Prediction and Optimization of Wind Power Intelligent Performance Enhancement Systems Based on Big Data and Deep Learning

Authors

  • Jun He Hubei Energy Group New Energy Development Co., Ltd.
  • Biyu Chen Hubei Energy Group New Energy Development Co., Ltd.
  • Ling Mou Hubei Energy Group New Energy Development Co., Ltd.
  • Yi Zhou Hubei Energy Group New Energy Development Co., Ltd.
  • Gejun Chen Powerchina Huadong Engineering Corporation (China) image/svg+xml
  • Ke Li Powerchina Huadong Engineering Corporation (China) image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4144-7620

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.11903

Keywords:

Wind Turbine Blade, Edgewise Vibration, Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC), Vibration Suppression

Abstract

The suppression of edgewise vibration is critical for enhancing the operational safety and power generation efficiency of large-scale wind turbines. Conventional control strategies, such as PID, often lack the robustness required to handle the inherent model uncertainties and external disturbances in such complex systems. This paper proposes a novel application of an Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) framework for actively suppressing the edgewise vibration of wind turbine blades. A comprehensive physical model of the blade is first established, deriving the transfer function from actuator torque to edgewise displacement. A systematic frequency-domain analysis reveals the system's resonant characteristics, and an uncertainty analysis is conducted to quantify its sensitivity to parameter variations. The ADRC controller is then meticulously designed, leveraging its core capability to estimate and cancel the "total disturbance" in real-time. Through comparative simulations with a finely-tuned PID controller, the ADRC demonstrates superior performance, characterized by significantly smaller overshoot (36.66%), faster settling time, and enhanced resistance to load disturbances. The ADRC-controlled system settles down within 1.07 seconds while sustaining a 49.47° phase margin which provides sufficient stability protection. The root-mean-square (RMS) tracking error decreases to 0.015 under ongoing harmonic disturbances which shows a 63.4% improvement over the PID controller. The proposed method demonstrates better dynamic response capabilities and higher stability margins together with improved disturbance rejection performance according to these quantitative performance indicators. Crucially, the robustness of the proposed method is rigorously validated via extensive uncertainty analysis, showing that the closed-loop performance remains stable and effective despite ±10% parameter perturbations, whereas the PID control exhibits performance regression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Safaeinejad M., Rahimi D., Zhou D., Blaabjerg F., “A sensorless active control approach to mitigate fatigue loads arising from torsional and blade edgewise vibrations in PMSG-based wind turbine systems,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 155, 2024, Art. no. 109525.

[2] Zhang Z., Cheng J., Guo Y., “PD-based optimal active disturbance rejection control with improved linear extended state observer,” Entropy, vol. 23, no. 7, 2021, Art. no. 888.

[3] Naqash T.M., Alam M.M., “A state-of-the-art review of wind turbine blades: principles, flow-induced vibrations, failure, maintenance, and vibration suppression techniques,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 13, 2025, Art. no. 3319.

[4] Mosayyebi S.R., Mojallali H., Shahalami S.H., “Sensorless vector control of doubly fed induction generator based wind turbine using fuzzy fractional-order adaptive disturbance rejection control,” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, vol. 44, no. 2, 2022, pp. 4630–4663.

[5] Wei Y., Cao Z., Mal R., Liao M., “A review of blade vibration suppression methods for large-scale horizontal axis wind turbines,” in Advances in Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, Vibration, and Control – 2024, Springer Nature, 2025, pp. 255–264.

[6] Pinciroli L., Baraldi P., Ballabio G., et al., “Deep reinforcement learning based on proximal policy optimization for the maintenance of a wind farm with multiple crews,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 20, 2021, Art. no. 6743.

[7] Lydia M., Kumar G.E.P., “Machine learning applications in wind turbine generating systems,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 45, 2021, pp. 6411–6414.

[8] Zhang Z., Roh B.-H., Shan G., “Dynamic clustered federated framework for multi-domain network anomaly detection,” in Proceedings of the Companion of the 19th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies (CoNEXT 2023), ACM, New York, 2023, pp. 71–72.

[9] Jia H., Geng Y., Liu Y., Wang L., Meng E., Ji J., et al., “Linear active disturbance rejection control for large onshore wind turbines in full wind speed range,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 151, 2024, Art. no. 106038.

[10] Dong H., Zhang J., Zhao X., “Intelligent wind farm control via deep reinforcement learning and high-fidelity simulations,” Applied Energy, vol. 292, 2021, Art. no. 116928.

[11] Kipchirchir, Söffker D., “IPC-based robust disturbance accommodating control for load mitigation and speed regulation of wind turbines,” Wind Energy, vol. 27, no. 4, 2024, pp. 382–402.

