The Construction of Therapeutic Space in Emotional Wellness Apps: An Interaction Design Study Based on the Theory of the Production of Space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetpht.11.11050Keywords:
Spatial Narrative, Emotional Health Apps, Interaction Design, Healing SpaceAbstract
INTRODUCTION: In response to the global shortage of mental health resources, the design paradigm of emotional wellness apps is shifting from “functional tools” to “immersive spaces.” However, existing research lacks a systematic framework to analyze the therapeutic mechanisms of “spatiality” in such applications.
OBJECTIVES: Based on Henri Lefebvre’s theory of the production of space, this study employs an exploratory sequential mixed-methods approach to construct and preliminarily validate a model of digital therapeutic space in emotional wellness apps for empirical analysis.
METHODS: The study first conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 intensive users of three representative apps, “Chao Xi,” “MoFlow,” and “Xin Guang.” Grounded theory was used for three-level coding to extract core categories and construct a theoretical model. Subsequently, based on qualitative coding results, the Spatial Narrative Experience Assessment Scale was developed and administered to 286 users. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, multiple linear regression, and Bootstrap methods were used to test model pathways, controlling for common method bias.
RESULTS: The results show: (1) The therapeutic space of emotional wellness apps is a systematic model comprising three main categories (physical space, social space, and spiritual space) and nine subcategories. (2) Qualitative analysis revealed a carrier-rule-output spatial logic. (3) After controlling for usage duration and mental health baseline, physical space (β = 0.29, p < 0.001) and social space (β = 0.38, p < 0.001) significantly positively influenced spiritual space experience. Bootstrap tests indicated no significant difference in their effects (95% CI [-0.03, 0.21]), supporting a “Dual Engine Drive” mechanism. Common method bias was acceptable (first-factor explanation rate: 32.7%).
CONCLUSION: This study validates the operationalization of the theory of the production of space in interaction design research, providing a systematic theoretical model and empirical basis for the construction and evaluation of “digital therapeutic space.” The derived “carrier-rule-output” framework offers actionable insights for the design of emotionally resonant digital environments.
Downloads
References
[1] World Health Organization. World mental health report: transforming mental health for all. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[2] Monachelli R, Davis SW, Barnard A, Longmire M, Docherty JP, Oakley-Girvan I. Designing mHealth Apps to Incorporate Evidence-Based Techniques for Prolonging User Engagement. Interact J Med Res. 2024;13:e51974. doi:10.2196/51974.
[3] Vhaduri S, Simhadri SS. Understanding user concerns and choice of app architectures in designing Audio-based mHealth Apps. Smart Health. 2022;26:100341. doi:10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100341.
[4] Zheng K, Chen W, He H. Research on interface design of elderly-friendly medical APP under the perspective of scene fusion. Highlights Art Des. 2025; 11(2): 40-47. doi:10.54097/h6e26627.
[5] Yao Y, Pan X, Xiong Q, Li J, Wang Y. Research on the interaction design of psychological APPs for rural youth groups based on Gross’s theory. Packag Eng. 2024;45(22):510-520.
[6] Yang Q, Wang J, Zhang P. Research on multi-level task interaction design of health management terminals from the perspective of cognitive aging. Packag Eng. 2023; 44(22): 181-190.
[7] Yu R, Lyu G, Zhang Y. Spatial narrative in virtual reality media: field construction, plot purpose, and subject interaction. Study Pract. 2024;(12):132-140.
[8] Zhao Y, Ye X, Li J. The App Walk-through method: a new approach for research on user information behavior and interaction design in the digital intelligence era. J Info Res Manage. 2025;15(03):60-75.
[9] Lefebvre H. The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991.
[10] Dourish P, Harrison S. Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems//Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work; 1996 Nov 16-20; Boston, MA. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 1996. p. 67-76.
[11] Bachelard G. The poetics of space. Boston: Beacon Press; 1994.
[12] Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Löwe B. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4. Psychosomatics.2009;50(6):613-621. doi:10.1176/appi.psy. 50.6.613.
[13] Mallawaarachchi S, Cliff DP, Neilsen-Hewett C, White SLJ, Radesky J, Horwood S, et al. Effects of Persuasive App Design and Self-Regulation on Young Children’s Digital Disengagement. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2025;2025(1). doi:10.1155/hbe2/8187768.
[14] Li Q, Li Y, Zhang S, Zhou X, Pan Z. A theoretical framework for human-centered intelligent information services: a systematic review. Inf Process Manag. 2025;62(1):103891. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103891.
[15] Almutari NS, Alqahtani F, Orji R, Chan G. StepsBooster-S: A Culturally Tailored Step-Based Persuasive Application for Promoting Physical Activity. Int J Hum-Comput Interact. 2024;1-24. doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2331874.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Qi Zhang, Buyu Xu, Lin Zhu, Yichen Wu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.
