.

[49] N. Roskladka, A. Jaegler, and G. Miragliotta, “From ‘right to repair’ to ‘willingness to repair’: Exploring consumer’s perspective to product lifecycle extension,” J Clean Prod, vol. 432, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139705.

[50] A. Marke, C. Chan, G. Taskin, and T. Hacking, “Reducing e-waste in China’s mobile electronics industry: the application of the innovative circular business models,” Asian Education and Development Studies, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 591–610, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1108/AEDS-03-2019-0052.

[51] WRAP, “A YEAR OF TRANSFORMATION Annual Report and Consolidated Accounts 2023/24,” 2024.

[52] Y. Ryan-Fogarty, K. Casey, D. Coughlan, M. Lichrou, L. O’malley, and C. Fitzpatrick, “An Investigation into WEEE Arising and Not Arising in Ireland (EEE2WEEE).” [Online]. Available: www.epa.ie

[53] N. Rosklada, G. Miragliotta, G. Bressanelli, and N. Saccani, “Exploiting the Right to Repair towards a sustainable future: a systematic literature review,” in Proceedings of the 29th EurOMA Conference, Berlin, 2022, pp. 1–10.

[54] R. J. Hernandez, C. Miranda, and J. Goñi, “Empowering sustainable consumption by giving back to consumers the ‘right to repair,’” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 3, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12030850.

[55] M. Sabbaghi, W. Cade, S. Behdad, and A. M. Bisantz, “The current status of the consumer electronics repair industry in the U.S.: A survey-based study,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 116, pp. 137–151, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.013.

[56] M. van der Velden, “‘Fixing the World One Thing at a Time’: Community repair and a sustainable circular economy,” J Clean Prod, vol. 304, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127151.

[57] H. Wieser and N. Tröger, “Exploring the inner loops of the circular economy: Replacement, repair, and reuse of mobile phones in Austria,” J Clean Prod, vol. 172, pp. 3042–3055, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.106.

[58] D. M. Godfrey, L. L. Price, and R. F. Lusch, “Repair, Consumption, and Sustainability: Fixing Fragile Objects and Maintaining Consumer Practices,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 229–251, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucab067.

[59] A. Abdullah, S. Saraswat, and F. Talib, “A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 implementation using data envelopment analysis and best and worst method approaches,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1533–1563, May 2025, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-12-2023-0668.

[60] J. Fortier, S. Gamache, and C. Fonrouge, “Integrating Sustainable Performance into the Digital Maturity Models for SMEs in Manufacturing,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 7, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15074041.

[61] T. Trauer and A. Mackinnon, “Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement,” vol. 10, pp. 579–585, 2001.

[62] L. Rossi, D. Leone, A. Barni, and A. Fontana, “Assessing the Sustainability of Industrial Equipment Life Extension Strategies through a Life Cycle Approach: Methodology and Practical Guidelines,” Processes, vol. 10, no. 2, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/pr10020203.

[63] T. Karaulova and V. Bashkite, “Decision-making framework for used industrial equipment,” Engineering Economics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2016, doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.27.1.8618.

[64] D. M. Ahern, J. Armstrong, A. Clouse, J. R. Ferguson, W. Hayes, and K. E. Nidiffer, CMMI SCAMPI Distilled: Appraisals for Process Improvement, 1st ed. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2005.

[65] M. C. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. B. Chrissis, and C. V Weber, “Capability Maturity Model SM for Software, Version 1.1,” 1993. [Online]. Available: http://www.rai.com

Downloads

Published

2025-11-03

How to Cite

1.
Oliveira B, Aguiar L, Gouveia Álvaro, Campilho R, Sousa D, Rodrigues M, et al. Organizational Maturity and its Impacts in Product Development. EAI Endorsed Digi Trans Ind Pros [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 3 [cited 2025 Nov. 4];1(3). Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/dtip/article/view/10203