Research on multi-stage optimization planning of power internet of things based on seagull optimization algorithm

Peng Ye; Guanxian Liu; Shuo Yang; Shaotao Guo; Huan Wang; Yi Zhao; Mingli Zhang

doi:10.4108/ew.9093

Authors

Peng Ye Shenyang Institute of Engineering
Guanxian Liu Shenyang Institute of Engineering
Shuo Yang State Grid Fushun Electric Power Supply CO., LTD, Fushun, China
Shaotao Guo Shenyang Institute of Engineering
Huan Wang Shenyang Institute of Engineering
Yi Zhao Shenyang Institute of Engineering
Mingli Zhang State Grid Liaoning Electric Power CO., LTD, Shenyang, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/ew.9093

Keywords:

Power internet of things (PIoT), Integrated energy system (IES), Multi-stage, Seagull optimization algorithm (SOA), Planning method

Abstract

The Power Internet of Things (PIoT) is a significant technology for realizing the transformation of future energy systems, with the Integrated Energy System (IES) playing a crucial role in realizing the value of PIoT. Traditional IES planning methods typically focus on a single-stage planning approach and involve complex solution models, often resulting in inefficient equipment configurations and resource wastage. This study proposes a multi-stage IES planning method aimed at enhancing both energy efficiency and the economic performance of IES. The method models the IES based on electric, gas, and thermal buses, considering the coupling, storage, and conversion of multiple energy sources. A range of constraints, such as energy coupling, equipment capacity, and energy purchases, are considered. The planning cycle is divided into multiple stages, and an economic model is developed that accounts for both system investment and operating costs. Given the complexity of the multi-stage planning model, the Seagull Optimization Algorithm (SOA) is introduced to solve the problem. The SOA leverages its strong global and local search capabilities to determine the optimal capacity configuration at each stage. The comparison of the single-stage planning method by a calculation example proves the economic advantage of the multi-stage planning scheme and effectiveness of SOA.

Downloads

Mentions

News Mentions: 1

see details

References

[1] Y. Yang et al., "Bi-Level Multi-Objective Optimal Design of Integrated Energy System Under Low-Carbon Background," in IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 53401-53407, 2021,

[2] X. Kong, F. Sun, X. Huo, X. Li, Y. Shen, "Hierarchical optimal scheduling method of heat-electricity integrated energy system based on Power Internet of Things" Energy, vol. 210, 2020.

[3] Jiaxi Li, Dan Wang, Hongjie Jia, Yang Lei, Tianshuo Zhou, Ying Guo. "Mechanism analysis and unified calculation model of exergy flow distribution in regional integrated energy system" , vol.324.Applied Energy, 2022

[4] Yang Lei, Dan Wang, Hongjie Jia, Jiaxi Li, Jingcheng Chen, Jingru Li, Zhihong Yang. "Multi-stage stochastic planning of regional integrated energy system based on scenario tree path optimization under long-term multiple uncertainties" , vol.300.Applied Energy, 2021

[5] M. Zeng, Y. X. Liu, P. C. Zhou, Y. Q. Wang, and M. X. Hou, “Review and prospects of integrated energy system modeling and benefit evaluation,” Power Syst. Technol., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1697-1708, 2018.

[6] W. Gu, J. Wang, S. Lu, Z. Luo, and C. Y. Wu, “Optimal operation for integrated energy system considering thermal inertia of district heating network and buildings,” Applied Energy, vol. 199, pp. 234-246, Aug, 2017.

[7] Z. Liu, M. Zeng, H. Zhou and J. Gao, "A Planning Method of Regional Integrated Energy System Based on the Energy Hub Zoning Model," in IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 32161-32170, 2021.

[8] Zicong Yu, et al. " Optimal Configuration of Integrated Energy System Based on Energy-Conversion Interface," Applied Sciences，vol.9. Issue 7. 2019.

