Study on the assessment of absorbed energy of bulbous bow in ship collision
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsmre.9723Keywords:
Ship collision, Impact dynamics, Energy absorbed, Bulbous bow, FEMAbstract
The evaluation of energy absorption characteristics of the bulbous bow structure in ship collisions or grounding accidents is a crucial research area. Predicting dynamic reactions or determining the collision energy absorption capability of the bulbous bow structure during impacts is essential in the design process. This paper investigates the collision behavior of the bulbous bow structure impacting a rigid wall using numerical simulations conducted with the commercial finite element code FEA. Namely, impact force histories on the bulbous bow structure, crushing depths/displacements, and collision energy absorption of the ship structure during impact are numerically determined under, consideration of different collision velocities, ship masses, impact angles and impact positions. The FEM results will be compared to results obtained from AASHTO. The results indicate that collision forces, deformations of the bulbous bow structure, and absorbed collision energies can be effectively predicted using current numerical simulation. The maximum collision force and energy absorption are directly influenced by the collision velocity and mass of the impacting ship. Notably, variations in collision positions (𝐻𝐻) and impact angles (𝛼𝛼) result in differences in collision forces and deformations at the bulbous bow structure. Therefore, careful consideration of parameters (𝐻𝐻) and (𝛼𝛼) is crucial to predict structural damage effectively. In addition, the pre-and post-collision motion behavior of the ship is also evaluated using a 6-degree-of-freedom (6 DOF) system.
References
[1] Yu, Z., Shen, Y., Amdahl, J., & Greco, M. (2016). Implementation of Linear Potential-Flow Theory in the 6DOF Coupled Simulation of Ship Collision and Grounding Accidents. Journal of Ship Research, 60(03), 119–114. https://doi.org/10.5957/jsr.2016.60.3.119
[2] Hong, L., & Amdahl, J. (2012). Rapid assessment of ship grounding over large contact surfaces. Ships and Offshore Structures, 7(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2011.579003
[3] Simonsen, B. C. (1997). Ship grounding on rock—I. Theory. Marine Structures, 10(7), 519–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8339(98)00002-1
[4] Yu, Z., Hu, Z., & Wang, G. (2015). Plastic mechanism analysis of structural performances for stiffeners on bottom longitudinal web girders during a shoal grounding accident. Marine Structures, 40, 134–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2014.11.001
[5] Pan, J., Wang, T., Zhang, W. Z., Huang, S. W., & Xu, M. C. (2022). Study on the assessment of axial crushing force of bulbous bow for bridge against ship collision. Ocean Engineering, 255, 111411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111411
[6] Wang, Z., Guo, C., Wang, C., Chen, G., Xu, Y., & Li, Q. (2023). An analytical method for predicting the structural response of ship side structures by bulbous bow in oblique collision scenarios. Ships and Offshore Structures, 19(10), 1490–1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2023.2247839
[7] Liu, B., Villavicencio, R., Pedersen, P. T., & Guedes Soares, C. (2021). Analysis of structural crashworthiness of double-hull ships in collision and grounding. Marine Structures, 76, 102898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102898
[8] Minorsky V. An analysis of ship collisions with reference to protection of nuclear power plants. New York: Sharp (George G.) Inc; 1958. AN ANALYSIS OF SHIP COLLISIONS WITH REFERENCE TO PROTECTION OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (Technical Report) | OSTI.GOV
[9] Reardon, P. and Sprung, J.L., “Validation of Minorsky’s Ship Collision Model and Use of the Model to Estimate the Probability of Damaging a Radioactive Material Transportation Cask During a Ship Collision”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Design and Methodologies for Collision and Grounding Protection of Ships, San Francisco, August 1996.
[10] Paik, J. K., Chung, J. Y., Choe, I. H., Thayamballi, A. K., & Pedersen, P. T. (2005). On the Rational Design of Double Hull Tanker Structures Against Collision. HHI Engineering Review, 25(No 3), 41 - 51. On Rational Design of Double Hull Tanker Structures against Collision — Welcome to DTU Research Database
[11] Terndrup Pedersen, P., & Zhang, S. (1998). On Impact mechanics in ship collisions. Marine Structures, 11(10), 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8339(99)00002-7
[12] STRONGE, W. J. 2004 Impact Mechanics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139050227
[13] YU, Z. AND AMDAHL, J. 2016b. Influence of 6DOF ship motions in the damage prediction of ship collision and grounding accidents, Proceedings, The 7th International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships and Offshore Structures, June 15–18, Ulsan, South Korea. Influence of 6DOF ship motions in the damage prediction of ship collision and grounding accidents (researchgate.net)
[14] Motora, S., Fujino, M., Sugiura, M., & Sugita, M. (1969). Equivalent Added Mass of Ship in the Collision. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 1969(126), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1969.126_141
[15] Tabri, K. (2012). Influence of coupling in the prediction of ship collision damage. Ships and Offshore Structures, 7(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2011.553812
[16] Yu, Z., & Amdahl, J. (2016). Full six degrees of freedom coupled dynamic simulation of ship collision and grounding accidents. Marine Structures, 47, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.03.001
[17] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Guide specification and commentary for vessel collision design of highway bridges. Volume I, final report. Washington DC (1991).
[18] Karlsson, U. B. (2009). Improved Collision Safety of Ships by an Intrusion-Tolerant Inner Side Shell. Marine Technology and SNAME News, 46(03), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.5957/mtsn.2009.46.3.165
[19] Simulation of Collisions between RORO Vessels with Improved Double-Hull Designs - Influence of Modelling Parameters in Explicit Finite Element Analysis. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/144895
[20] Ozguc, O. (2017). Structural damage of ship–FPSO collisions. Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, 18(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2017.1359387
[21] Paik, J. K. (2018). Ultimate Limit State Analysis and Design of Plated Structures. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119367758
[22] Yuan, P., & Harik, I. E. (2008). One‐Dimensional Model for Multi‐Barge Flotillas Impacting Bridge Piers. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 23(6), 437–447. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00550.x
[23] Chen, J., Zhu, L., & Pedersen, P. T. (2019). On Dynamic effects of Bulbous Bow Crushing. In Proceedings of the 29th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference (pp. 4288-4295). International Society of Offshore & Polar Engineers. On Dynamic effects of Bulbous Bow Crushing (dtu.dk)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Quyen Tran-manh, Hai Tran, Tao Tran-van
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.
