Transformer-LSTM-Attention Deep LearningPrediction and Multi-Time-ScaleError-Compensation Optimization forHydro-Wind-PV-Storage Clean Energy Bases UsingCascade-Hydropower Reserve

Authors

  • Weijie Zhao Kunming Bureau of CSG EHV Transmission Company , Yunnan Provincial UHVDC Smart O&M and Safe Operation Engineering Research Center
  • Yi Jiang Kunming Bureau of CSG EHV Transmission Company , Yunnan Provincial UHVDC Smart O&M and Safe Operation Engineering Research Center
  • Yuxin Xie Kunming Bureau of CSG EHV Transmission Company , Yunnan Provincial UHVDC Smart O&M and Safe Operation Engineering Research Center
  • Panfeng Guo China Three Gorges University image/svg+xml
  • Lingfei Li Electric Power Research Institute, CSG , Yunnan Provincial UHVDC Smart O&M and Safe Operation Engineering Research Center
  • Zhixiong Huang Guangdong Tianguang Energy Technology Development Co., Ltd.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.15097

Keywords:

TRansformer-LSTM-attention, Deep learning prediction, Multi-time-scale optimization, Hydro-wind-PV-storage clean energy base, Net-load error compensation, Cascade hydropower reserve, Ancillary-service compensation

Abstract

High wind and photovoltaic (PV) penetration propagates forecast errors across day-ahead, intraday and real-time dispatch and increases short-term regulation demand. This paper proposes a Transformer-LSTM-attention deep learning prediction and multi-time-scale error-compensation optimization strategy for a hydro–wind–PV–storage clean energy base. The prediction module generates load, wind, PV and runoff forecasts at 1 h, 15 min and 1 min resolutions by combining temporal feature extraction, sequence modeling and attention weighting. The dispatch model represents residual load, wind and PV errors as a net-load deviation and converts quantile-based, or source-wise conservative, error margins into day-ahead and intraday cascade-hydropower reserve requirements. In real-time operation, the configured hydropower reserve compensates minute-level deviations, with storage and thermal units providing supplementary regulation under ramping, operating and network constraints. A case study is conducted on a Southwest China cascade-basin hydro–wind–PV–storage base with four cascade hydropower stations and a modified 30-bus equivalent local-grid system. The day-ahead MAPE values are 5.79%, 0.79% and 0.52% for wind, PV and load. Compared with fixed reserve, the proposed strategy reduces day-ahead-to-intraday hydropower fluctuation errors from 8.42% to 4.81% and from 7.48% to 6.02%; intraday-to-real-time errors decrease from 8.27% to 6.84% and from 8.44% to 8.09%. The power-supply guarantee rate remains 100.00%, while the required storage power capacity decreases by 34.00% and 32.11%. These results show improved cross-stage dispatch consistency and lower short-term storage regulation demand under the tested high-renewable operating conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] IRENA. Renewable capacity statistics 2025 [R]. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency, 2025.

[2] Yu A, Lu S, O’Malia K, Prasad S. China continues to lead the world in wind and solar, with twice as much capacity under construction as the rest of the world combined [R]. Global Energy Monitor, 2024.

[3] Tian C, Tan Q, Fang G, Wen X. Hydrogen production to combat power surpluses in hybrid hydro–wind–photovoltaic power systems [J]. Applied Energy, 2024, 371: 123627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123627.

[4] Huang K, Liu P, Ming B, Kim J S, Gong Y. Economic operation of a wind–solar–hydro complementary system considering risks of output shortage, power curtailment and spilled water [J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 290: 116805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116805.

[5] Li W, He M, Wan Z, Dai F, Zhang T, Jiang Y. Long-term optimal scheduling of cascade hydro–wind–PV complementary system based on deep deterministic policy gradient [J]. Applied Sciences, 2026, 16(10): 4630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104630.

[6] Salman D, Direkoglu C, Kusaf M, Fahrioglu M. Hybrid deep learning models for time series forecasting of solar power [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2024, 36: 9095–9112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09558-5.

[7] Yu W, Li S, Zhang H, Kang Y, Li H, Dong H. Ultra-short-term wind-power forecasting based on an optimized CNN–BiLSTM–attention model [J]. iEnergy, 2024, 3(4): 268–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/IEN.2024.0026.

[8] Bispo Junior D A, Leite G N P, Droguett E L, et al. Short-term wind power forecasting with transformer-based models enhanced by Time2Vec and efficient attention [J]. Energies, 2025, 18(23): 6162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236162.

[9] Gao Q. Multi-temporal scale wind power forecast-ing based on Lasso–CNN–LSTM–LightGBM [J]. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web, 2024, 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.5792.

