Artificial intelligence-Enabled Lightweight Flood Segmentation Model with Polarization Fusion and Attention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetinis.133.12738Keywords:
Attention mechanisms, flood segmentation, sentinel-1, synthetic aperture radar (SAR), UNetAbstract
Rapid and reliable flood maps are essential for emergency response and disaster management. However, many deep learning models for flood segmentation are computationally demanding, limiting real-time use and deployment on modest hardware. This paper presents PFALNet, a reduced-parameter segmentation network that integrates dual-polarization synthetic aperture radar image backscatter and a polarization-ratio channel. The model employs concurrent spatial and channel squeeze-and-excitation attention to enhance multi-scale feature fusion for flood delineation. Experiments on a public Sentinel-1 flood-mapping benchmark show that PFALNet achieves strong performance on the Florence test region (F1 = 90.53%, IoU = 82.70%, κ = 88.80%) while remaining lightweight (0.31M parameters, 5.88 GFLOPs) and enabling real-time inference (6.23 ms per 256 × 256 tile, ∼ 160 tiles/s) on a single GPU. These results indicate that carefully designed lightweight synthetic aperture radar (SAR) segmentation models can deliver competitive performance with substantially reduced computational cost.
Downloads
References
[1] D. Bonafilia, B. Tellman, T. Anderson, and E. Issenberg, “Sen1Floods11: A georeferenced dataset to train and test deep learning flood algorithms for Sentinel-1,” in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. Workshops (CVPRW), Seattle, WA, Jun. 2020, pp. 210–211.
[2] B. Ghosh, S. Garg, M. Motagh, and S. Martinis, “Automatic flood detection from Sentinel-1 data using deep learning architectures,” in ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. V-3-2022, Nice, France, Jun. 2022, pp. 201–208.
[3] V. Katiyar, N. Tamkuan, and M. Nagai, “Near-real-time flood mapping using off-the-shelf models with SAR imagery and deep learning,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Geosci. 12 Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Lightweight Flood Segmentation Model with Polarization Fusion and Attention Remote Sens. Symp. (IGARSS), Brussels, Belgium, Jul. 2021, pp. 1234–1237.
[4] L. Giustarini, R. Hostache, P. Matgen, G. J.-P. Schumann, L. Pfister, and L. Hoffmann, “A change detection approach to flood mapping in urban areas using TerraSAR-X,” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 21, pp. 52–65, Apr. 2013.
[5] S. Martinis and C. Rieke, “Backscatter analysis using multi-temporal and multi-frequency SAR data in the context of flood mapping at river saale, germany,” Remote Sensing, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 7732–7752, Jun. 2015.
[6] O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” in Med. Image Comput. Comput.-Assist. Intervent. (MIC-CAI), ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9351. Munich, Germany: Springer, Oct. 2015, pp. 234–241.
[7] J. Zhao, Z. Xiong, and X. X. Zhu, “UrbanSARFloods: Sentinel-1 SLC-based benchmark dataset for urban and open-area flood mapping,” in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. Workshops (CVPRW), Seattle, WA, USA, Jun. 2024, pp. 419–429.
[8] B. Ghosh, S. Garg, M. Motagh, and S. Martinis, “Automatic flood detection from Sentinel-1 data using a nested UNet model and a NASA benchmark dataset,” PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science, vol. 92, pp. 1–18, Mar. 2024.
[9] A. G. Roy, N. Navab, and C. Wachinger, “Concurrent spatial and channel Squeeze & Excitation in fully con- volutional networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02579, Mar. 2018.
[10] X. Wu, Z. Zhang, S. Xiong, W. Zhang, J. Tang, Z. Li, B. An, and R. Li, “A near-real-time flood detection method based on deep learning and SAR images,” Remote Sensing, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 2046, Apr. 2023, published: 12 Apr. 2023.
[11] N. Mohamadiazar et al., “Integrating deep learning, satellite image processing, and hydraulic modeling for near real-time flood mapping,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 635, p. 131025, Aug. 2024.
[12] F. Pech-May, R. Aquino-Santos, O. Álvarez-Cárdenas, J. Lozoya-Arandia, and G. Rios-Toledo, “Segmentation and visualization of flooded areas through Sentinel-1 images and U-Net,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens., vol. 17, pp. 8996–9008, Apr. 2024.
[13] A. Jamali, S. K. Roy, L. H. Beni, B. Pradhan, J. Li, and P. Ghamisi, “Residual wave vision U-Net for flood mapping using dual polarization Sentinel-1 SAR imagery,” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 127, p. 103662, Mar. 2024.
[14] R. Yadav, A. Nascetti, and Y. Ban, “Attentive dual stream siamese U-Net for flood detection on multi-temporal Sentinel-1 data,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. (IGARSS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Jul. 2022, pp. 5222–5225.
[15] A. Paszke, A. Chaurasia, S. Kim, and E. Culurciello, “ENet: A deep neural network architecture for real-time semantic segmentation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02147, Jun. 2016.
[16] A. Chaurasia and E. Culurciello, “LinkNet: Exploiting encoder representations for efficient semantic segmentation,” in Proc. IEEE Vis. Commun. Image Process. (VCIP), St. Petersburg, FL, USA, Dec. 2017, pp. 1–4.
[17] A. Howard, M. Sandler, G. Chu, L.-C. Chen, B. Chen, M. Tan, W. Wang, Y. Zhu, R. Pang, V. Vasudevan, Q. V. Le, and H. Adam, “Searching for MobileNetV3,” in Proc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV), Seoul, Korea, Oct. 2019, pp. 1314–1324.
[18] O. Oktay, J. Schlemper, L. L. Folgoc, M. Lee, M. Heinrich, K. Misawa, K. Mori, S. McDonagh, N. Y. Hammerla, B. Kainz, B. Glocker, and D. Rueckert, “Attention U-Net: Learning where to look for the pancreas,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03999, Apr. 2018.
[19] Z. Wang, X. Wang, and G. Li, “An extremely lightweight U-Net with soft fusion for flood detection using multi-source satellite images,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. (IGARSS), Pasadena, CA, USA, Jul. 2023, pp. 6454–6457.
[20] T.-Y. Lin, P. Goyal, R. Girshick, K. He, and P. Dollár, “Focal loss for dense object detection,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV), Venice, Italy, Oct. 2017, pp. 2980–2988.
[21] M. Tan and Q. V. Le, “EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks,” in Proc. 36th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), vol. 97. Long Beach, CA, USA: PMLR, Jun. 2019, pp. 6105–6114. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/tan19a.html
[22] J. Karvonen, “U-net with ResNet-34 backbone for dual-polarized C-band baltic sea-ice SAR segmentation, ”Annals of Glaciology, vol. 65, p. e32, Nov. 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Premisha Premananthan, Brad D. E. McNiven, Muhammad Fahim, Quang Nhat Le, Hang Le
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 license, which permits unlimited use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.
