Digitization of civil architecture objects during wartime using photogrammetry: A case study of Sumy State University

Ihor Tytarenko; Ivan Pavlenko

Authors

Ihor Tytarenko O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0269-9698
Ivan Pavlenko Sumy State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-1040

Keywords:

digital reconstruction, cultural heritage preservation, resilient infrastructure design, sustainable reconstruction of war-damaged sites, digital documentation for historical memory, post-conflict recovery planning

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the context of the ongoing war in Ukraine, the preservation of architectural heritage has become critically important. In this regard, the documentation and preservation of architectural heritage have become crucial.

OBJECTIVES: The study employs drone-based aerial imaging and terrestrial photography to generate accurate 3D models of a partially destroyed historic building.

METHODS: A photogrammetric technique was employed to create an accurate 3D model of Campus K-2 of Sumy State University, destroyed by russian missiles on April 13, 2025, in Sumy, Ukraine. A comprehensive approach for involving photogrammetric reconstruction, texture processing, and building information modeling (BIM) integration was described. The research also outlines the challenges of restoring during wartime, discusses data acquisition and processing workflow, and evaluates the effectiveness of low-cost equipment and open-source software in achieving high-quality results.

RESULTS: The resulting digital model captures structural deformations and facade details. The implemented approach enables documentation and monitoring of damaged structures. It also provides valuable fundamentals for the studied object’s future restoration, structural analysis, and memorialization.

CONCLUSION: The research shows photogrammetry as a fast, reliable tool for documenting cultural heritage in wartime and emphasizes its social value for education and preservation. It also suggests adding protective architectural features to reconstructed heritage buildings to improve resilience in conflict zones.

References

[1] Chagovets O, Zhukova, O. Reconstruction of destroyed architectural monuments in Ukraine: Between historical authenticity and modern needs of the urban environment. Protection of Cultural Heritage. 2024; 22, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.6122

[2] Savchyn I, Tretyak K, Brusak I, Lozynskyi V, Duma M. Rapid fixation and digitization for cultural heritage preservation in conflict zones. In: International Conference of Young Professionals “GeoTerrace-2023”; October 2–4, 2023; Lviv, Ukraine. Bunnik, Utrecht, Netherlands: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. 2023; 2023: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2023510030

[3] Kong X. Monitoring time-varying changes of historic structures through photogrammetry-driven digital twinning. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2024; XLVIII-2-2024: 181–186. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-2024-181-2024

[4] Escolà A, Peña JM, López-Granados F, Rosell-Polo JR, Castro AI, Gregorio E, Jiménez-Brenes FM, Sanz R, Sebé F, Llorens J, Torres-Sánchez J. Mobile terrestrial laser scanner vs. UAV photogrammetry to estimate woody crop canopy parameters – Part 1: Methodology and comparison in vineyards. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2023; 212: 108109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108109

[5] Colomina I, Molina P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2014; 92: 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013

[6] Remondino F, Rizzi A. Reality-based 3D documentation of natural and cultural heritage sites – Techniques, problems, and examples. Applied Geomatics. 2010; 2: 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-010-0025-x

[7] Tofail SAM, Koumoulos EP, Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S, O’Donoghue L, Charitidis C. Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. 2018; 21(1): 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001

[8] Luhmann T. Close range photogrammetry for industrial applications. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2010; 65(6): 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.06.003

[9] Park S, Choi Y. Applications of unmanned aerial vehicles in mining from exploration to reclamation: A review. Minerals. 2020; 10(8): 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10080663

[10] Zhang C, Kovacs JM. The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: A review. Precision Agriculture. 2012; 13: 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-012-9274-5

[11] Chapinal-Heras D, Díaz-Sánchez C, Gómez-García N, España-Chamorro S, Pagola-Sánchez L, Corselas MPL, Zafiria MER. Photogrammetry, 3D modelling and printing: The creation of a collection of archaeological and epigraphical materials at the university. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. 2024; 33: e00341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2024.e00341

[12] Martorelli M, Pens, C, Speranza D. Digital photogrammetry for documentation of maritime heritage. Journal of Maritime Archaeology. 2014; 9: 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-014-9124-x

[13] Turner D, Lucieer A, Watson C. An automated technique for generating georectified mosaics from ultra-high resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery, based on structure from motion (SfM) point clouds. Remote Sensing. 2012; 4(5): 1392–1410. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4051392

[14] Ivanysko S, Kazakevych G, Shydlovskyi P. Cultural heritage in the russo-Ukrainian war: A victim in the conflict. Complutum. 2024; 35(1); 191–214. https://doi.org/10.5209/cmpl.95930

[15] Ferdani D, Fanini B, Piccioli MC, Carboni F, Vigliarolo P. 3D reconstruction and validation of historical background for immersive VR applications and games: The case study of the Forum of Augustus in Rome. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2020; 43: 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.12.004

[16] Rodriguez-Garcia B, Guillen-Sanz H, Checa D, Bustillo A. A systematic review of virtual 3D reconstructions of cultural heritage in immersive virtual reality. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2024; 83: 89743–89793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-18700-3

[17] Bolognesi M, Furini A, Russo V, Pellegrinelli A, Russo P. Accuracy of cultural heritage 3D models by RPAS and terrestrial photogrammetry. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2014; XL-5; 113–119. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-113-2014

[18] Hu D, Minner J. UAVs and 3D city modeling to aid urban planning and historic preservation: A systematic review. Remote Sensing. 2023; 15(23): 5507. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15235507

[19] Jiménez-Jiménez SI, Ojeda-Bustamante W, Marcial-Pablo M, Enciso J. Digital terrain models generated with low-cost UAV photogrammetry: Methodology and accuracy. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2021; 10(5): 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10050285

