Uncertainty Pattern Recognition of Multi-Type Renewable Power Plants and the Coupling Mechanism with Multi-Level Voltage Sensitivity

Authors

  • Xiaoyu Luo Laibin Power Supply Bureau of Guangxi Power Grid Co., Ltd.
  • Li Xiong Power Dispatch Control Center of Guangxi Power Grid Co., Ltd.
  • Lili Lv Laibin Power Supply Bureau of Guangxi Power Grid Co., Ltd.
  • Zhi Zhang Laibin Power Supply Bureau of Guangxi Power Grid Co., Ltd.
  • Yulong Li Laibin Power Supply Bureau of Guangxi Power Grid Co., Ltd.
  • Mingzhao Meng Laibin Power Supply Bureau of Guangxi Power Grid Co., Ltd.
  • Lei Zhuo Laibin Power Supply Bureau of Guangxi Power Grid Co., Ltd.
  • Xin Zhou Laibin Power Supply Bureau of Guangxi Power Grid Co., Ltd.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.12177

Keywords:

renewable power plant, uncertainty modeling, joint forecasting, spatio-temporal attention, voltage sensitivity, feature disentanglement

Abstract

With high penetrations of renewable power plants, increased output volatility and uncertainty exacerbate local voltage-stability risks. Targeting heterogeneous renewable facilities, this paper proposes an integrated analysis framework that couples deep feature disentanglement, joint forecasting, and multi-level voltage sensitivity. First, using event logs as the driver, we combine variational mode decomposition (VMD) with a residual convolutional autoencoder (Res-CAE) to extract multi-band disturbance modes from power time series. An adversarial mechanism is then employed to disentangle meteorological disturbances from device-driven behaviors, yielding canonical uncertainty labels dominated by high-/mid-frequency components. Next, a spatio-temporal attention–driven multi-task sequence model is designed to jointly forecast active/reactive power and nodal voltage, providing stable inputs for subsequent sensitivity assessment. Finally, dynamic voltage sensitivity is estimated via sliding-window regression, and the disturbance–response chain and its propagation scope are quantified across local, dynamic, and system-level tiers. Event-driven simulations on the SoCal 28-Bus benchmark indicate that, under high- and mid-frequency dominated scenarios, dynamic voltage sensitivity increases by approximately 58.3% relative to low-volatility regimes, revealing a nonlinear transition by which renewable uncertainty is amplified through multi-frequency modes toward critical nodes. The proposed paradigm offers a transferable pathway for modeling and predicting complex source–network coupling in renewable-dominated power systems and provides data support for proactive voltage-control strategy design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Shuai C, Deyou Y, Weichun G, et al. Global sensitivity analysis of voltage stability in the power system with correlated renewable energy. Electric Power Systems Research, 2021; 192: 106916.

[2] Liao X, Zhang M, Le J, et al. Global sensitivity analysis of static voltage stability based on extended affine model. Electric Power Systems Research, 2022; 208: 107872.

[3] Quanjun L, Huazhong S, Mingming L, et al. Complex affine arithmetic based uncertain sensitivity analysis of voltage fluctuations in active distribution networks. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2024; 12: 1374986.

[4] Alzaareer K, Saad M, Mehrjerdi H, et al. New voltage sensitivity analysis for smart distribution grids using analytical derivation: ABCD model. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2022; 137: 107799.

[5] Wang Y, Von Krannichfeldt L, Zufferey T, et al. Short-term nodal voltage forecasting for power distribution grids: An ensemble learning approach. Applied Energy, 2021; 304: 117880.

[6] Zufferey T, Renggli S, Hug G. Probabilistic state forecasting and optimal voltage control in distribution grids under uncertainty. Electric power systems research, 2020; 188: 106562.

[7] Toubeau J F, Teng F, Morstyn T, et al. Privacy-preserving probabilistic voltage forecasting in local energy communities. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2022; 14(1): 798-809.

[8] Dutta A, Ganguly S, Kumar C. Coordinated control scheme for EV charging and volt/var devices scheduling to regulate voltages of active distribution networks. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 2022; 31: 100761.

[9] Sun X, Qiu J, Yi Y, et al. Cost-effective coordinated voltage control in active distribution networks with photovoltaics and mobile energy storage systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2021; 13(1): 501-513.

[10] Liu Q, Guo Y, Deng L, et al. Two-critic deep reinforcement learning for inverter-based volt-var control in active distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2024; 15(3): 1768-1781.

[11] Wang Z, Zhu H, Zhang D, et al. Modelling of wind and photovoltaic power output considering dynamic spatio-temporal correlation. Applied Energy, 2023; 352: 121948.

[12] Cai Q, Qing J, Zhong C, et al. Temporal and spatial heterogeneity analysis of wind and solar power complementarity and source-load matching characteristics in China. Energy Conversion and Management, 2024; 315: 118770.

[13] Vincent C L, Dowdy A J. Multi-scale variability of southeastern Australian wind resources. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2024; 24(18): 10209-10223.

[14] Gallardo R P, Ríos A M, Ramírez J S. Analysis of the solar and wind energetic complementarity in Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020; 268: 122323.

[15] Xu J, Liu J, Wu Z, et al. Multi-area state estimation for active distribution networks under multiple uncertainties: an affine approach. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2024; 155: 109632.

[16] Marković M, Hodge B M. Model-Free Probabilistic Forecasting of Nodal Voltages in Distribution Systems. 2023 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). IEEE, 2023: 1-5.

[17] Du X, Lin X, Peng Z, et al. Chance-constrained optimal power flow based on a linearized network model. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2021; 130: 106890.

[18] Nejadfard‐jahromi S, Mohammadi M. Data‐driven look‐ahead voltage stability assessment of power system with correlated variables. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2022; 16(9): 1795-1807.

[19] Alnuman H, Abbas G, Yousef A. Power distribution and forecasting using a probabilistic and systematic data processing model for renewable resources. Scientific Reports, 2025; 15(1): 27370.

[20] Alemazkoor N, Meidani H. Fast probabilistic voltage control for distribution networks with distributed generation using polynomial surrogates. IEEE Access, 2020; 8: 73536-73546.

[21] Munikoti S, Natarajan B, Jhala K, et al. Probabilistic voltage sensitivity analysis to quantify impact of high PV penetration on unbalanced distribution system. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2021; 36(4): 3080-3092.

[22] Zhao Y, Liu J, Liu X, et al. Enhancing the tolerance of voltage regulation to cyber contingencies via graph-based deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2023; 39(2): 4661-4673.

[23] Zhang C, Xu Y, Wang Y, et al. Three-stage hierarchically-coordinated voltage/var control based on PV inverters considering distribution network voltage stability. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2021; 13(2): 868-881.

[24] Huo Y, Li P, Ji H, et al. Data-driven predictive voltage control for distributed energy storage in active distribution networks. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 2023; 10(5): 1876-1886.

[25] Xie Y, Werner L, Chen K, et al. A Digital Twin of an Electrical Distribution Grid: SoCal 28-Bus Dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06588, 2025.

Downloads

Published

14-04-2026

How to Cite

1.
Luo X, Xiong L, Lv L, Zhang Z, Li Y, Meng M, et al. Uncertainty Pattern Recognition of Multi-Type Renewable Power Plants and the Coupling Mechanism with Multi-Level Voltage Sensitivity. EAI Endorsed Trans Energy Web [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 14 [cited 2026 Apr. 14];12. Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/ew/article/view/12177

Most read articles by the same author(s)