Immediate Gratification and Delay Discounting: Reshaping Fragmented Physical Activity Habits in Sedentary Populations Using Micro-Instant Rewards
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetpht.11.14258Keywords:
Sedentary behavior, delay discounting, behavioral economics, digital nudge, behavioral design, creative economy, micro-incentives, mHealth, randomized crossover trialAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Prolonged, uninterrupted occupational sitting is a major risk factor for adverse cardiometabolic outcomes. Although many office workers recognize these risks, an intention–behavior gap remains. Delay discounting—the tendency to devalue delayed outcomes relative to immediate costs or benefits—may contribute to this gap, but it is not the only plausible behavioral mechanism. Conventional workplace incentives often defer reinforcement and may offer low perceived attainability.
OBJECTIVES: We compared two mHealth reward packages for increasing hourly exercise snacks among sedentary office workers.
METHODS: In a randomized AB/BA crossover trial, 120 information-technology professionals completed two 8-week conditions separated by a 4-week washout; 115 were included in the per-protocol linear mixed-effects model. A smart seat cushion triggered a fixed prompt after 60 minutes of uninterrupted sitting. Condition A used delayed deterministic points with a high redemption threshold; Condition B delivered immediate randomized micro-rewards.
RESULTS: At Week 8, mean break frequency was 4.89 versus 3.60 breaks/day (difference 1.29, 95% CI 0.82–1.75; p<0.001). The adjusted condition coefficient was 0.89 (95% CI 0.75–1.03; p<0.001). Sedentary time was 0.30 h/day lower (p=0.005), whereas the MVPA difference did not survive FDR correction (adjusted p=0.049). The condition × log(k) interaction was −0.28 (95% CI −0.52 to −0.04; p=0.022). The condition × period interaction (differential carryover) was not statistically significant (β=0.56, 95% CI −0.09 to 1.21; p=0.092), and the period-1-only contrast remained significant (β=0.61, 95% CI 0.25–0.97; p=0.001), arguing against material carryover.
CONCLUSION: Immediate randomized micro-rewards were associated with more sedentary interruptions in the bundled comparison. Because the two conditions differed in several design features, the findings should be interpreted as comparative evidence for the two reward packages and as preliminary evidence regarding short-term behavior change.
Downloads
References
[1] Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451-1462. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.
[2] Strain T, Flaxman S, Guthold R, et al. National, regional, and global trends in insufficient physical activity among adults from 2000 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 507 population-based surveys with 5.7 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12(8):e1232-e1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00150-5.
[3] Rouyard T, Vach W, Andersen MK, et al. Effects of workplace interventions on sedentary behaviour and physical activity outcomes: an umbrella review with meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2025;10(3):e198-e213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00038-6.
[4] Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, et al. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(2):123-132. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-1651.
[5] Patterson R, McNamara E, Tainio M, et al. Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(9):811-829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1.
[6] Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, Bouchard C. Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(5):998-1005. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181930355.
[7] Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, Dunstan DW. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996-2011. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.004.
[8] Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, et al. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012;55(11):2895-2905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2677-z.
[9] Polspoel M, Mullie P, Reilly T, et al. Comparison of physical activity and sedentary behavior between telework and office work in a working population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):1089.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22948-1.
[10] Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. Bridging the intention-behaviour gap: planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychol Health. 2005;20(2):143-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440512331317670
[11] Rhodes RE, de Bruijn GJ. How big is the physical activity intention-behaviour gap? A meta-analysis using the action control framework. Br J Health Psychol. 2013;18(2):296-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12032.
[12] O'Donoghue T, Rabin M. Doing it now or later. Am Econ Rev. 1999;89(1):103-124. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.1.103.
[13] Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit. 2002;40(2):351-401.https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161311.
[14] Rung JM, Madden GJ. Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 2018;110(2):148-167. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/xge0000462.
[15] Wang Y, Hu Z, Ding Y, et al. Delay discounting and BMI in hypertensives: serial mediations of self-efficacy, physical activity and sedentary behavior. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024;17:4319-4334. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S481425.
[16] An YD, Ma GX, Cai XK, et al. Examining the association between delay discounting, delay aversion and physical activity in Chinese adults with type-2 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2024;15(4):675-685.https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v15.i4.675.
[17] Brown JM and Stein JS. Putting prospection into practice: Methodological considerations in the use of episodic future thinking to reduce delay discounting and maladaptive health behaviors. Front. Public Health 10:1020171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1020171.
[18] Miriam Alice Vitzthum, Karsten Krüger, Christopher Weyh.The impact of financial incentives on physical activity for employees in the context of workplace health promotion: a systematic review. Journal of Occupational Health. Volume 66, Issue 1, January-December 2024, uiae048.https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae048
[19] Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 2008.
[20] Landais LL, Damman OC, Schoonmade LJ, Timmermans DRM, Verhagen EALM, Jelsma JGM. Choice architecture interventions to change physical activity and sedentary behavior: a systematic review of effects on intention, behavior and health outcomes during and after intervention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-00942-7. [21] Fanaroff, Alexander C., et al. Effect of Gamification, Financial Incentives, or Both to Increase Physical Activity Among Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Events: The BE ACTIVE Randomized Controlled Trial.Circulation, vol. 149, no. 21. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069531.
