Empirical Study on Influencing Factors of Rural Environmental Behavior in Informatization
Keywords:information technology background, rural environmental behavior, influencing factors, rural environmental protection, sustainable development
INTRODUCTION: With the advent of the information technology era, rural areas face new environmental protection challenges and opportunities. The rapid development of information technology provides new possibilities for changes in rural ecological behavior. However, understanding the influencing factors of rural environmental behavior in the context of information technology remains an important research topic.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to reveal the influencing factors of rural environmental behavior in the context of information technology to help governments and policymakers develop effective environmental protection strategies. Specifically, the researchers will focus on the extent to which factors such as education level, ecological awareness, economic status, and social participation influence the environmental behavior of rural residents.
METHODS: A questionnaire survey was used in this study, and residents of a particular rural area were selected as the research subjects. A questionnaire containing questions on education level, environmental awareness, economic status, social participation, and environmental behavior was designed, and a large amount of data was collected through random sampling. Statistical analysis methods, such as regression and correlation analyses, were used to process and interpret the data.
RESULTS: The study's results showed that the education level significantly affected the environmental behavior of rural residents. Residents with higher levels of education were more inclined to take positive ecological protection actions such as waste separation and energy conservation. In addition, environmental awareness was also found to be closely related to environmental behavior, with residents with higher ecological awareness being more concerned about environmental protection and taking action accordingly. Economic status and social participation affected rural residents' environmental behavior to a certain extent but to a lesser extent than education level and ecological awareness.
CONCLUSION: Rural environmental behavior in the context of informatization is affected by a combination of factors. To promote rural ecological protection, the government should strengthen investment in education and improve rural residents' education level and environmental awareness. In addition, social organizations and public participation should also be supported to encourage rural residents to actively participate in environmental protection actions. These measures will help to promote a change in ecological behavior in rural areas and achieve the goal of sustainable development.
Alexis C., E., Henrik, O., Séverine, L., Mallory, S., Casey, C., Jan, S., Kristina, S., & Kenneth S., K. (2023). Shared genetic and environmental etiology between substance use disorders and suicidal behavior. Psychological Medicine, 78, 111–126.
Cagliero, R., Licciardo, F., & Legnini, M. (2021). The Evaluation Framework in the New CAP 2023-2027: A Reflection in the Light of Lessons Learned from Rural Development. Sustainability, 13(10), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105528
Donno, D., Hassani, S., Sofoini, T., Mellano, M. G., Riondato, I., Gamba, G., & Beccaro, G. L. (2021). Traditional Foods and Sustainable Rural Development: Exploiting the Case of the Comoros Tea as a Potential Source of Bioactive Compounds. Sustainability, 13, 27–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115815
Feng, E., Li, J., Zheng, G., Li, X., Wei, J., Wu, Z., Ma, X., & Yang, Z. (2022). Mechanically toughened conductive hydrogels with shape memory behavior toward self-healable, multi-environmental tolerant, and bidirectional sensors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 432, 134406-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.134406
Haldar, A., & Sethi, N. (2022). Environmental effects of Information and Communication Technology—Exploring the roles of renewable energy, innovation, trade, and financial development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111754
Ho, K. A., & Naseem, Z. (2023). Greener theatre, greener surgery – environmental sustainability in a rural surgical setup. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 93(5), 1134–1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.18369
Hofstede, H., Salemink, K., & Haartsen, T. (2022). The appreciation of rural areas and their contribution to young adults’ staying expectations. Journal of Rural Studies, 6(6), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.07.018
Hou, H., Tang, K., Liu, X., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology Optimized by Deep Learning to Rural Financial Development and Rural Governance. Journal of Global Information Management, 68, 78–96.
Jiang, A., Chen, C., Ao, Y., & Zhou, W. (2022). Measuring the Inclusive growth of rural areas in China. Applied Economics, 54(54), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1923640
Kaya, O., Klepacka, A. M., & Florkowski, W. J. (2021). The role of personal and environmental factors in rural homeowner decision to insulate: An example from Poland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 150(2), 777–789.
Latham-Green, T., Hazenberg, R., & Denny, S. (2023). Examining the role of driven-game shooting as a psycho-social resource for older adults in rural areas: A mixed-methods study. Aging and Society, 43(4), 902–928. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X2100091X
Li, F., He, K., Zhu, R., Zhang, J., & Gao, M. (2023). Rural low‐carbon energy development in the information age: Can internet access drive the farmer to participate in personal carbon trading schemes related to bioenergy? Sustainable Development, 23, 133–150.
Meschini, S., MartaToffolo, Mariana MachadoCaroselli. (2021). Educational briefings in touristic facilities promote sustainable tourist behavior and customer loyalty. Biological Conservation, 259(1), 78–99.
Pandey, A., & Asif, M. (2022). Assessment of energy and environmental sustainability in South Asia from the perspective of the Sustainable Development Goals. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 165, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112492
Tejero-Martin, D., Bai, M., Romero, A., Wellman, R., & Hussain, T. (2021). Steam Degradation of Ytterbium Disilicate Environmental Barrier Coatings: Effect of Composition, Microstructure and Temperature. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 32, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-022-01473-2
Wu, F., Misra, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2021). Challenges and New Opportunities on Barrier Performance of Biodegradable Polymers for Sustainable Packaging. Progress in Polymer Science, 117, 101395-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101395
Wu, H., Sun, X., & Wu, Y. (2021). A new quantitative measure of occupants’ overall satisfaction for indoor physical environmental quality. Indoor Air, 456, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12839
Yadav, S., Pandey, V. C., & Singh, L. (2021). Ecological restoration of fly ash-dumped area: Challenges and Opportunities. Land Degradation & Development, 45(35), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4064
Zhou, X., & Chen, W. (2021). The Impact of Informatization on the Relationship between the Tourism Industry and Regional Economic Development. Sustainability, 56(56), 78–95.
Dong Dianwen. (2022). Research the Current Situation and Countermeasures of Elderly Care for the Disabled in Rural Areas. Sustainable Development, 34, 45–60.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 license, which permits unlimited use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.