Data science analysis of Vassiliev invariants and knot similarity based on distributed machine learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.3088Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Knot theory has a long history, and as a branch of topology, it has received extensive attention. At present, the scientific analysis of data based on the similarity of Vassiliev invariants and knots under machine learning technology is the focus of the mathematical community. However, at present, there are some difficulties in the research work on the similarity of Vassiliev invariants and knots. These difficulties not only delay the progress of Vassiliev invariants research, but also slow down the speed of knot similarity research.
OBJECTIVES: However, with the acceleration of the intelligent process, various intelligent technologies have been applied in the research of mathematics, biology and physics, providing excellent help for the research of many disciplines. Therefore, machine learning technology could be used to carry out new research on Vassiliev invariants and knot similarity.
METHODS: Traditional knot analysis technology was combined with machine learning technology to find a more efficient and stable way of exploring Vassiliev invariants and knot similarity. his paper proposed a research method of data scientific analysis based on Vassiliev invariants and knot similarity under machine learning technology. Its purpose was to combine traditional knot research methods with machine learning technology to improve the efficiency of knot research. The algorithm proposed in this paper was the knot Vassiliev invariant analysis algorithm based on machine learning, which could use the intelligent and efficient analysis algorithm of machine learning technology to process the data of complex knots. This algorithm has improved the accuracy of the analysis of knot characteristics, and reduced the analysis time and the memory consumption at runtime.
RESULTS: By testing the similarity between the Vassiliev invariant based on machine learning and the knot, the results showed that the analysis accuracy of the traditional Vassiliev invariant computing technology for the chiral characteristics, the number of intersections and the number of knots in the knot image was 84.25%, 83.27% and 85.56% respectively. The accuracy of knot Vassiliev invariant analysis algorithm based on machine learning for these indicators was 91.87%, 92.66% and 92.12% respectively. Obviously, the knot Vassiliev invariant analysis algorithm based on machine learning was superior to the traditional knot computing technology, and its analysis results were more excellent.
CONCLUSION: In general, the research topic proposed in this paper has been proved to be of practical value. This research result proved that machine learning technology could play an excellent role in the current knot research, which correspondingly expanded the research direction of Vassiliev invariants and knot similarity.
References
Cheng, Zhiyun. "A transcendental function invariant of virtual knots." Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan 69.4 (2017): 1583-1599.
Budney, Ryan. "Embedding calculus knot invariants are of finite type." Algebraic & Geometric Topology 17.3 (2017): 1701-1742.
Kim, Se-Goo, and Charles Livingston. "Secondary upsilon invariants of knots." The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics 69.3 (2018): 799-813.
Jeong, Myeong-Ju, and Chan-Young Park. "Delta Moves and Arrow Polynomials of Virtual Knots." Kyungpook Mathematical Journal 58.1 (2018): 183-202.
Nelson, Sam, Natsumi Oyamaguchi, and Radmila Sazdanovic. "Psyquandles, singular knots and pseudoknots." Tokyo Journal of Mathematics 42.2 (2019): 405-429.
Ekholm, Tobias, Lenhard Ng, and Vivek Shende. "A complete knot invariant from contact homology." Inventiones mathematicae 211.3 (2018): 1149-1200.
Aistleitner, Christoph, and Bence Borda. "Quantum invariants of hyperbolic knots and extreme values of trigonometric products." Mathematische Zeitschrift 302.2 (2022): 759-782.
Etnyre, John, David Vela-Vick, and Rumen Zarev. "Sutured Floer homology and invariants of Legendrian and transverse knots." Geometry & Topology 21.3 (2017): 1469-1582.
Ito, Tetsuya. "Applications of the Casson-Walker invariant to the knot complement and the cosmetic crossing conjectures." Geometriae Dedicata 216.6 (2022): 1-15.
Bettin, Sandro, and Sary Drappeau. "Modularity and value distribution of quantum invariants of hyperbolic knots." Mathematische Annalen 382.3 (2022): 1631-1679.
Bar-Natan, Dror, and Roland van der Veen. "A polynomial time knot polynomial." Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 147.1 (2019): 377-397.
Baldwin, John, and David Vela-Vick. "A note on the knot Floer homology of fibered knots." Algebraic & geometric topology 18.6 (2018): 3669-3690.
Bar-Natan, Dror, and Zsuzsanna Dancso. "Finite type invariants of w-knotted objects II: tangles, foams and the Kashiwara–Vergne problem." Mathematische Annalen 367.3 (2017): 1517-1586.
Korablev, F. G. "Quasoids in knot theory." Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics 303.1 (2018): 156-165.
Jeong, Myeong-Ju, Chan-Young Park, and Maeng Sang Park. "Polynomials and homotopy of virtual knot diagrams." Kyungpook Mathematical Journal 57.1 (2017): 145-161.
Douglas, Michael R. "Machine learning as a tool in theoretical science." Nature Reviews Physics 4.3 (2022): 145-146.
Shang, Chao, and Fengqi You. "Data analytics and machine learning for smart process manufacturing: Recent advances and perspectives in the big data era." Engineering 5.6 (2019): 1010-1016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Chenggang Huo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.