Value Regeneration–Driven Eco-design for Smart Wearables
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetpht.11.11031Keywords:
Eco-design, Smart Wearable Devices, Regeneration Principle, Product-Service Systems, Digital TwinAbstract
The explosive growth of smart wearable devices has created a severe electronic-waste challenge. Existing eco-design research largely focuses on material circulation, with few studies—under a cross-disciplinary design lens—deeply integrating digital technologies and business models to achieve sustained “regeneration” of product value. Going beyond the traditional 4R framework, this study proposes a new eco-design paradigm for smart wearables that takes Regenerate as its core driving principle. The framework creatively integrates Product–Service Systems and Digital Twin technologies across the full design life cycle to realize data-driven value co-creation, extending the physical lifespan of the product while continuously enhancing its intangible digital value. Using a smartwatch as a case, we develop and evaluate three innovative design schemes. Results show that the Regenerate scheme—combining PSS and DT—reduces disassembly time by 73%, increases the reusable parts ratio to 78.5%, raises willingness to pay by 34.3%, and lowers global warming potential by 34.5% compared with the original design. This research provides a forward-looking theoretical framework and practical pathway for the sustainable development of smart wearables, and reveals the critical role of digital technologies in driving eco-design’s shift from “material circulation” to “value regeneration.”
Downloads
References
[1] Geissdoerfer M, Savaget P, Bocken NM, Hultink EJ. The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?. Journal of cleaner production. 2017 Feb 1;143:757-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
[2] Tukker A. Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy–a review. Journal of cleaner production. 2015 Jun 15;97:76-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049
[3] Bocken NM, De Pauw I, Bakker C, Van Der Grinten B. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of industrial and production engineering. 2016 Jul 3;33(5):308-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
[4] Pieroni MP, McAloone TC, Pigosso DC. Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches. Journal of cleaner production. 2019 Apr 1;215:198-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036
[5] Moreno M, De los Rios C, Rowe Z, Charnley F. A conceptual framework for circular design. Sustainability. 2016 Sep 13;8(9):937. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090937
[6] Parajuly K, Wenzel H. Potential for circular economy in household WEEE management. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017 May 10;151:272-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.045
[7] JIANG J. Application of Intelligent Labels and Tracking Technologies in the Plastic Circular Economy: Optimization of the Whole Link in Design and Recycling. Green Design Engineering. 2024 Oct 1;1(1):59-68.
[8] Li X, Zhang J, Chen H. Learning from Outcomes Shapes Design Innovation Strategies: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach. BIG. D. 2025 Jul 1;2(3):56-61.
[9] Logeswari MR, Kannan N. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON RIGHT TO REPAIR–FOCUS ON CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE. International Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2025 Jun 2:149-60. https://doi.org/10.64252/4t4c9w82
[10] Grieves M, Vickers J, Kahlen FJ, Flumerfelt S, Alves A. Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems. Springer. 2017:85-113.
[11] Tao F, Zhang H, Liu A, Nee AY. Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on industrial informatics. 2018 Oct 1;15(4):2405-15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2873186
[12] Yu W, Liu G, Zhu L, Yu W. Digital Twin: A Literature Review of Concepts, Technologies and Applications. IEEE Access. 2025 Oct 22. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3624583
[13] Sun X, Zhang F, Wang J, Yang Z, Huang Z, Xue R. Digital twin for smart manufacturing equipment: modeling and applications. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2025 Mar 31:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15468-0
[14] Porter ME, Heppelmann JE. How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard business review. 2014 Nov 1;92(11):64-88.
[15] Zheng P, Wang Z, Chen CH, Khoo LP. A survey of smart product-service systems: Key aspects, challenges and future perspectives. Advanced engineering informatics. 2019 Oct 1;42:100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100973
[16] Wang Z, Zheng P. A Systematic Framework for Smart Product-Service System Innovation in Human-Cyber-Physical System. InHuman-Centric Smart Manufacturing Towards Industry 5.0 2025 Apr 12 (pp. 125-142). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82170-7_6
[17] Singh M, Fuenmayor E, Hinchy EP, Qiao Y, Murray N, Devine D. Digital twin: Origin to future. Applied System Innovation. 2021 May 24;4(2):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4020036
[18] Boix Rodríguez N, Favi C. Disassembly and repairability of mechatronic products: insight for engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design. 2024 Feb 1;146(2):020906. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064075
[19] Fink L, Geldman D. The effects of consumer participation in product construction and design on willingness to pay: The case of software. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017 Oct 1;75:903-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.039
[20] Neubauer SC. Global warming potential is not an ecosystem property. Ecosystems. 2021 Dec;24(8):2079-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00631-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Haoran Wang, Guanghui Huang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.
