A Multi-objective optimization model for sustainable production planning in textile MSMEs

Pablo Flores-Siguenza; Jose Antonio Marmolejo-Saucedo; Rodrigo Guamán

doi:10.4108/eetinis.v10i3.3752

Authors

Pablo Flores-Siguenza University of Cuenca https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8038-2912
Jose Antonio Marmolejo-Saucedo Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Rodrigo Guamán University of Cuenca https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9577-0264

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/eetinis.v10i3.3752

Keywords:

Sustainable Production Planning, MSMEs, Textile Industry, Multi-objective Optimization

Abstract

Textile MSMEs are characterized by their high influence on the economy of the countries, both for their contribution to the gross domestic product as well as for the generation of employment, in recent years the complexity of their operations, instability and lack of balance between economic, environmental and social factors, axes of sustainable development, stand out. It is necessary to implement approaches such as sustainable manufacturing and production planning, which seeks the creation of products with minimal environmental impact, safe for workers, and economically robust. In this context, this study aims to develop a multi-objective optimization model that enhances sustainable production planning in textile MSMEs. The methodology is based on two phases, the first one focused on the acquisition of information and the second one dedicated to the mathematical formulation of the model, where three objective functions focused on economic, environmental and social factors are proposed. The model is validated with real data from a textile MSME in Ecuador and different production alternatives are generated by proposing the implementation and use of photovoltaic energy as well as a greater use of personal protective equipment. One of the relevant conclusions of the study is the contribution to the textile industry with a sustainable decision support tool, where different scenarios for production planning and their respective economic, environmental and social consequences are shown.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pablo Flores-Siguenza, University of Cuenca

Department of Applied Chemistry and Systems of Production, Faculty of Chemical Sciences

Jose Antonio Marmolejo-Saucedo, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Facultad de Ingenieria

Rodrigo Guamán, University of Cuenca

Department of Applied Chemistry and Systems of Production, Faculty of Chemical Sciences,

References

Jia F, Yin S, Chen L, et al. The circular economy in the textile and apparel industry: A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 2020; 259: 120728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120728

Gutierrez LAB, Escobar CR, Toledo MR, et al. Análisis de los factores de competitividad para la productividad sostenible de las PYMES en Trujillo (Perú). Rev Métod Cuantitativos Para Econ Empresa 2020; 29: 208–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.3513

Yamuca JLB, Bravo JAL, Carpio WTM, et al. Factores económicos y sociales asociados a la creación y evolución de las MIPYMES en el Ecuador: Economic and social factors associated with the creation and evolution of MSMEs in Ecuador. LATAM Rev Latinoam Cienc Soc Humanidades 2023; 4: 4327–4341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i1.569

Urco CC, Salinas JG, Castillo D. Aproximación del modelo CAGE para la internacionalización de los productos textiles del Ecuador. Estud Gest Rev Int Adm 2019; 9–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32719/25506641.2019.5.1

Acioli C, Scavarda A, Reis A. Applying Industry 4.0 technologies in the COVID–19 sustainable chains. Int J Product Perform Manag; ahead-of-print. Epub ahead of print 1 February 2021. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2020-0137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2020-0137

Luna-Altamirano KA, Sarmiento-Espinoza WH, Calle-Masache OR, et al. Modelo de sustentabilidad para la reactivación de las Mipymes textiles de la ciudad de Cuenca-Ecuador. Dominio Las Cienc 2021; 7: 325–337.

Malek J, Desai TN. A systematic literature review to map literature focus of sustainable manufacturing. J Clean Prod 2020; 256: 120345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120345

Özsevinç A, Alkan C. Polyurethane shell medicinal lavender release microcapsules for textile materials: An environmentally friendly preparation. Ind Crops Prod 2023; 192: 116131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.116131

Chan FTS, Li N, Chung SH, et al. Management of sustainable manufacturing systems-a review on mathematical problems. Int J Prod Res 2017; 55: 1210–1225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1229067

Valaei N, Rezaei S. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: An empirical investigation among ICT-SMEs. Manag Res Rev 2016; 39: 1663–1694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216

Flores-Sigüenza P, Marmolejo-Saucedo JA, Niembro-Garcia J, et al. A systematic literature review of quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management. Math Biosci Eng 2021; 18: 2206–2229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021111

Hahn GJ, Brandenburg M. A sustainable aggregate production planning model for the chemical process industry. Comput Oper Res 2018; 94: 154–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.12.011

Müller R, Loster M, Volk R, et al. CO2-based assessment for sustainable production planning in the metal processing industry. Procedia Manuf 2018; 21: 289–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.123

Yousefi S, Baqeri M, Tosarkani BM, et al. A decision support framework for sustainable production planning of paper recycling systems. Comput Ind Eng 2023; 183: 109500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109500

Hosseini Dehshiri SS, Hosseini Dehshiri SJ, Firoozabadi B. Evaluation of using solar energy in Iran’s textile industry towards cleaner production: Sustainable planning and feasibility analysis. J Clean Prod 2023; 421: 138447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138447

Chourasiya R, Pandey S, Kumar Malviya R. Developing a framework to analyse the effect of sustainable manufacturing adoption in Indian textile industries. Clean Logist Supply Chain 2022; 4: 100045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100045

Ozturk E, Koseoglu H, Karaboyaci M, et al. Sustainable textile production: cleaner production assessment/eco-efficiency analysis study in a textile mill. J Clean Prod 2016; 138: 248–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.071

Tomaney M. Chapter 22 - Sustainable Textile Production. In: Sinclair R (ed) Textiles and Fashion. Woodhead Publishing, pp. 547–560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84569-931-4.00022-2

Islam MdS, Ahmed S, Azady MdAR. 18 - Sustainable technologies for textile production. In: Mondal MdIH (ed) Fundamentals of Natural Fibres and Textiles. Woodhead Publishing, pp. 625–655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821483-1.00017-6

Yazdani MA, Khezri A, Benyoucef L. A Linear Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Process and Production Planning Generation in a Sustainable Reconfigurable Environment. IFAC-Pap 2021; 54: 689–695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.181

Ozturk E, Koseoglu H, Karaboyacı M, et al. Minimization of water and chemical use in a cotton/polyester fabric dyeing textile mill. J Clean Prod 2016; 130: 92–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.080

IESS. IESS Seguro General de Riesgos de Trabajo I Principal, https://sart.iess.gob.ec/DSGRT/portal/index.html (2022).

Baldeón M. Análisis estadístico de accidentalidad laboral del Ecuador y comparación con la accidentalidad laboral de Colombia del año 2013. bachelorThesis, Quito: USFQ, 2014, http://repositorio.usfq.edu.ec/handle/23000/3549 (2014, accessed 18 August 2023).

Tumpa TJ, Ali SM, Rahman MdH, et al. Barriers to green supply chain management: An emerging economy context. J Clean Prod 2019; 236: 117617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117617