EDIL-SegRayDP: Training-Free Iris Segmentation via Segmentation-First Ray-Wise Dynamic Programming

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/eetinis.132.12656

Keywords:

Iris segmentation, Training-free, Dynamic programming, Occlusion modeling, Explainable biometrics

Abstract

Iris segmentation remains a critical yet challenging stage in biometric recognition, especially under off- axis capture, eyelid and eyelash occlusion, specular reflections, and illumination variations that violate the circular and unobstructed assumptions of classical pipelines. We present EDIL-SegRayDP, a training-free and explainable iris segmentation framework that departs from the conventional localization-first paradigm by treating annulus recovery as the primary optimization objective. Rather than committing early to a global center/radius hypothesis and refining it afterward, the proposed method performs segmentation-first boundary recovery with segmentation-aware center rescue and fail-safe outer-boundary control. Occlusion is handled explicitly through geometry-normalized masking and validity-aware annulus construction, while all key parameters are defined in scale-normalized form for cross-dataset portability. Experiments under a fixed-configuration protocol on IITD and CASIA-IrisV4-Interval show strong non-CNN performance with CPU-only inference, achieving an iris-mask mean Dice of 0.9106 on IITD and 0.9377 on CASIA-IrisV4- Interval, with corresponding pupil Dice of 0.9763 and 0.9755. Additional full-benchmark evaluations on CASIA-IrisV4-Lamp and CASIA-IrisV4-Thousand further confirm the portability of the proposed framework across more challenging and larger-scale subsets. Under the evaluation protocol adopted in this study, these results compare favorably with a recent training-free reference, supporting EDIL-SegRayDP as a competitive and interpretable training-free alternative for iris segmentation under non-ideal imaging conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Daugman J. How iris recognition works. IEEE Trans- actions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. 2004;14(1):21-30.

[2] Wildes RP. Iris recognition: an emerging biometric technology. Proceedings of the IEEE. 1997;85(9):1348- 63.

[3] Tan T, He Z, Sun Z. Efficient and robust segmentation of noisy iris images for non-cooperative iris recognition. Image and Vision Computing. 2010;28(2):223-30. 13 Trong-Thua Huynh et al.

[4] Ross A, Shah S. Segmenting Non-Ideal Irises Using Geodesic Active Contours. In: Biometrics Symposium: Special Session on Research at the Biometric Consortium Conference; 2006. p. 1-6.

[5] Wang C, Muhammad J, Wang Y, He Z, Sun Z. Towards Complete and Accurate Iris Segmentation Using Deep Multi-Task Attention Network for Non-Cooperative Iris Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. 2020;15:2944-59.

[6] Sharma G, Jaswal G, Nigam A, Ramachandra R. FISNET: A Learnable Fusion-Based Iris Segmentation Network Improving Robustness Across NIR and VIS Modalities. IEEE Access. 2025;13:101472-90.

[7] Daugman JG. High confidence visual recognition of persons by a test of statistical independence. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1993;15(11):1148-61.

[8] Masek L. Recognition of Human Iris Patterns for Biometric Identification [Master’s Thesis]. The University of Western Australia; 2003.

[9] Labati RD, Sansone C, Scotti F. Non-ideal iris segmentation using polar spline RANSAC and low-level energy minimization. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 2020;201:102787.

[10] Gautam G, Mukhopadhyay S. An adaptive localization of pupil degraded by eyelash occlusion and poor contrast. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2019;78(6):6655-77.

[11] Jan F, Min-Allah N, Agha S, Usman I, Khan I. A robust iris localization scheme for the iris recognition. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2021;80(3):4579- 605.

[12] Mathias GP, Gagan JH, Mallya BV, Kumar JRH. A unified approach for automated segmentation of pupil and iris in on-axis images. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update. 2022;2:100084.

[13] Sumi MR, Das P, Hossain A, Dey S, Schuckers S. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Iris Segmentation on Benchmarking Datasets. Sensors. 2024;24(21):7079.

[14] Xia C, Yan Y, Zhang R, Liu Y, Wang Q. A Light Spatial-Frequency Network for Robust Iris Segmentation and Localization. Applied Soft Computing. 2025;175:113009.

[15] Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI); 2015. p. 234-41.

[16] Lozej J, Meden B, Štruc V. End-to-End Iris Segmentation Using U-Net. In: IEEE International Work Conference on Bioinspired Intelligence (IWOBI); 2018. p. 1-8.

[17] Jha RR, Jaswal G, Gupta D, Saini S, Nigam A. PixISegNet: Pixel-level iris segmentation network using convolutional encoder–decoder with stacked hourglass bottleneck. IET Biometrics. 2020;9(1):11-24.

[18] Arsalan M, Kim DS, Lee MB, Owais M, Park KR. IrisDenseNet: Robust Iris Segmentation Using Densely Connected Fully Convolutional Networks in the Images by Visible Light and Near-Infrared Light Camera Sensors. Sensors. 2018;18(5):1501.

[19] Liu Z, Lin Y, Cao Y, Hu H, Wei Y, Zhang Z, et al. Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV); 2021. p. 10012-22.

[20] Cao H, Wang Y, Chen J, Jiang D, Zhang X, Tian Q, et al. Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentation. In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2022 Workshops; 2022. p. 205-18.

[21] Kirillov A, Mintun E, Ravi N, Mao H, Rolland C, Gustafson L, et al. Segment Anything. arXiv preprint arXiv:230402643. 2023. Available from: https:// arxiv.org/abs/2304.02643.

[22] Farmanifard P, Ross A. Iris-SAM: Iris Segmentation Using a Foundation Model. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence. Springer Nature Singapore; 2024. p. 394-409.

[23] Kumar JRH, Teotia K. Automatic Pupil Segmentation Based On Circular Active Discs. In: TENCON 2019 - 2019 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON); 2019. p. 1932-6.

[24] Sardar M, Banerjee S, Mitra S. Iris Segmentation Using Interactive Deep Learning. IEEE Access. 2020;8:219322- 30.

[25] Umer S, Dhara BC, Chanda B. Iris recognition using multiscale morphologic features. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2015;65:67-74.

[26] Al-Waisy AS, Qahwaji R, Ipson S, Al-Fahdawi S, Nagem TAM. A multi-biometric iris recognition system based on a deep learning approach. Pattern Analysis and Applications. 2018;21(3):783-802.

[27] Gangwar AK, Joshi A, Singh A, Alonso-Fernandez F, Bigun J. IrisSeg: A Fast and Robust Iris Segmentation Framework for Non-Ideal Iris Images. In: 2016 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB). Halmstad, Sweden; 2016. p. 1-8.

[28] Wu X, Zhao L. Study on Iris Segmentation Algorithm Based on Dense U-Net. IEEE Access. 2019;7:123959-68.

[29] Petrovska D, Mayoue A. Description and Documentation of the BioSecure Software Library. BioSecure; 2007

Downloads

Published

19-05-2026

How to Cite

1.
Huynh T-T, Huynh D-T, Duong C-S. EDIL-SegRayDP: Training-Free Iris Segmentation via Segmentation-First Ray-Wise Dynamic Programming. EAI Endorsed Trans Ind Net Intel Syst [Internet]. 2026 May 19 [cited 2026 May 20];13(2). Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/inis/article/view/12656