LQG, PID controller, ANN for single axis gimbal actuator

Nguyen Cong Danh

doi:10.4108/airo.v1i1.551

Authors

Nguyen Cong Danh The single author, District 2, HCMC, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/airo.v1i1.551

Keywords:

adjusting LQG, Kalman filters, PID controller, ANN, single axis gimbal

Abstract

Gimbal or other stable platforms have structures that move according to its functions. This is for the purpose of keeping track of the goals to the fullest. Tracking targets can become difficult as the subject moves further and further away and they are out of the gimbal’s allowable viewing range. Besides, under the influence of noise signals form outside space, it becomes even more difficult to observe the gimbal’s targets. To overcome above disadvantages, this paper is presented an adjustment method to limit above risks. Adjusting Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) for expensive gimbal systems, noise signals are processed purely by Kalman filters to improve the function of observing targets. In addition, proportional- integral-derivative (PID) controller, artificial neural network in this case is also considered to verify the effectiveness of control methods listed below. In particular, ANN is the most effective control method today to deal with unwanted signals. These unwanted signals can cause worsening conditions during the operation of systems.Therefore, artificial network (ANN) is a solution to information and communication security problems. Simulation is done by Matlab. Novelty of the work: no previous research has been published for this genre. The study of this genre with the use of artificial intelligence is suggestive of the study of artificial intellligence technologies at a higher level. This category is also a suggestion for studying a smoother control method based on existing data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdo, M., Vali, A.R., Toloei, A.R., and Arvan, M.R. (2014). Modeling control and simulation of two axes gimbal seeker using fuzzy PID controller. In 2014 22nd Iranian Conference on Electrical engineering (ICEE), 1342–1347. doi: 10. 1109/ Iranian CEE. 2014. 6999742.

Abdo, M.M., Vali, A.R., Toloei, A.R., and Arvan, M.R. (2014). Stabilization loop of a two axes gimbal system using self-tuning PID type fuzzy controller. ISA Transactions, 53(2), 591 602. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2013.12.008.

Abdo, M.M., Vali, A.R., Toloei, A.R., and Arvan, M.R. (2015). Improving two axes gimbal seeker performance using cascade control approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 229 (1), 38–55. doi: 10. 1177/ 0954410014525130

Ahi, B. and Nobakhti, A. (2018). Hardware implementation of an ADRC controller on a gimbal mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 26(6), 2268–2275. doi:10.1109 /TCST. 2017. 2746059.

Caponetto, R. and Xibilia, M.G. (2017). Fractional order PI control of a gimbal platform. In 2017 European Conference on Circuit Theory and Design (ECCTD), 1–4. doi:10.1109/ECCTD. 2017. 8093271. 32 Jitendra Sharma et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 53-1 (2020) 27–32.

Chen, X., Cai, Y., Ren, Y., Yang, X., and Peng, C. (2019). Spacecraft angular rates and angular acceleration estimation using single-gimbal magnetically suspended control moment gyros. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66(1), 440–450. doi:10.1109/TIE.2018.2826468.

Cui, P., Zhang, D., Yang, S., and Li, H. (2017). Friction compensation based on time-delay control and internal model control for a gimbal system in magnetically suspended CMG. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(5), 3798–3807. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2016.2644620.

Ding, Z., Zhao, F., Lang, Y., Jiang, Z., and Zhu, J. (2019). Anti-disturbance neural-sliding mode control for inertially stabilized platform with actuator saturation. IEEE Access, 7, 92220–92231. doi: 10. 1109/ACCESS. 2019. 2927427.

Fang, J. and Ren, Y. (2011). High-precision control for a single-gimbal magnetically suspended control moment gyro based on inverse system method. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58 (9), 4331–4342. doi: 10. 1109/TIE. 2010. 2095394.

Guo, Q., Liu, G., Xiang, B., Wen, T., and Liu, H. (2016). Robust control of magnetically suspended gimbals in inertial stabilized platform with wide load range. Mechatronics, 39, 127– 135. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2016.08.003.

Huang, L., Wu, Z., and Wang, K. (2018). High-precision anti-disturbance gimbal servo control for control moment gyroscopes via an extended harmonic disturbance observer. IEEE Access, 6, 66336–66349. doi: 10. 1109/ ACCESS. 2018. 2878623.

Jia, R., Nandikolla, V.K., Haggart, G., Volk, C., and Tazartes, D. (2017). System performance of an inertially stabilized gimbal platform with friction, resonance, and vibration effects. Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics, 2017.

Kim, S.B., Kim, S.H., and Kwak, Y.K. (2010). Robust control for a two-axis gimbaled sensor system with multivariable feedback systems. IET Control Theory Applications, 4(4),539–551. doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2008.0195.

Lee, H.P. (2019). Robust control of a two-axis gimbaled seeker using loop shaping design procedure. In 2019 20th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), 1–6. doi: 10. 1109/ Carpathian CC. 2019. 8766056.

Li, H., Ning, X., and Han, B. (2017a). Composite decoupling control of gimbal servo system in doublegimbaled variable speed CMG via disturbance observer. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 22(1), 312–320. doi: 10. 1109/ TMECH. 2016.2601340.

Li, H., Zheng, S., and Ning, X. (2017b). Precise control for gimbal system of double gimbal control moment gyro based on cascade extended state observer. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(6), 4653–4661. doi: 10. 1109/ TIE. 2017. 2674585.

Li, H., Ning, X., and Han, B. (2017). Speed tracking control for the gimbal system with harmonic drive. Control Engineering Practice, 58, 204 – 213. doi: https:// doi.org /10.1016 /j. conengprac. 2016. 11. 001.

Li, H., Yang, S., and Ren, H. (2016). Dynamic decoupling control of DGCMG gimbal system via state feedback linearization. Mechatronics, 36, 127 – 135. doi: https:// doi.org /10. 1016/ j. mechatronics. 2016. 04. 004.

Majumder, C.G., Kumar, K.A., Siva, M.S., and Philip, N. (2018). Integrated gimbal dynamics model for precise gimbal rate control in single gimbal-CMG to achieve high accuracy pointing. IFAC-Papers On Line, 51(1), 713 – 718. doi: https: //doi. org/10.1016/j. ifacol. 2018. 05. 120. 5th IFAC Conference on Advances in Control and Optimization of Dynamical Systems ACODS 2018.

Obiora, V. and Achumba, I.E. (2017). Adaptive control of aerial vehicle gimbal using fuzzy- PID compensator. In 2017 IEEE 3rd International Conference on ElectroTechnology for National Development (NIGERCON), 451–456. doi: 10. 1109 /NIGERCON. 2017. 8281914.

Rajesh, R.J. and Ananda, C.M. (2015). PSO tuned PID controller for controlling camera position in UAV using 2-axis gimbal. In 2015 International Conference on Power and Advanced Control Engineering (ICPACE), 128–133. doi: 10.1109/ ICPACE. 2015. 7274930.

An Enhanced GRU Model With Application to Manipulator Trajectory Tracking, EAI Endorsed Trans AI Robotics, vol. 1, no. 1, p. e1, 2022.

Briefly Revisit Kinematic Control of Redundant Manipulators via Constrained Optimization, EAI Endorsed Trans AI Robotics, vol. 1, no. 1, p. e4, 2022.

Incorporation of efficient second-order solvers into latent factor models for accurate prediction of missing QoS data, IEEE Trans. on Cybernetics, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1216-1228, 2018.

An Overview of Calibration Technology of Industrial Robots, IEEE/ CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23-36, Jan. 2021.

Diversified Regularization Enhanced Training for Effective Manipulator Calibration, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3153039.