A Comparative Study on Frequent Link Disconnection problems in VANETs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.10-4-2018.154444Keywords:
Vehicular Ad-hoc Network, Mobile Ad-hoc Network, Grid-Based Predictive Geographical Routing, Greedy Perimeter Coordinator Routing (GPCR), Greedy Perimeter Stateless RoutingAbstract
Vehicular Ad-hoc network is an emerging technology, which takes vehicles as nodes and forms a wireless network. The topology of such network changes rapidly as the nodes are in continuous motion with different speeds, leading to some serious issues that must be handled correctly in order to make VANETs reliable. One of the main problems associated with VANETs is Frequent Link Disconnection. There have been many designed for VANETs but Rapid change in topology has made it really problematic to design a routing protocol for VANETs that is efficient and effective in all terms. In this paper, we compared the four major VANET routing protocols, GPGR, GPSR, GPCR & HarpiaGrid in terms of Frequent Link Breakage with respect to velocity of nodes and the number of nodes. The results have proved, HarpiaGrid and GPGR are the better routing protocols than other two. If overhead cost is ignored, HarpiaGrid gives the outstanding performance.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 license, which permits unlimited use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.