AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance in Infrastructure and Facilities Management

Authors

  • Seaam Bin Masud Wilmington University image/svg+xml
  • Hasan Mahmud Sozib Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology image/svg+xml
  • Kamana Parvej Mishu Trine University image/svg+xml
  • Rahima Binta Bellal Cumberland University image/svg+xml
  • Mohammad Tahmid Ahmed Trine University image/svg+xml
  • Anwarul Matin Jony Washington University of Science and Technology
  • Syeda Tabassum Khulna University of Engineering and Technology image/svg+xml
  • Mohammad Morshed Uddin Al Mostam Sek Billah Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/airo.9975

Keywords:

Predictive Maintenance, Machine Learning, XGBoost, Infrastructure Management, Failure Diagnosis, Data-Driven Maintenance, IoT, Model Interpretability

Abstract

This study addresses the critical challenge of transforming traditional reactive maintenance approaches within infrastructure and facilities management into proactive, data-driven strategies leveraging advancements in artificial intelligence. Conventional maintenance, often reliant on fixed schedules or post-failure interventions, falls short in mitigating unexpected downtimes and escalating costs. To overcome these limitations, this research deploys multiple machine learning algorithms, namely, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Random Forest Classifier (RFC), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), applied to a comprehensive synthetic predictive maintenance dataset. This dataset encapsulates key operational metrics including temperature, torque, rotational speed, and tool wear across diverse failure modes. The comparative analysis reveals that XGBoost substantially outperforms alternative models, achieving a remarkable accuracy of 98.9% in multiclass failure prediction, supported by an AUC nearing 1.0 and F1 scores above 0.98 in both validation and test sets. RFC and SVC closely follow, each delivering precision and recall rates exceeding 95%. Notably, KNN provides rapid inference, facilitating real-time applications despite slightly lower accuracy metrics (~96.6%). Advanced preprocessing techniques, such as feature scaling, label encoding, and synthetic minority oversampling (SMOTE), enhanced model robustness amid inherent class imbalances. Critical features, including torque and tool wear, exhibited pronounced predictive importance, aligning with known mechanical failure signatures. The findings underscore AI’s potential to revolutionize maintenance by offering granular failure diagnostics and enabling timely interventions, thus significantly reducing operational costs and preventing catastrophic infrastructure failures. This research advances the state-of-the-art by integrating interpretability, cross-model benchmarking, and practical scalability considerations, positioning AI-driven predictive maintenance as a cornerstone of modern infrastructure resilience and sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Sixense Digital (Beyond Suite), "Predictive maintenance and SHM (Structural Health Monitoring): Transforming your infrastructure management," Beyond Suite, Aug. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.beyond-suite.com/en/predictivemaintenance-0824/. [Accessed: 6-Aug-2025].

[2] WorkTrek, "CMMS vs Traditional Maintenance," WorkTrek Blog, Feb. 2024 (approx.). [Online]. Available: https://worktrek.com/blog/cmms-vs-traditional-maintenance/. [Accessed: 6-Aug-2025].

[3] EIS Council, "The cost of unpreparedness: Economic impacts of infrastructure failures," EIS Council, 2025 (approx. 9 months ago). [Online]. Available: https://eiscouncil.org/the-cost-of-infrastructure-failures-preparedness/. [Accessed: 6-Aug-2025].

[4] Ganit Inc., "The $1.4 Trillion Global Cost of Unplanned Downtime," LinkedIn, 2 July 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/14-trillion-global-cost-unplanned-downtime-ganit-inc-hj1bc. [Accessed: 17-Aug-2025].

[5] World Bank, "Economic benefits of more reliable and resilient infrastructure: Final LOW WB G20 Report v4," World Bank, 1-Jun-2021. [Online]. Available: https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/sites/default/files/2022-03/Final-LOW_WB_G20_Report_v4_1JUN_2021.pdf. [Accessed: 6-Aug-2025].

[6] Mobility Work, "Industry 4.0 & IoT," Mobility Work, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://mobility-work.com/iot-en/. [Accessed: 6-Aug-2025].

