Life Cycle Cost Modeling and Financial Benefit Assessment of Energy Storage Systems Incorporating Digital Twins

Authors

  • Lichang Zhang Jiaozuo Power Supply Company, State Grid Henan Electric Power Company

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.13900

Keywords:

digital twin, energy storage system, life-cycle cost, financial benefit assessment, cost flow generation algorithm

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Energy storage systems are increasingly evaluated under dynamic operating conditions in which battery degradation, efficiency decay, maintenance events, replacement timing, outage losses, and residual value jointly affect investment returns. However, conventional life-cycle cost and financial assessment methods mainly depend on static annual assumptions, making it difficult to explain how operational states are transformed into cost events and how these events change cash flow.

OBJECTIVES: This paper proposes a digital twin-driven economic health assessment model for life-cycle cost modeling and financial benefit evaluation of energy storage systems. Its main contribution is an economic state space that synchronizes SOC, SOH, temperature, depth of discharge, cycle count, conversion efficiency, alarm records, maintenance status, and life-cycle stage labels with cost-event generation.

METHODS: A window-level state mapping mechanism is further developed to identify available capacity, degradation level, efficiency loss, maintenance and replacement triggers, outage costs, and residual value recovery, and to aggregate them into annual cost streams. Based on the same cost streams and scenario revenue parameters, NPV, IRR, PBP, and LCOS are calculated through a unified financial evaluation chain.

RESULTS: Experiments on an industrial energy storage project show that the proposed model achieves an SOH mean absolute error of 0.82%, a total life-cycle cost error of 2.18%, an NPV of 7.18 million yuan, and an LCOS of 0.533 RMB·kWh⁻¹ under the cost-aware dynamic operating strategy.

CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that the model improves the traceability and adaptability of energy storage economic assessment and provides analytical decision support for dispatch and maintenance planning; automatic actuation of the physical asset is outside the scope of the present study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Naseri F, Gil S, Barbu C, et al. Digital twin of electric vehicle battery systems: Comprehensive review of the use cases, requirements, and platforms[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2023, 179: 113280.

[2] Semeraro C, Olabi A G, Aljaghoub H, et al. Digital twin application in energy storage: Trends and challenges[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 58: 106347.

[3] Salaorni D, Bianchi F, Colnago S, et al. A novel digital twin for battery energy storage systems in microgrids[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2025, 132: 117745.

[4] Safavi V, Bazmohammadi N, Vasquez J C, et al. Battery state-of-health estimation: A step toward battery digital twins[J]. Electronics, 2024, 13(3): 587.

[5] Wongdet P, Boonraksa T, Boonraksa P, et al. Optimal capacity and cost analysis of battery energy storage systems in standalone microgrids considering battery lifetime[J]. Batteries, 2023, 9(2): 76.

[6] Stanchev P, Hinov N. Comparative Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment of Stationary Energy Storage Systems: Lithium-Ion, Lead-Acid, and Hydrogen[J]. Batteries, 2025, 11(10): 382.

[7] Migliari L, Cocco D, Petrollese M. Levelized cost of storage (LCOS) of battery energy storage systems (BESS) deployed for photovoltaic curtailment mitigation[J]. Energies, 2025, 18(14): 3602.

[8] Mulder S, Klein S. Techno-economic comparison of electricity storage options in a fully renewable energy system[J]. Energies, 2024, 17(5): 1084.

[9] Issa R, Badr M M, Shalash O, et al. A data-driven digital twin for estimating the state-of-charge of electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries enabled by driving behavior application programming interfaces[J]. Batteries, 2023, 9(10): 521.

[10] Al‐Shetwi A Q, Atawi I E, El‐Hameed M A, et al. Digital Twin Technology for Renewable Energy, Smart Grids, Energy Storage, and Vehicle‐to‐Grid Integration: Advancements, Applications, Key Players, Challenges, and Future Perspectives in Modernizing Sustainable Grids[J]. IET Smart Grid, 2025, 8(1): e70026.

[11] Emrani A, Berrada A. A comprehensive review on the techno-economic assessment of hybrid energy storage systems integrated with renewable energy[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 84: 111010.

[12] Iqbal H, Sarwar S, Kirli D, et al. A survey of second-life batteries based on a techno-economic perspective and application-based analysis[J]. Carbon Neutrality, 2023, 2(1): 8.

[13] Agajie T F, Ali A, Fopah-Lele A, et al. A comprehensive review on the techno-economic analysis and optimal sizing of hybrid renewable energy sources with energy storage systems[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(2): 642.

[14] Barata F, Sousa J, Viveiros C, et al. Techno-economic assessment of battery energy storage systems in renewable energy communities[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 2025, 44: 59–72.

[15] Agajie T F, Ibrahim F S, Amoussou I, et al. Comparative techno-economic analysis of grid-connected solar PV-battery and PV-fuel cell systems for sustainable academic laboratories in educational institutions[J]. Discover Sustainability, 2025, 6(1): 674.

[16] Chatzigeorgiou N G, Theocharides S, Makrides G, et al. A review on battery energy storage systems: Applications, developments, and research trends of hybrid installations in the end-user sector[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 86: 111192.

[17] Adeyinka A M, Esan O C, Ijaola A O, et al. Advancements in hybrid energy storage systems for enhancing renewable energy-to-grid integration[J]. Sustainable Energy Research, 2024, 11(1): 26.

[18] Adeyemo A A, Tedeschi E. Technology suitability assessment of battery energy storage systems for high-energy applications on offshore oil and gas platforms[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(18): 6490.

[19] Tziovani L, Hadjidemetriou L, Timotheou S. Optimizing the bidding strategy and assessing the profitability of over-installed renewable plants equipped with battery energy storage systems[J]. Renewable Energy, 2024, 234: 121247.

[20] Khosravani A, Sieving J K, Billings B W, et al. Techno-economic analysis of long-duration energy storage integrated with high-penetration renewable energy systems[J]. Energy Reports, 2025, 14: 4086–4110.

[21] Barabino E, Fioriti D, Guerrazzi E, et al. Energy Communities: A review on trends, energy system modeling, business models, and optimization objectives[J]. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 2023, 36: 101187.

[22] Aranzabal I, Gomez-Cornejo J, López I, et al. Optimal management of an energy community with PV and battery energy storage systems[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(2): 789.

[23] Gwabavu M, Bansal R C, Naidoo R M. A review of onshore wind farm battery energy storage systems for techno-economic optimization[J]. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 2025, 45(6): 2237–2256.

[24] Borerwe C, Longe O M. Techno-economic analysis of large-scale battery energy storage systems for stationary applications in South Africa[J]. Engineering Research Express, 2025, 7(1): 012301.

[25] Adeyinka A M, Esan O C, Ijaola A O, et al. Advancements in hybrid energy storage systems for enhancing renewable energy-to-grid integration. Sustainable Energy Research, 11 (1)[EB/OL]. (2024)

Downloads

Published

17-09-2026

Issue

Section

AI-Powered Hybrid Energy Storage Optimization for Grid Cost-Efficiency and Stability

How to Cite

1.
Zhang L. Life Cycle Cost Modeling and Financial Benefit Assessment of Energy Storage Systems Incorporating Digital Twins. EAI Endorsed Trans Energy Web [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 17 [cited 2026 Sep. 17];13. Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/ew/article/view/13900