[22] de Buisonjé DR, Frielink N, Atsma DE, et al. Health promotion through monetary incentives: evaluating the impact of different reinforcement schedules on engagement levels with a mHealth app. Electronics. 2021;10(23):2935. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10232935.
[23] Larche CJ, Musielak N, Dixon MJ. Rare loot box rewards trigger larger arousal and reward responses, and greater urge to open more loot boxes. J Gambl Stud. 2021;37(1):141-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09913-5.
[24] Zendle D, Cairns P. Video game loot boxes are linked to problem gambling: results of a large-scale survey. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206767. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206767.
[25] Mitchell MS, Orstad SL, Biswas A, et al.Financial incentives for physical activity in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.British Journal of Sports Medicine 2020;54:1259-1268.https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-100633.
[26] Nishi SK, Kavanagh ME, Ramboanga K, Ayoub-Charette S, Modol S, Dias GM, et al. Effect of digital health applications with or without gamification on physical activity and cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;76:102798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102798.
[27] Wang M, Zhou Y, Chen Y, et al. Effectiveness of gamification interventions to improve physical activity and sedentary behavior in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Serious Games. 2025;13:e68151. https://doi.org/10.2196/68151.
[28] Ye S, Ding Y, Hu B, et al. Advances in exercise snacks for interrupting sedentary behavior and promoting physical activity: a narrative review. Front Public Health. 2026;14:1810516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1810516.
[29] Fang Y, Li H, Dong P, Wan F. Micro-exercise breaks every hour: a feasible strategy to improve metabolic health in sedentary office workers. BMC Public Health. 2026;26:763. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26484-4.
[30] Saunders TJ, Atkinson HF, Burr J, et al. The acute metabolic and vascular impact of interrupting prolonged sitting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2018;48(10):2347-2366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0963-8.
[31] Dempsey PC, Larsen RN, Sethi P, et al. Benefits for type 2 diabetes of interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light walking or simple resistance activities. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(6):964-972. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-2336.
[32] Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47(2):263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.
[33] Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain. 1992;5(4):297-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574.
[34] de Buisonjé DR, Reijnders T, Cohen Rodrigues TR, Prabhakaran S, Kowatsch T, Lipman SA, et al. Investigating rewards and deposit contract financial incentives for physical activity behavior change using a smartphone app: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(10):e38339. https://doi.org/10.2196/38339.
[35] Thorp AA, Kingwell BA, Owen N, Dunstan DW. Breaking up workplace sitting time with intermittent standing bouts improves fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort in overweight/obese office workers. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(11):765-771. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2014-102348.
[36] Nahum-Shani I, Smith SN, Spring BJ, et al. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(6):446-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8.
[37] Hsu TC, Whelan P, Gandrup J, Armitage CJ, Cordingley L, McBeth J. Personalized interventions for behaviour change: a scoping review of just-in-time adaptive interventions. Br J Health Psychol. 2025;30(1):e12766. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12766.
[38] Chandrasekaran B, Rao CR. Mobile interventions for reducing sedentary behavior and promoting physical activity among office workers: bibliometric study. Health Educ Behav. 2026;53(2):190-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981251361958.
[39] Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, et al. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-78.
[40] Ntoumanis N, Moller AC. Self-determination theory informed research for promoting physical activity: contributions, debates, and future directions. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2025;80:102879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102879.
[41] Lev-Arey D, Gutman T, Levental O. Empowering movement: enhancing young adults' physical activity through self-determination theory and acceptance and commitment therapy-based intervention. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024;14(2):130. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020130.
[42] Wang H, Chen J, Wang T, Li G. Research on Social Design Theories and Methods Based on Unconscious Behavior Data. Big. D. 2024;1(1):85-93. https://doi.org/10.64504/big.d.v1i1.23
[43] HUANG J. Health food consumption strategies: a focus on research in consumer psychology and behavioral economics. Green Design Engineering. 2024 Oct 1;1(1):69-77.
[44] Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, Elbourne D. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4378. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4378
[45] Senn S. Cross-over trials in clinical research. 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2002.https://doi.org/10.1002/0470854596.
[46] Ryan CG, Grant PM, Tigbe WW, Granat MH. The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(9):779-784. https://doi.org/doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.027276.
[47] Brooke J. SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland IL, editors. Usability evaluation in industry. London: Taylor & Francis; 1996. p. 189-194. [48] Kirby KN, Petry NM, Bickel WK. Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls or currently-using alcoholics. Addiction. 1999;94(1):78-87. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.941787.x.
[49] Dziak JJ, Dierker LC, Abar B. The interpretation of statistical power after the data have been gathered. Curr Psychol. 2020;39(3):870-877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0018-1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Juan Jin, Wu Wei, Gao Yanmei
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.
