Mechanism–Data Dual-Driven Outage Identification Framework for Distribution Networks with High Penetration of Inverter-Based Distributed Generation

Authors

  • Ning Liu State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Company (China) image/svg+xml
  • Xiaopeng Zhang State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Company (China) image/svg+xml
  • Xudong Wang State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Company (China) image/svg+xml
  • Guodong Li State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Research Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.14541

Keywords:

Active distribution network, distributed generation, outage identification, Dempster–Shafer evidence theory, graph neural network

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: High penetration of inverter-based distributed generators (IBDGs) changes power-flow patterns and fault transients in distribution networks, reducing the effectiveness of conventional outage identification. Under the adopted low-voltage ride-through control model, IBDG fault currents are limited to 1.2–1.5 times the rated current, weakening protection discrimination and degrading classifiers trained on conventional fault features.

OBJECTIVES: To address the aforementioned challenges, this paper proposes a mechanism–data dual-driven outage identification framework for distribution networks with high levels of renewable energy penetration.

METHODS: The framework integrates improved weighted Dempster–Shafer (D–S) evidence theory for multi-source fusion, constructs an IBDG-aware fault-feature library covering converter-specific transient behaviors, and designs decision rules linking post-fault analysis with early fault warning.

RESULTS: Under the tested feeder, DG operating schemes, fault cases, and measurement-noise conditions, the proposed method achieved an F1-score of 96.8%. Its measured model-inference-and-fusion latency was 38 ms, compared with 120 ms for the reference implementation.

CONCLUSION: Under the tested feeder, operating schemes, fault cases, and measurement-noise conditions, the proposed method also achieved higher outage-identification performance than the implemented comparison methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Saxena V, Manna S, Rajput SK, et al. Navigating the complexities of distributed generation: integration, challenges, and solutions. Energy Rep. 2024;12:3302-3322.

[2] Majeed AA, Altaie AS, Abderrahim M, et al. A review of protection schemes for electrical distribution networks with green distributed generation. Energies. 2023;16(22):7587.

[3] Tang L, Han Y, Zalhaf AS, et al. Resilience enhancement of active distribution networks under extreme disaster scenarios: a comprehensive overview of fault location strategies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2024;189:113898.

[4] Liao Y, Weng Y, Tan CW, et al. Quick line outage identification in urban distribution grids via smart meters. CSEE J Power Energy Syst. 2022;8(4):1074-1086.

[5] Ibrahim AHM, Sadanandan SK, Ghaoud T, et al. Incipient fault detection in power distribution networks: review, analysis, challenges, and future directions. IEEE Access. 2024;12:112822-112838.

[6] Nsaif YM, Lipu MSH, Ayob A, et al. Fault detection and protection schemes for distributed generation integrated to distribution network: challenges and suggestions. IEEE Access. 2021;9:142693-142717.

[7] Nguyen BLH, Vu TV, Nguyen TT, et al. Spatial-temporal recurrent graph neural networks for fault diagnostics in power distribution systems. IEEE Access. 2023;11:46039-46050.

[8] Liang L, Zhang H, Cao S, et al. Fault location method for distribution networks based on multi-head graph attention networks. Front Energy Res. 2024;12:1395737.

[9] Lu T, Hou S. Fault location algorithm for distribution network with distributed generation based on domain-adaptive TGATv2. IET Gener Transm Distrib. 2025;19(1):e70033.

[10] Ma X, Zhen W, Ren H, et al. A method for fault localization in distribution networks with high proportions of distributed generation based on graph convolutional networks. Energies. 2024;17(22):5758.

[11] Ma W, Jiang Y, Luo X. A flexible rule for evidential combination in Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence. Appl Soft Comput. 2019;85:105512.

[12] Huang B, Wang J. Applications of physics-informed neural networks in power systems-a review. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2023;38(1):572-588.

[13] Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys. 2019;378:686-707.

[14] Zhou Y, Lin H, Liu L, et al. Robust fault location in distribution networks under noisy and incomplete measurements using physics-aware decoupled inference. Energies. 2026;19(11):2583.

[15] Arif A, Wang Z, Wang J, et al. Power distribution system outage management with co-optimization of repairs, reconfiguration, and DG dispatch. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2018;9(5):4109-4118.

[16] Malek AF, Mokhlis H, Mansor NN, et al. Power distribution system outage management using improved resilience metrics for smart grid applications. Energies. 2023;16(9):3953.

[17] Jacob RA, Paul S, Chowdhury S, et al. Real-time outage management in active distribution networks using reinforcement learning over graphs. Nat Commun. 2024;15:4766.

[18] Haddadi A, Zhao M, Kocar I, et al. Impact of inverter-based resources on negative sequence quantities-based protection elements. IEEE Trans Power Deliv. 2021;36(1):289-298.

[19] Kim I. A calculation method for the short-circuit current contribution of current-control inverter-based distributed generation sources at balanced conditions. Electr Power Syst Res. 2021;190:106839.

[20] "IEEE Standard for Interconnection and Interoperability of Distributed Energy Resources with Associated Electric Power Systems Interfaces," in IEEE Std 1547-2018 (Revision of IEEE Std 1547-2003) , vol., no., pp.1-138, 6 April 2018, doi: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2018.8332112.

[21] Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 1997;9(8):1735-1780.

[22] Kipf TN, Welling M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR); 2017; Toulon, France.

[23] Veličković P, Cucurull G, Casanova A, et al. Graph attention networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR); 2018; Vancouver, BC, Canada.

[24] Tang Y, Zhang X, Zhou Y, et al. A new correlation belief function in Dempster-Shafer evidence theory and its application in classification. Sci Rep. 2023;13:7609.

[25] Rajora GL, Sanz-Bobi MA, Tjernberg LB, et al. A review of asset management using artificial intelligence-based machine learning models: applications for the electric power and energy system. IET Gener Transm Distrib. 2024;18(12):2155-2170.

Downloads

Published

17-09-2026

Issue

Section

Digital Twin Technologies for Smart Energy Systems

How to Cite

1.
Liu N, Zhang X, Wang X, Li G. Mechanism–Data Dual-Driven Outage Identification Framework for Distribution Networks with High Penetration of Inverter-Based Distributed Generation. EAI Endorsed Trans Energy Web [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 17 [cited 2026 Sep. 17];13. Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/ew/article/view/14541