[7] ThreeBond India, "Best 10 common industrial maintenance challenges & solutions," ThreeBond India, 2024 (approx. 1.4 years ago). [Online]. Available: https://threebondindia.com/industrial-maintenance-challenges-and-solutions/. [Accessed: 6-Aug-2025].

[8] UpKeep, "The advantages & disadvantages of preventive maintenance," UpKeep Learning Center, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://upkeep.com/learning/benefits-of-preventive-maintenance/. [Accessed: 6-Aug-2025].

[9] WorkTrek, "CMMS vs Traditional Maintenance: Making the choice clear!," WorkTrek Blog, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://worktrek.com/blog/cmms-vs-traditional-maintenance/. [Accessed: 6-Aug-2025].

[10] K. Lefrouni and S. Taibi, "Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Industrial Predictive Maintenance: A Systematic Review of Recent Advances," Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés, vol. 58, no. 4, 2025.

[11] A. Abbas, "AI for predictive maintenance in industrial systems," International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technologies and Innovations, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–51, 2024.

[12] R. A. Abdulrazzq, N. M. Sajid, and M. S. Hasan, "Artificial intelligence-driven predictive maintenance in IoT systems," South Florida Journal of Development, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. e4781–e4781, 2024.

[13] Y. Melnik, "Machine failure prediction using machine learning: Why it is beneficial," InData Labs, 10-Oct-2024. [Online]. Available: https://indatalabs.com/blog/machine-failure-prediction-machine-learning/. [Accessed: 6-Aug-2025].

[14] T. P. Carvalho, F. A. Soares, R. Vita, R. D. P. Francisco, J. P. Basto, and S. G. Alcalá, "A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance," Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 137, p. 106024, 2019.

[15] I. Hector and R. Panjanathan, "Predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: a survey of planning models and machine learning techniques," PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 10, p. e2016, 2024.

[16] M. Yousuf, T. Alsuwian, A. A. Amin, S. Fareed, and M. Hamza, "IoT-based health monitoring and fault detection of industrial AC induction motor for efficient predictive maintenance," Measurement and Control, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1146–1160, 2024.

[17] F. Civerchia, S. Bocchino, C. Salvadori, E. Rossi, L. Maggiani, and M. Petracca, "Industrial Internet of Things monitoring solution for advanced predictive maintenance applications," Journal of Industrial Information Integration, vol. 7, pp. 4–12, 2017.

[18] A. Ucar, M. Karakose, and N. Kırımça, "Artificial intelligence for predictive maintenance applications: key components, trustworthiness, and future trends," Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 898, 2024.

[19] Z. M. Çınar et al., "Machine learning in predictive maintenance towards sustainable smart manufacturing in industry 4.0," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 19, p. 8211, 2020.

[20] C. Tsallis, P. Papageorgas, D. Piromalis, and R. A. Munteanu, "Application-wise review of Machine Learning-based predictive maintenance: Trends, challenges, and future directions," Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 4898, 2025.

[21] M. S. Azari, F. Flammini, S. Santini, and M. Caporuscio, "A systematic literature review on transfer learning for predictive maintenance in industry 4.0," IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 12887–12910, 2023.

[22] M. L. Singgih and F. F. Zakiyyah, "Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance: A Literature Review," in 2024 Seventh International Conference on Vocational Education and Electrical Engineering (ICVEE), 2024, pp. 250–256.

[23] A. Aminzadeh et al., "A machine learning implementation to predictive maintenance and monitoring of industrial compressors," Sensors, vol. 25, no. 4, p. 1006, 2025.

[24] U. Dereci and G. Tuzkaya, "An explainable artificial intelligence model for predictive maintenance and spare parts optimization," Supply Chain Analytics, vol. 8, p. 100078, 2024.

[25] M. Imani, A. Beikmohammadi, and H. R. Arabnia, "Comprehensive Analysis of Random Forest and XGBoost Performance with SMOTE, ADASYN, and GNUS Upsampling Under Varying Imbalance Levels," 2025.

[26] S. Fatima, A. Hussain, S. B. Amir, S. H. Ahmed, and S. M. H. Aslam, "Xgboost and random forest algorithms: an in depth analysis," Pakistan Journal of Scientific Research (PJOSR), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 2023.

