Analysis of optimal scheduling and energy-saving measures for shipyard microgrid based on IMOPSO algorithm

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.13144

Keywords:

Microgrid Optimization, MOPSO Algorithm, Shipyard Energy Consumption, Energy-saving Measures, Multi-objective Trade-offs

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This research study presents the development of a microgrid system specifically designed for a shipyard environment based on the energy consumption characteristics of major shipyard equipment.

OBJECTIVES: The algorithm simultaneously optimizes three different objectives as follows: (1) economic cost; (2) carbon emission; and (3) power fluctuation (stability).

METHODS: To accomplish the objective of creating an optimal microgrid configuration, the IMOPSO was used to solve the microgrid model.

RESULTS: Results indicate that there are considerable trade-offs between economic cost versus carbon emission and between economic cost versus power fluctuation, which require optimally balanced approaches in order to meet all the different objectives. Among various energy-saving measures, the adoption of the dehumidification system with heat recovery wheel proves especially effective in reducing power consumption, economic cost and carbon emission.

CONCLUSION: Pareto front analysis reveals that the weak emission-fluctuation conflict creates an opportunity to effectively balance the critical cost-emission trade-off for obtaining superior solutions. Equipment energy-saving measures, particularly the dehumidification with heat recovery and hybrid welding, significantly improve the microgrid's economic and environmental performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. Xue, J. Xie, F. Chen, X. Ke, T. Xu, H. Hou, “Review on Multi-objective Joint Economic Dispatching of Microgrid in Power System”, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 130, 2018, pp. 1152–1157.

[2] Z. Li and Y. Xu, “Optimal coordinated energy dispatch of a multi-energy microgrid in grid-connected and islanded modes”, Applied Energy, vol. 210, Jan. 2018, pp. 974–986.

[3] Z. Guan, H. Wang, Z. Li, X. Luo, X. Yang, J. Fang, Q. Zhao, “Multi-Objective Optimal Scheduling of Microgrids Based on Improved Particle Swarm Algorithm”, Energies, vol. 17, no. 7, Apr. 2024, pp. 1760.

[4] X. Ma, Y. Mu, Y. Zhang, C. Zang, S. Li, X. Jiang, M. Cui, “Multi-objective microgrid optimal dispatching based on improved bird swarm algorithm”, Global Energy Interconnection, vol. 5, no. 2, Apr. 2022, pp. 154–167.

[5] T.-T. Nguyen, T.-G. Ngo, T.-K. Dao, T.-T.-T. Nguyen, “Microgrid Operations Planning Based on Improving the Flying Sparrow Search Algorithm”, Symmetry, vol. 14, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 168.

[6] V. Tiwari, H. M. Dubey, M. Pandit, S. R. Salkuti, “Economic Dispatch in Microgrid with Battery Storage System using Wild Geese Algorithm”, Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation, Jan. 2025, pp. 100263.

[7] B. Dai, H. Wang, B. Li, C. Li, Z. Tan, “Capacity model and optimal scheduling strategy of multi-microgrid based on shared energy storage”, Energy, vol. 306, Oct. 2024, pp. 132472.

[8] Y.-L. He, X.-W. Wu, K. Sun, X.-Y. Liu, H.-P. Wang, S.-M. Zeng, Y. Zhang, “A Novel MOWSO algorithm for Microgrid multi-objective optimal dispatch”, Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 232, July 2024, pp. 110374.

[9] X. Wu, Y. Shan, K. Fan, “A Modified Particle Swarm Algorithm for the Multi-Objective Optimization of Wind/Photovoltaic/Diesel/Storage Microgrids”, Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 3, Jan. 2024, pp. 1065.

[10] X. Wang, Z. Li, X. Luo, Y. Zhang, X. Guan, “A Bi-level optimization dispatch for hybrid shipboard microgrid considering electricity-gas-heat coupling”, Green Energy and Resources, vol. 2, no. 2, June 2024, pp. 100070.

