User-Centered Design of a Wearable Gait Analysis Tool for Knee Endoprosthesis Rehabilitation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetpht.11.11379Keywords:
User-centered design, Rehabilitation Tool for Patients with Knee Endoprostheses, IMU-Based wearable for Gait AnalysisAbstract
With more than 193,000 cases in Germany in 2019, total knee endoprostheses (knee-TEP) are among the 20 most common surgeries performed on hospitalized patients [1]. A standard method for assessing post-operative mobility is the manual measurement of range of motion using a goniometer. This method is subjective, dependent on the clinician’s experience, and provides only a snapshot of the patient’s condition. Existing sensor-based systems for gait analysis are primarily designed for clinical use and research contexts, and are generally not intended for independent application by patients at home. To complement these solutions, we developed a mobile, wearable sensor system and a corresponding app that enables self-administered gait analysis and mobility assessment for patients with knee-TEPs in both clinical and home settings. This paper presents key insights gained from a user-centered design process employing participatory methods, highlighting implications for the development of patient centered rehabilitation technologies.
Downloads
References
[1] Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWIG). Mindestmengen an Knie-TEP: Höhere Fallzahlen bringen mehr Behandlungsqualität [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 08]. Available from: https://www.iqwig.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/pressemitteilungen-detailseite_62336.html
[2] Evans, J.T., Walker, R.W., Evans, J.P., Blom, A.W., Sayers, A., Whitehouse, M.R.: How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. The Lancet, 393, 655–663 (2019).
[3] Palmer S. Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) [Internet]. Medscape; 2020 [cited 2022 Jul 08]. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1250275-overview
[4] Bretschneider, M., Kolasińska, A., Šomvárska, L., Klásek, J., Mareš, J., Schwarz, P. Evaluation of the Impact of Mobile Health App Vitadio in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2025;27:e68648. https://doi.org/10.2196/68648
[5] Heidel, A., Hagist, C. Potential Benefits and Risks Resulting from the Introduction of Health Apps and Wearables Into the German Statutory Health Care System: Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(9):e16444. https://doi.org/10.2196/16444
[6] DIN. DIN EN ISO 62366-1:2021-08 – Medizinprodukte – Teil 1: Anwendung der Gebrauchstauglichkeit auf Medizinprodukte (ISO 62366-1:2015 + Amd 1:2020). Berlin: Beuth Verlag; 2021.
[7] Martin JL, Clark DJ, Morgan SP, Crowe JA, Murphy E. A user-centered approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: a case study from an industry perspective. Applied Ergonomics. 2012; 43(1):184-190
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Katharina Lorenz, Hannah Friedrike Fischer, Daniela Wittmann

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.
