Applied Design and Methodology of Delivery Robots Based on Human–Robot Interaction in Smart Cities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsc.2649

Keywords:

Smart Cities, Smart Mobility, Robotics, Robot, Human-Robot Interaction, HRI, Human-centric computing, Interaction Design, User centric design, Robot design, Robot Methodology

Abstract

This paper proposes an optimised design of an autonomous delivery robot while adopting the latest technologies from the different branching fields of robotics, artificial intelligence, and tele-communication. As a prospective representation of a user-centric robot design, the proposal is design with the major focus on maximizing users’ satisfaction throughout every human–robot interaction (HRI) touchpoints. By the use of sensor fusion techniques along with the deployment of an image-detection-based technique accompanying the point-cloud-detection-based path-planning methodology, the robot delivery would be optimised with effective path-planning and obstacle avoidance capability. With the extension of 5G connectivity, it is proposed that the real-time status update and video stream would enable greater efficiency in terms of remote monitoring and centralised robot administration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bilge Mutlu and Jodi Forlizzi. 2008. Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and envi- ronmental factors in human-robot interaction. In Pro- ceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction (HRI '08), March 12 – 15, 2008, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ACM Inc., New York, NY, 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349860

Madoka Inoue, Kensuke Koda, Kelvin Cheng, Toshimasa Yamanaka, and Soh Masuko. 2022. Improving Pedestrian Safety around Autonomous Delivery Robots in Real Environment with Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST '22), November 29 – December 1, 2022, Tsukuba, Japan. ACM Inc., New York, NY, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3562939.3565644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3562939.3565644

Shuxiang Yao. 2022. Research on Automatic Delivery Robot Control Based on Multi-sensor Fusion. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Workshop on Control Sciences and Auto-mation (WCSA '22), April 8 – 10, 2022, Xiamen, China. ACM Inc., New York, NY, 19– 24.https://doi.org/10.1145/3543303.3543307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3543303.3543307

Yan Zhang, Yunhuai Liu, Genjian Li, Yi Ding, Ning Chen, Hao Zhang, Tian He, and Desheng Zhang. 2019. Route Prediction for Instant Delivery. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiqui-tous Technol. 3, 3, Article 124 (Sep.2019), 25 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3351282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3351282

Thomas B. Sheridan. 2016. Human–Robot Interaction: Status and Challenges. Human Factors 58, 4 (April 2016),

–532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816644364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816644364

Patric R. Spence, David Westerman, Chad Edwards, and Autumn Edwards. 2014. Welcoming Our Robot Overlords: Initial Expectations About Interaction With a Robot. Communication Research Reports 31, 3 (July 2014),

–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.924337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.924337

R. Clarke. 1994. Asimov's laws of robotics: Impli- cations for information technology. 2. Computer 27, 1 (Jan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/2.248881

, 57–66. DOI: hhtps://doi.org/10.1109/2.248881

Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2007. Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: Biological sciences 362, 1480 (Feb. 2007), 679–704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2004

/rstb.2006.2004

Valeria Villani, Fabio Pini, Francesco Leali, and Cristian Secchi. 2018. Survey on human-robot collabo- ration in industrial settings: Safety, intuitive interfaces and applications. Mechat-ronics 55 (Nov. 2018), 248–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.02.009

Eitan Marder-Eppstein, Eric Berger, Tully Foote, Brian Gerkey, and Kurt Konolige. 2010. The Office Marathon: Robust navigation in an indoor office environment. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 5 – 10, 2010, Anchorage, AK. IEEE, New York, NY, 300–307. https://doi.org/10. 1109/ROBOT.2010.5509725 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509725

Josep Aulinas, Yvan Petillot, Joaquim Salvi, and Xavier Lladó. 2008. The SLAM problem: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Research and Development 184 (2008), 363–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-58603-925-7-363

Isro Wasisto, Novera Istiqomah, I Kadek Nuary Trisnawan, and Agung Nugroho Jati. 2019. Implemen- tation of Mobile Sensor Navigation System Based on Adaptive Monte Carlo Localization. In 2019 International Conference on Computer, Control, Infor-matics and its Applications (IC3INA), October 23 – 24, 2019, Tangerang, Indonesia, IEEE, New York, NY, 187-192. https://doi. org/10.1109/IC3INA48034.2019.8949581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3INA48034.2019.8949581

Kenji Koide, Jun Miura, and Emanuele Menegatti. 2019. A portable three-dimensional LIDAR-based system for long-term and wide-area people behavior measurement. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 16, 2 (April 2019), 1729881419841532. DOI:https://doi.org/10. 1177/1729881419841532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881419841532

Wing-ting Law, Ki-sing Li, Kam-wah Fan, Wang-hon Ko, Tiande Mo, and Chi-kin Poon. 2022. Two-way Human-Robot Interaction in 5G Tele-operation. In Pro- ceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Inter-action (HRI '22), March 7 – 10, 2022, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. IEEE Press, New York, NY, 1198–1199. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889509

Rashid Ali, Yousaf Bin Zikria, Ali Kashif Bashir, Sahil Garg, and Hyung Seok Kim. 2021. URLLC for 5G and Beyond: Requirements, Enabling Incumbent Tech- nologies and Network Intelligence. IEEE Access 9 (April 2021), 67064–67095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC ESS.2021.3073806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073806

Viacheslav Kovtun and Krzysztof Grochla. 2022. Investigation of the competitive nature of eMBB and mMTC 5G services in conditions of limited communi- cation resource. Scientific Reports 12, 1 (Sep. 2022), 16050. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20135-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20135-5

Yi Zeng, Haofan Yi, Zijie Xia, Shaoshi Wang, Bo Ai, Dan Fei, Weidan Li, and Ke Guan. 2020. Measurement and

Simulation for Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Communications at 3.5 GHz for 5G. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2020, Article 851600 (Dec. 2020), 13 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8851600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8851600

Sai Vemprala, Rogerio Bonatti, Arthur Bucker, and Ashish Kapoor. 2023. Chatgpt for robotics: Design principles and model abilities. Microsoft. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/ 2023/02/ChatGPT Robotics.pdf

Kattepur, A. and Khemkha, S. 2021. Aspects of Mechanism Design for Industry 4.0 Multi-Robot Task Auctioning. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities. 6, 17 (Aug. 2021), e2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-8-2021.170670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-8-2021.170670

Bodi, M. , Szopek, M. , Zahadat, P. and Schmickl, T. 2016. Evolving Mixed Societies: A one-dimensional modelling approach. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities. 1, 3 (May 2016), e5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-12-2015.2262514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-12-2015.2262514

Downloads

Published

26-06-2023

How to Cite

[1]
W. T. LAW, K. W. Fan, K. S. Li, and T. Mo, “Applied Design and Methodology of Delivery Robots Based on Human–Robot Interaction in Smart Cities”, EAI Endorsed Trans Smart Cities, vol. 7, no. 2, p. e3, Jun. 2023.