A Privacy-Preserving Decentralized Partition-Autonomous Planning Method for Interconnected Multi-Microgrid Distribution Systems Driven by Federated Proximal Policy Optimization

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.14639

Keywords:

Federated Learning, Proximal Policy Optimization, Differential Privacy, Multi-Substation Distribution System, Privacy-Preserving Decentralized Planning

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The rapid integration of distributed renewable energy and ICT infrastructure has made interconnected multi-microgrid distribution systems essential for low-carbon power grids, yet centralized coordination exposes sensitive operational data to privacy risks, including eavesdropping and membership inference attacks under 5G and edge computing environments.
OBJECTIVES: This study resolves the tension between data privacy protection and decentralized collaborative planning by developing a unified federated reinforcement learning framework with formal privacy guarantees.
METHODS: A privacy-preserving decentralized partition-autonomous planning method driven by federated proximal policy optimization is proposed. The network is divided into autonomous units, each performing local proximal policy optimization on local observations. A proximal term constrains update steps against Non-IID drift. A time-period adaptive differential privacy budget mechanism dynamically adjusts noise according to gradient sensitivity, complemented by a Shamir secret sharing-based secure aggregation protocol forming dual-layer protection.
RESULTS: Experiments on the Baran-Wu 33-node test system show daily operational cost within 3.0% of the centralized benchmark, per round communication reduced by approximately 80% to 9.6 MB, voltage compliance at 98.4%, and membership inference attack AUC suppressed to 0.521
DISCUSSION: The adaptive privacy budget reduces utility loss by 3.2 percentage points under strict privacy constraints versus fixed schemes, while secure aggregation maintains reliability under one PAU dropout with only 0.38% deviation. 
CONCLUSION: The proposed framework provides a feasible technical path for secure collaborative planning of large-scale interconnected multi-microgrid systems under practical ICT constraints.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Joshi A, et al. Survey on AI and machine learning techniques for microgrid energy management systems. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin. 2023;10(7):1513-1529.

[2] Zhao J, et al. Deep reinforcement learning-based model-free on-line dynamic multi-microgrid formation to enhance resilience. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2022;13(4):2557-2567.

[3] Liu G, et al. Distributed energy management for networked microgrids embedded modern distribution system using ADMM algorithm. IEEE Access. 2023;11:102589-102604.

[4] Liu G, et al. Microgrid optimal scheduling with chance-constrained islanding capability. Electr Power Syst Res. 2017;145:197-206.

[5] Lee S, Choi DH. Federated reinforcement learning for energy management of multiple smart homes with distributed energy resources. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2020;18(1):488-497.

[6] Mukherjee S, et al. Resilient control of networked microgrids using vertical federated reinforcement learning: designs and real-time test-bed validations. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2024;16(2):1897-1910.

[7] Cao D, et al. Deep reinforcement learning based approach for optimal power flow of distribution networks embedded with renewable energy and storage devices. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy. 2021;9(5):1101-1110.

[8] Guo C, et al. Real-time optimal energy management of microgrid with uncertainties based on deep reinforcement learning. Energy. 2022;238:121873.

[9] Ye Y, et al. A scalable privacy-preserving multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach for large-scale peer-to-peer transactive energy trading. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2021;12(6):5185-5200.

[10] 1She B, et al. Fusion of model-free reinforcement learning with microgrid control: review and vision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.11398. 2022.

[11] Baran ME, Wu FF. Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing. IEEE Trans Power Deliv. 1989;4(2):1401-1407.

[12] Zimmerman RD, Murillo-Sánchez CE, Thomas RJ. MATPOWER: steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2010;26(1):12-19.

[13] Wilson E, et al. End-use load profiles for the US building stock. Golden (CO): National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2021. ….

[14] Liu H, Wu W. Federated reinforcement learning for decentralized voltage control in distribution networks. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2022;13(5):3840-3843.

[15] Chen X, et al. Reinforcement learning for selective key applications in power systems: recent advances and future challenges. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2022;13(4):2935-2958.

[16] Hu D, et al. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for voltage control with coordinated active and reactive power optimization. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2022;13(6):4873-4886.

[17] Zhou X, et al. Accelerated voltage regulation in multi-phase distribution networks based on hierarchical distributed algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2019;35(3):2047-2058.

[18] Li T, et al. Federated learning: challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2020;37(3):50-60.

[19] Abadi M, et al. Deep learning with differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security; 2016.

[20] Bonawitz K, et al. Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security; 2017.

[21] Wei K, et al. Federated learning with differential privacy: algorithms and performance analysis. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2020;15:3454-3469.

[22] Mironov I. Rényi differential privacy. In: 2017 IEEE 30th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF). IEEE; 2017.

[23] Bai L, et al. Membership inference attacks and defenses in federated learning: a survey. ACM Comput Surv. 2024;57(4):1-35.

[24] Shokri R, et al. Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE; 2017.

[25] Li T, et al. Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks. Proc Mach Learn Syst. 2020;2:429-450.

[26] Yin X, Zhu Y, Hu J. A comprehensive survey of privacy-preserving federated learning: a taxonomy, review, and future directions. ACM Comput Surv. 2021;54(6):1-36.

[27] Badr MM, et al. Privacy-preserving and communication-efficient energy prediction scheme based on federated learning for smart grids. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023;10(9):7719-7736.

Downloads

Published

12-10-2026

How to Cite

1.
Duan Y, Cheng R, Gao C. A Privacy-Preserving Decentralized Partition-Autonomous Planning Method for Interconnected Multi-Microgrid Distribution Systems Driven by Federated Proximal Policy Optimization. EAI Endorsed Trans Energy Web [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 12 [cited 2026 Oct. 12];13. Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/ew/article/view/14639