Capacity Optimization for Minimizing the Carbon Footprint of Power Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.12163Keywords:
Power system, Carbon footprint, Capacity optimization, Renewable energy, Energy storageAbstract
The carbon footprint of electricity supply is strongly influenced by power system capacity configuration and operational flexibility under uncertainty. This paper proposes a carbon-footprint-oriented capacity optimization framework for integrated power systems comprising thermal power, wind power, photovoltaic generation, and energy storage. A dispatch model is developed to represent coordinated system operation under uncertain load and renewable generation, which are modeled using information gap decision theory and Monte Carlo simulation. The carbon footprint of electricity supply is evaluated on a life-cycle basis as carbon emissions per unit of delivered electricity, together with electricity cost and power fluctuation rate as performance indicators. A multi-objective capacity optimization problem is solved using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), and a practical optimal solution is selected from the Pareto front using the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS). Case studies show that the optimized capacity configuration reduces the carbon footprint of electricity supply by approximately 28%, while electricity cost and power fluctuation rate decrease by about 7% and 27%, respectively. Meanwhile, renewable energy utilization increases from 71.4% to 86.8%, and the renewable energy share rises from 42.0% to 55.6%, demonstrating that coordinated deployment of renewable energy and energy storage is essential for achieving carbon-efficient electricity supply under uncertainty.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhao G, Yu B, An R, et al. Energy system transformations and carbon emission mitigation for China to achieve global 2 C climate target. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021; 292: 112721.
[2] Lopes J A P, Madureira A G, Matos M, et al. The future of power systems: Challenges, trends, and upcoming paradigms. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 2020; 9(3): e368.
[3] Chen S, Liu P, Li Z. Low carbon transition pathway of power sector with high penetration of renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020; 130: 109985.
[4] Guo X, Sun Y, Ren D. Life cycle carbon emission and cost-effectiveness analysis of electric vehicles in China. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2023; 72: 1-10.
[5] Frew B, Sergi B, Denholm P, et al. The curtailment paradox in the transition to high solar power systems. Joule, 2021; 5(5): 1143-1167.
[6] Li J, Ho M S, Xie C, et al. China's flexibility challenge in achieving carbon neutrality by 2060. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022; 158: 112112.
[7] He Y, Guo S, Zhou J, et al. Multi-objective planning-operation co-optimization of renewable energy system with hybrid energy storages. Renewable Energy, 2022; 184: 776-790.
[8] Rasool M H, Taylan O, Perwez U, et al. Comparative assessment of multi-objective optimization of hybrid energy storage system considering grid balancing. Renewable Energy, 2023; 216: 119107.
[9] Garmabdari R, Moghimi M, Yang F, et al. Multi-objective energy storage capacity optimisation considering Microgrid generation uncertainties. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2020; 119: 105908.
[10] Shen H, Zhang H, Xu Y, et al. Two stage robust economic dispatching of microgrid considering uncertainty of wind, solar and electricity load along with carbon emission predicted by neural network model. Energy, 2024; 300: 131571.
[11] Shafiei K, Seifi A, Hagh M T. A novel multi-objective optimization approach for resilience enhancement considering integrated energy systems with renewable energy, energy storage, energy sharing, and demand-side management. Journal of Energy Storage, 2025; 115: 115966.
[12] Frapin M, Roux C, Assoumou E, et al. Modelling long-term and short-term temporal variation and uncertainty of electricity production in the life cycle assessment of buildings. Applied Energy, 2022; 307: 118141.
[13] de Mars P, O’Sullivan A, Keppo I. Estimating the impact of variable renewable energy on base-load cycling in the GB power system. Energy, 2020; 195: 117041.
[14] Liu Z, Wang C, Fan M, et al. Investigation on the allowable load ram-up rate and wet-to-dry conversion time of a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant with deep peak-shaving work conditions. Energy, 2025; 314: 134200.
[15] Javed M S, Jurasz J, McPherson M, et al. Quantitative evaluation of renewable-energy-based remote microgrids: curtailment, load shifting, and reliability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022; 164: 112516.
[16] Xu C, Zhong P, Zhu F, et al. Real-time error correction for flood forecasting based on machine learning ensemble method and its uncertainty assessment. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2023; 37(4): 1557-1577.
[17] Li C, Feng C, Li J, et al. Comprehensive frequency regulation control strategy of thermal power generating unit and ESS considering flexible load simultaneously participating in AGC. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023; 58: 106394.
[18] Laugs G A H, Benders R M J, Moll H C. Balancing responsibilities: Effects of growth of variable renewable energy, storage, and undue grid interaction. Energy Policy, 2020; 139: 111203.
[19] Jayachandran M, Reddy C R, Padmanaban S, et al. Operational planning steps in smart electric power delivery system. Scientific Reports, 2021; 11(1): 17250.
[20] Bakare M S, Abdulkarim A, Zeeshan M, et al. A comprehensive overview on demand side energy management towards smart grids: challenges, solutions, and future direction. Energy Informatics, 2023; 6(1): 4.
[21] Amirifard M, Sinton R A, Kurtz S. How demand-side management can shape electricity generation capacity planning. Utilities Policy, 2024; 88: 101748.
[22] Wang J, Chen L, Tan Z, et al. Inherent spatiotemporal uncertainty of renewable power in China. Nature communications, 2023; 14(1): 5379.
[23] Xu X, Fu Y, Luo Y. Building energy flexibility with battery energy storage system: a comprehensive review. Discover Mechanical Engineering, 2022; 1(1): 4.
[24] De Lorenzi A, Gambarotta A, Marzi E, et al. Predictive control of a combined heat and power plant for grid flexibility under demand uncertainty. Applied Energy, 2022; 314: 118934.
[25] Çakır E, Hanilçi F, Kuyu Y Ç. Energy Storage Systems for Energy Justice and Equity. Communities for Clean Energy Justice and Equity in Grid Modernization, 2025; 217-305.
[26] Ahmed S, D’Angola A. Energy Storage Systems: Scope, Technologies, Characteristics, Progress, Challenges, and Future Suggestions—Renewable Energy Community Perspectives. Energies, 2025; 18(11): 2679.
[27] Njema G G, Ouma R B O, Kibet J K. A review on the recent advances in battery development and energy storage technologies. Journal of renewable energy, 2024; (1): 2329261.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Xinzhi Wang, Bo Chen, Yunpei Cheng

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 license, which permits unlimited use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.