[11] A. Ouammi, Y. Achour, H. Dagdougui, D. Zejli, “Optimal operation scheduling for a smart greenhouse integrated microgrid”, Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 58, Oct. 2020, pp. 129–137.

[12] M. Ghadi-sahebi and R. Ebrahimi, “Stochastic scenario based microgrid energy management with electric vehicles considering uncertainty sources”, U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series C, vol. 82, Iss. 1, 2020, pp. 259-276.

[13] F. Cheng, G. Shi, H. Lu, R. Gao, S. Yu, C. Song, J. Zhu, G. Xiao, K. Wu, “An example analysis of energy-saving improvement based on air compressor inlet pre-treatment”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2674, no. 1, Dec. 2023, pp. 012016.

[14] Y. Hu, W. Xu, G. Jia, G. Li, M. Cai, “Energy Analysis of Precooling Air Compressor System”, Entropy, vol. 24, no. 8, July 2022, pp. 1035.

[15] U. Hummel, P. Radgen, S. Ülker, R. Schelle, “Findings from Measurements of the Electric Power Demand of Air Compressors”, Energies, vol. 14, no. 24, Dec. 2021, pp. 8395.

[16] L. Liu, C. Li, J. Shi, “Analysis of energy utilisation efficiency in laser–GTA hybrid welding process”, Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, vol. 19, no. 7, Oct. 2014, pp. 541–546.

[17] A. Mahrle, S. Rose, M. Schnick, E. Beyer, U. Füssel, “Laser-assisted plasma arc welding of stainless steel”, Journal of Laser Applications, vol. 25, no. 3, May 2013.

[18] L. Chen, S. H. Chen, L. Liu, B. Zhang, “Experimental investigation of precooling desiccant-wheel air-conditioning system in a high-temperature and high-humidity environment”, International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 95, Nov. 2018, pp. 83–92.

[19] R. S. Srivastava, A. Kumar, S. Sharma, H. Thakur, S. Patel, R. Vaish, “Development and applications of thermoelectric based dehumidifiers”, Energy and Buildings, vol. 252, Dec. 2021, pp. 111446.

[20] Á. M. Costa, R. Bouzón, D. Vergara, J. A. Orosa, “Eco-friendly Pressure Drop Dehumidifier: An Experimental and Numerical Analysis”, Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 7, Apr. 2019, pp. 2170.

[21] X. Qu, M. Zhao, Q. Qi, “Research on energy consumption evaluation and energy-saving design of cranes in service based on structure-mechanism coupling”, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 16, no. 9, Sept. 2024.

[22] M. Kłodawski, R. Jachimowski, N. Chamier-Gliszczyński, “Analysis of the Overhead Crane Energy Consumption Using Different Container Loading Strategies in Urban Logistics Hubs”, Energies, vol. 17, no. 5, Feb. 2024, pp. 985.

[23] S. Fei, G. Zhihao, T. Yifei, L. Xiangdong, “Characteristics analyses of energy consumption for bridge crane based on the energy flow”, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 758, no. 1, Feb. 2020, pp. 012002.

[24] L. C. R. Jones, N. Goffin, J. Ouyang, N. Mirhossein, J. Xiong, Y. Li, L. Li, J. Tyrer, Z. Liu, E. Woolley, Y. He, G. Mi, P. Mativenga, “Laser specific energy consumption: How do laser systems compare to other manufacturing processes?”, Journal of Laser Applications, vol. 34, no. 4, Nov. 2022, pp. 042029.

Downloads

Published

21-07-2026

Issue

Section

Digital Twin Technologies for Smart Energy Systems

How to Cite

1.
Li W, Du J, Wang J, Fu T, Zhu S. Analysis of optimal scheduling and energy-saving measures for shipyard microgrid based on IMOPSO algorithm. EAI Endorsed Trans Energy Web [Internet]. 2026 Jul. 21 [cited 2026 Jul. 21];13. Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/ew/article/view/13144