[9] C. Wang, et al. “A General Modeling Method for Optimal Dispatch of Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Microgrid,” Proceedings of the CSEE, vol.33 no.31 Nov.5, 2013

[10] H. Xiao, W. Pei, Z. Dong and L. Kong, "Bi-level planning for integrated energy systems incorporating demand response and energy storage under uncertain environments using novel metamodel," in CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 155-167, June 2018.

[11] G. Pan, W. Gu, Y. Lu, H. Qiu, S. Lu and S. Yao, "Optimal Planning for Electricity-Hydrogen Integrated Energy System Considering Power to Hydrogen and Heat and Seasonal Storage," in IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2662-2676, Oct. 2020.

[12] M. Zhang et al., "Optimal Design and Operation of Regional Multi-Energy Systems With High Renewable Penetration Considering Reliability Constraints," in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 205307-205315, 2020.

[13] Stefano Bracco, Gabriele Dentici and Silvia Siri, “Economic and environmental optimization model for the design and the operation of a combined heat and power distributed generation system in an urban area,” Energy, vol. 55, pp. 1014-1024, Jun. 2013

[14] B. Hong, J. Chen, W. Zhang, Z. Shi, J. Li and W. Miao, "Integrated energy system planning at modular regional-user level based on a two-layer bus structure," in CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 188-196, June 2018.

[15] W. Yang, W. Liu, C. Y. Chung and F. Wen, "Coordinated Planning Strategy for Integrated Energy Systems in a District Energy Sector," in IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1807-1819, July 2020.

[16] Du, G., et al. "A hybrid algorithm based optimization on modeling of grid independent biodiesel-based hybrid solar/wind systems." Renewable Energy, vol. 122, pp. 551-560, July 2018

[17] Jiao Wang, Yan Li, Gang Hu. "Hybrid seagull optimization algorithm and its engineering application integrating Yin–Yang Pair idea" , Engineering with Computers, 2021

[18] Fowlie M, Khaitan Y, Wolfram C, Wolfson D. “Solar microgrids and remote energy access: how weak incentives can undermine smart technology," Econom Energy Environ Policy vol 8 no 1, pp:59–84, 2019.

[19] G. Muñoz-Delgado, J. Contreras and J. M. Arroyo, "Multistage Generation and Network Expansion Planning in Distribution Systems Considering Uncertainty and Reliability," in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 3715-3728, Sept. 2016.

[20] T. Ding, Y. Hu and Z. Bie, "Multi-Stage Stochastic Programming With Nonanticipativity Constraints for Expansion of Combined Power and Natural Gas Systems," in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 317-328, Jan. 2018.

[21] C. Unsihuay-Vila, J. W. Marangon-Lima, A. C. Z. de Souza, I. J. Perez-Arriaga and P. P. Balestrassi, "A Model to Long-Term, Multiarea, Multistage, and Integrated Expansion Planning of Electricity and Natural Gas Systems," in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1154-1168, May 2010.

[22] Georgios Mavromatidis, Ivalin Petkov. "MANGO: A novel optimization model for the long-term, multi-stage planning of decentralized multi-energy systems," Applied Energy, vol 288, 2021

[23] Junxia Meng, Hanjun Deng, Minqi Yu, Shuai Yang, Huang Tan, Hongyin Chen. "A dayahead coordinated scheduling strategy for source storage and load considering demand response and lines loss" , Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 2024

[24] Yang Lei, et al. "Multi-stage stochastic planning of regional integrated energy system based on scenario tree path optimization under long-term multiple uncertainties," Applied Energy, vol 300,2021

[25] Xin Chen, Yuanlu Li, Yingchao Zhang, Xiaoling Ye, Xiong Xiong, Fanghong Zhang. "A Novel Hybrid Model Based on an Improved Seagull Optimization Algorithm for Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasting" , Processes, 2021.

[26] H. Jia, Z. Xing and W. Song, "A New Hybrid Seagull Optimization Algorithm for Feature Selection," in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 49614-49631, 2019.

[27] W. Huang, N. Zhang, J. Yang, Y. Wang and C. Kang, "Optimal Configuration Planning of Multi-Energy Systems Considering Distributed Renewable Energy," in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1452-1464, March 2019.