[27] Y. Mahale, S. Kolhar, and A. S. More, "A comprehensive review on artificial intelligence driven predictive maintenance in vehicles: technologies, challenges and future research directions," Discover Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 243, 2025.

[28] S. Aslam et al., "Machine Learning-Based Predictive Maintenance at Smart Ports Using IoT Sensor Data," Sensors, vol. 25, no. 13, p. 3923, 2025.

[29] R. A. Abu Rkab, "Predictive maintenance [Data set]," Kaggle, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/rashaali2003/predictive-maintenance.

[30] M. Kang and J. Tian, "Machine learning: Data pre‐processing," in Prognostics and Health Management of Electronics: Fundamentals, Machine Learning, and the Internet of Things, pp. 111–130, 2018.

[31] K. Maharana, S. Mondal, and B. Nemade, "A review: Data pre-processing and data augmentation techniques," Global Transitions Proceedings, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 91–99, 2022.

[32] F. Pargent, F. Pfisterer, J. Thomas, and B. Bischl, "Regularized target encoding outperforms traditional methods in supervised machine learning with high cardinality features," Computational Statistics, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 2671–2692, 2022.

[33] J. Brownlee, "Ordinal and One-Hot Encodings for Categorical Data," Machine Learning Mastery, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://machinelearningmastery.com/one-hot-encoding-for-categorical-data/.

[34] K. A. Sankpal and K. V. Metre, "A Review on Data Normalization Techniques," Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol, vol. 9, pp. 1438, 2020.

[35] I. T. Jolliffe and J. Cadima, "Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 374, no. 2065, p. 20150202, 2016.

[36] W. Zhang, D. Yang, and H. Wang, "Data-driven methods for predictive maintenance of industrial equipment: A survey," IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2213–2227, 2019.

[37] Scikit-learn Developers, "Plot classification boundaries with different SVM Kernels," scikit-learn documentation, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/auto_examples/svm/plot_svm_kernels.html. [Accessed: 6-Aug-2025].

[38] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2009.

[39] A. Q. Khan, M. H. Naveed, M. D. Rasheed, and A. Pimanmas, "Prediction of stress–strain behavior of PET FRP-confined concrete using machine learning models," Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 7911–7931, 2025.

[40] P. Ghadekar et al., "Predictive maintenance for industrial equipment: Using XGBoost and local outlier factor with explainable AI for analysis," in 2024 14th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence), 2024, pp. 25–30.

[41] M. S. Mahmud, J. Z. Huang, S. Salloum, T. Z. Emara, and K. Sadatdiynov, "A survey of data partitioning and sampling methods to support big data analysis," Big Data Mining and Analytics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–101, 2020.

[42] A. Seraj et al., "Cross-validation," in Handbook of Hydroinformatics, Elsevier, 2023, pp. 89–105.

[43] F. Calabrese, A. Regattieri, M. Bortolini, F. G. Galizia, and L. Visentini, "Feature-based multi-class classification and novelty detection for fault diagnosis of industrial machinery," Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 20, p. 9580, 2021.

[44] C. Catal, "Performance evaluation metrics for software fault prediction studies," Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 193–206, 2012.

[45] L. Breiman, "Random forests," Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001.

[46] T. Chen and C. Guestrin, "Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system," in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 785–794.

[47] T. Adimulam, M. Bhoyar, and P. Reddy, "AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance in IoT-Enabled Industrial Systems," Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 398–410, 2019.

[48] C. M. Walker et al., "Explainable artificial intelligence technology for predictive maintenance," Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Falls, ID, USA, Report No. INL/RPT-23-74159-Rev000, 2023.

Downloads

Published

08-12-2025

How to Cite

1.
Masud SB, Sozib HM, Mishu KP, Bellal RB, Ahmed MT, Jony AM, et al. AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance in Infrastructure and Facilities Management. EAI Endorsed Trans AI Robotics [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 8 [cited 2025 Dec. 28];5. Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/airo/article/view/9975

Most read articles by the same author(s)