[12] Torres J., Gil J., Plaza A., Aginaga J., “4P operational harmonic and blade vibration in wind turbines: a real case study of an active yaw system and a concrete tower,” Renewable Energy, vol. 227, 2024, Art. no. 120503.

[13] Padullaparthi V.R., Nagarathinam S., Vasan A., et al., “FALCON—farm level control for wind turbines using multi-agent deep reinforcement learning,” Renewable Energy, vol. 181, 2022, pp. 445–456.

[14] Kwatra C.V., Kaur H., Mangla M., Singh A., Tambe S.N., Potharaju S., “Early detection of gynecological malignancies using ensemble deep learning models: ResNet50 and Inception V3,” Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 2025, Art. no. 101620.

[15] Jumaili M.L.F., Sonuç E., “ML-driven Alzheimer’s disease prediction: a deep ensemble modeling approach,” SLAS Technology, 2025, Art. no. 100298.

[16] García-Ramírez R.A., Cruz-Aceves I., Hernández-Aguirre A., Trujillo-Sánchez G.P., Hernandez-González M.A., “Evolutionary-driven convolutional deep belief network for the classification of macular edema in retinal fundus images,” Journal of Imaging, vol. 11, no. 4, 2025, Art. no. 123.

[17] Hessein Y., “Kvasir dataset: gastrointestinal endoscopic images,” Kaggle Dataset, 2024.

[18] Aftab M., Mehmood F., Sahibzada K.I., Zhang C., Jiang Y., Liu K., “Attention-enhanced multi-task deep learning model for classification and segmentation of esophageal lesions,” ACS Omega, vol. 10, no. 10, 2025, pp. 10468–10479.

[19] Raju A.S.N., Venkatesh K., Gatla R.K., Eid M.M., Flah A., Slanina Z., Ghaly R.N., “Expedited colorectal cancer detection through a dexterous hybrid CADx system with enhanced image processing and augmented polyp visualization,” IEEE Access, 2025.

[20] Rakshit S., Sengupta A. R., “Comparison of machine learning and deep learning models performance in predicting wind energy,” EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web, vol. 12, 2024.

[21] Kumar P. M., Kamruzzaman M. M., Alfurhood B. S., Hossain B., Nagarajan H., Sitaraman S. R., “Balanced performance merit on wind and solar energy contact with clean environment enrichment,” IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society, vol. 12, 2024, pp. 808–823.

[22] Niu Y., Dwivedi A., Sathiaraj J., Lathi P.P., Nagamune R., “Floating offshore wind farm control via turbine repositioning: unlocking the potential unique to floating offshore wind,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 44, no. 5, 2024, pp. 106–129.

[23] Kipchirchir, Do M.H., Njiri J.G., Söffker D., “Adaptive robust observer-based control for structural load mitigation and speed regulation in commercial wind turbines,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, 2024, pp. 38335–38350.

[24] Eskandari, Vatankhah R., “Opposition-based particle swarm optimization-aided neural fractional-order PID pitch control for variable pitch wind turbines,” International Journal of Dynamics and Control, vol. 13, no. 6, 2025, Art. no. 216.

[25] Guo B.Z., Wu Z.H., “Output tracking for a class of nonlinear systems with matched uncertainties by active disturbance rejection control,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 100, 2017, pp. 21–31.

[26] Turhan B.B., Rezgui D., Azarpeyvand M., “Phase synchronisation for tonal noise reduction in a multi-rotor UAV,” Drones, vol. 9, no. 8, 2025, Art. no. 544.

[27] Jaber A.S., Mahdi H.B., Abdul-Jabbar T.A., Kotb H., AboRas K.M., Ghadi Y.Y., et al., “A comprehensive overview of wind turbine controller technology: emerging trends and challenges,” Wind Engineering, vol. 48, no. 5, 2024, pp. 954–975.

[28] Zhang X., Zhang S., Xiong F., Liu L., Zhang L., Han X., et al., “System identification and fractional-order proportional–integral–derivative control of a distributed piping system,” Fractal and Fractional, vol. 8, no. 2, 2024, Art. no. 122.

[29] Narayanan V.L., “Reinforcement learning in wind energy: a review,” International Journal of Green Energy, vol. 21, no. 9, 2024, pp. 1945–1968.

Downloads

Published

14-05-2026

How to Cite

1.
He J, Chen B, Mou L, Zhou Y, Chen G, Li K. Prediction and Optimization of Wind Power Intelligent Performance Enhancement Systems Based on Big Data and Deep Learning. EAI Endorsed Trans Energy Web [Internet]. 2026 May 14 [cited 2026 May 15];13. Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/ew/article/view/11903

Most read articles by the same author(s)