[10] Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Pan D, Sun M, Mei H, Cao W. Distributed photovoltaic power prediction considering spatiotemporal correlation and dual Attention–LSTM [J]. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web, 2025, 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.7530.

[11] Wang J, Yuan W, Zhang S, Cheng S, Han L. Implementing ultra-short-term wind power forecasting without information leakage through cascade decomposition and attention mechanism [J]. Energy, 2024, 312: 133513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133513.

[12] Liu W, Mao Z. Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting with feature extraction and attention mechanisms [J]. Renewable Energy, 2024, 226: 120437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120437.

[13] Han L, Zhang R, Wang X, Dong Y. Multi-time scale rolling economic dispatch for wind/storage power system based on forecast error feature extraction [J]. Energies, 2018, 11(8): 2124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082124.

[14] Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao Z, Zhou Z, Hou Z. Multi-timescale optimal operation strategy for renewable energy power systems based on inertia evaluation [J]. Energies, 2023, 16(8): 3577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083577.

[15] Huo J, Liu Y, Zhang Y. A multi-source multi-timescale cooperative optimiza-tion [J]. Energies, 2026, 19(3): 721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en19030721.

[16] Zhang X, Campana P E, Bi X, Egusquiza M, Xu B, Wang C, Guo H, Chen D, Egusquiza E. Capacity configuration of a hydro–wind–solar–storage bundling system with transmission constraints of the receiving-end power grid and its techno-economic evaluation [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 270: 116177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116177.

[17] Shi L, Duanmu C, Wu F, He S, Lee K Y. Optimal allocation of energy storage capacity for hydro–wind–solar multi-energy renewable energy system with nested multiple time scales [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 446: 141357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141357.

[18] Oureilidis K, Malamaki K-N, Gallos K, et al. Ancillary services market design in distribution networks: review and identification of barriers [J]. Energies, 2020, 13(4): 917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040917.

[19] Liu F, Su Y, Liu Y, Chen D, Chen W, Kuang L. Reserve allocation of high-penetration renewable energy grids considering frequency security [J]. Fron-tiers in Energy Research, 2024, 12: 1501711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1501711.

[20] Sun F, Li Q, Wang W. Frequency regulation reserve allocation for integrated hydropower plant and energy storage systems via the marginal substitution [J]. Electronics, 2025, 14(8): 1582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14081582.

[21] Liu S, Wang D, Luo J, Yan J, Li Y, Li X, Li C. Research on reserve capacity optimization of hydro–wind–solar power systems based on two-stage optimization [J]. Energies, 2026, 19(10): 2324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102324.

[22] Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory [J]. Neural Computation, 1997, 9(8): 1735–1780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.

[23] Tang H, Kang F, Li X, Sun Y. Short-term photovoltaic power prediction model based on feature construction and improved trans-former [J]. Energy, 2025, 320: 135213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135213.

[24] Zhang Y, Yang Q. A survey on multi-task learning [J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2022, 34(12): 5586-5609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3070203.

[25] Wang X, Han L, Wang C, Yu H, Yu X. A time-scale adaptive dispatching strategy considering the matching of time characteristics and dispatching periods of the integrated energy system [J]. Energy, 2023, 267: 126584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126584.

[26] Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. Attention is all you need [C]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017, 30: 5998–6008.

[27] Turk A, Wu Q, Zhang M, Oestergaard J. Day-ahead stochastic scheduling of integrated multi-energy system for flexibility synergy and uncertainty balancing [J]. Energy, 2020, 196: 117130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117130.

[28] Barbre Z, Li G. Enhanced wind energy forecasting using an extended long short-term memory model [J]. Algorithms, 2025, 18(4): 206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/a18040206.

[29] Li Y, Zhai S, Yi G, Pang S, Luo X. Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting based on ICEEMDAN-TCN-BiLSTM-MHA [J]. Symmetry, 2025, 17(10): 1599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17101599.

[30] Cai C, Tao Y, Zhu T, Deng Z. Short-term load forecasting based on deep learning bidirectional LSTM neural network [J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(17): 8129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178129.

Downloads

Published

01-10-2026

How to Cite

1.
Zhao W, Jiang Y, Xie Y, Guo P, Li L, Huang Z. Transformer-LSTM-Attention Deep LearningPrediction and Multi-Time-ScaleError-Compensation Optimization forHydro-Wind-PV-Storage Clean Energy Bases UsingCascade-Hydropower Reserve. EAI Endorsed Trans Energy Web [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 1 [cited 2026 Oct. 1];13. Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/ew/article/view/15097

Most read articles by the same author(s)