[20] Orihuela A, Molina-Fajardo MA. UAV photogrammetry surveying for sustainable conservation: The case of Mondújar Castle (Granada, Spain). Sustainability. 2021; 13(1): 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010024

[21] Petráček P, Krátký V, Saska M. Dronument: System for reliable deployment of micro aerial vehicles in dark areas of large historical monuments. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2020; 5(2): 2078–2085. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.2969935

[22] Rinaudo F, Chiabrando F, Lingua A, Spanò A. Archaeological site monitoring: UAV photogrammetry can be an answer. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2012; XXXIX-B5: 583–588. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B5-583-2012

[23] Samadzadegan F, Javan AB, Asl MZ. Architectural heritage 3D modelling using unmanned aerial vehicles multi-view imaging. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2023; XLVIII-M-2-2023: 1395–1402. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1395-2023

[24] Srinivasan R, Yuvaraj S, Gowthaman V, Prakash T, Muthukumaravel S. Customized hexacopter drone design and reliability assessment for coastal monitoring. Journal of Engineering Sciences (Ukraine). 2025; 12(2): E1–E13. https://doi.org/10.21272/jes.2025.12(2).e1

[25] Tong X, Liu X, Chen P, Liu S, Luan K, Li L, Liu S, Liu X, Xie H, Jin Y, Hong Z. Integration of UAV-based photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning for the three-dimensional mapping and monitoring of open-pit mine areas. Remote Sensing. 2015; 7(6): 6635–6662. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70606635

[26] Tytarenko I, Machado J, Pavlenko I. Digitization of architectural heritage objects using photogrammetry: Sumy Region case study. Journal of Engineering Sciences (Ukraine). 2025; 12(1): E18–E28. https://doi.org/10.21272/jes.2025.12(1).e3

[27] Ulvi A. Documentation, three-dimensional (3D) modelling and visualization of cultural heritage by using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanners. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2021; 42(6): 1994–2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1834164

[28] Yang S, Xu S, Huang W. 3D point cloud for cultural heritage: A scientometric survey. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(21): 5542. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215542

[29] Sucu MS, Yılmaz HM. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data documentation of cultural heritage availability: 1001 church. Turkish Journal of Geosciences. 2021; 2(1): 27–32. https://doi.org/10.48053/turkgeo.900777

[30] Grussenmeyer P, Landes T, Voegtle T, Ringle K. Comparison methods of terrestrial laser scanning, photogrammetry and tacheometry data for recording of cultural heritage buildings. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2008; 37(B5): 213–218.

[31] Nex F, Remondino F. UAV for 3D mapping applications: A review. Applied Geomatics. 2014; 6(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x

[32] Lucieer A, Turner D, King DH, Robinson SA. Using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to capture micro-topography of Antarctic moss beds. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2014; 27(A): 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.05.011

[33] Azzola P, Cardaci A, Roberti GM, Nannei VM. UAV photogrammetry for cultural heritage preservation modeling and mapping Venetian Walls of Bergamo. 2019; The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences; XLII-2/W9: 45–50. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-45-2019

[34] Karahan A, Gökçe O, Demircan N, Özgeriş M, Karahan F. Integrating UAV photogrammetry and GIS to assess terrace landscapes in mountainous Northeastern Türkiye for sustainable land management. Sustainability. 2025; 17(13): 5855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135855

[35] Storch M, Kisliuk B, Jarmer T, Waske B, Lange N. Comparative analysis of UAV-based LiDAR and photogrammetric systems for the detection of terrain anomalies in a historical conflict landscape. Science of Remote Sensing. 2025; 11: 100191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2024.100191

[36] Chatzistamatis S, Tsekouras GE, Anagnostopoulos C-N. The quality in 3D acquisition of cultural heritage assets: Challenges and risks. In: Ioannides M, Patias P (eds). 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage III. Cham, Switzerland: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2023; 13125: 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35593-6_4

[37] Novhorodchenko A, Shnal T, Yakovchuk R, Tur N. The study of the behavior of reinforced concrete structures of modular shelter in conditions of explosion. In: Blikharskyy Z, Koszelnik P, Licholai L, Nazarko P, Katunsky D (eds). Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture. Proceeding of CEE 2023; September 6–8, 2023; Rzeszów, Poland. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 2024; 438: 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44955-0_29

[38] Anas SM, Alam M, Umair M. Reinforced cement concrete (RCC) shelter and prediction of its blast loads capacity. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023; 74(4): 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.125

[39] Zhydkova T, Hleba V, Gnatiuk L, Zhlobnitsky A, Priymachenko O. Adjustment of basement rooms of buildings for shelter for the civilian population. Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures. 2023; 110: 483–495. https://doi.org/10.32347/2410-2547.2023.110.483-495

[40] Li Y, Du Y, Yang M, Liang J, Bai H, Li R, Law A. A review of the tools and techniques used in the digital preservation of architectural heritage within disaster cycles. Heritage Science. 2023; 11: 199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01035-x

[41] Tytarenko I, Pavlenko I, Taraban Y, Pavlenko V, Ramos D. Digitization of architectural heritage objects in wartime: An underground space protection case study. In: Machado J, Trojanowska J, Soares F, Butdee S, Rea P, Gramescu B (eds). Innovations in Mechatronics Engineering IV, pp. 117–129. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94223-5_11

[42] Al-Barzngy MYM, Khayat M. Post-conflict safeguarding of built heritage: Content analysis of the ICOMOS Heritage at Risk journal, 2000–2019. Sustainability. 2023; 15(16): 12364. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612364

Digitization of civil architecture objects during wartime using photogrammetry: A case study of Sumy State University

Authors

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Funding data

Make a Submission

Current Issue

Keywords