Quantum Communication-Assisted Synchronization Framework for Distributed 3D Power Grid Models Across Multi-Regional Control Centers

Authors

  • Youhui Chen State Grid Liaoning Electric Power Company Limited Economic Research Institute
  • Zhonghua Lv State Grid Liaoning Electric Power Company Limited Economic Research Institute
  • Ruixue Hu State Grid Liaoning Electric Power Company Limited Economic Research Institute
  • Xinying Zhao State Grid Liaoning Electric Power Company Limited Economic Research Institute
  • Dongxue Li State Grid Liaoning Electric Power Company Limited Economic Research Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.12031

Keywords:

Quantum communication, Power grid, Digital twin, Quantum entanglement, Distributed energy resources

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The synchronization of three-dimensional digital twin models across geographically distributed power grid control centers represents a critical challenge in modern power system operations. Traditional synchronization methods including Network Time Protocol (NTP) and Precision Time Protocol (PTP) achieve only millisecond-level accuracy, which proves fundamentally insufficient for monitoring and responding to critical power grid transients that occur on sub-millisecond timescales. The proliferation of renewable energy sources and distributed generation resources further intensifies synchronization requirements. OBJECTIVES: This research develops a comprehensive quantum communication-assisted synchronization framework designed to achieve unprecedented temporal accuracy for distributed 3D power grid models spanning multi-regional control centers while maintaining compatibility with existing infrastructure. METHODS: A hierarchical quantum-classical hybrid architecture is proposed that strategically utilizes quantum entanglement channels for time-critical synchronization signals and classical communication channels for bulk data transmission. An adaptive fault-tolerance mechanism dynamically adjusts quantum error correction strategies based on real-time quantum channel quality assessments, with graceful degradation to classical protocols when necessary. RESULTS: Extensive simulations utilizing 128 IEEE 118-bus system models demonstrate sub-10 nanosecond synchronization precision—representing 10,000-fold improvement over NTP—with end-to-end latencies maintained below 10 microseconds. The framework exhibits robust performance with synchronization success rates exceeding 90% under 15% node failure conditions and demonstrates logarithmic O(log M) time complexity compared to O(M²) scaling for classical consensus protocols. CONCLUSION: The quantum communication-assisted framework delivers superior accuracy, scalability, and fault tolerance compared to classical synchronization protocols, establishing viability for next-generation smart grids with extensive distributed energy resources.

References

[1] O. Krishan, S. Suhag, An updated review of energy storage systems: Classification and applications in distributed generation power systems incorporating renewable energy resources, International Journal of Energy Research 43(12) (2019) 6171-6210.

[2] A. Estebsari, P.R. Mazzarino, L. Bottaccioli, E. Patti, IoT-enabled real-time management of smart grids with demand response aggregators, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 58(1) (2021) 102-112.

[3] A.B. Birchfield, T.J. Overbye, A review on providing realistic electric grid simulations for academia and industry, Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports 10(3) (2023) 154-161.

[4] M.A. SIDDIQUI, M. UMER, High-power inverter for modern electric grids based on large-scale renewable sources, (2024).

[5] A. Mohammed, O. Saif, M. Abo-Adma, A. Fahmy, R. Elazab, Strategies and sustainability in fast charging station deployment for electric vehicles, Scientific reports 14(1) (2024) 283.

[6] J.D. Follum, R. Hovsapian, N.M. Stenvig, Y. Agalgaonkar, K. Chatterjee, K. Mahapatra, A. Riepnieks, A.J. Wilson, S. Chanda, S. Granda, Advanced Measurements for Resilient Integration of Inverter-Based Resources: PROGRESS MATRIX Year-1 Report, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States), 2023.

[7] Y. Liu, B. Sun, Y. Wu, Y. Zhang, J. Yang, W. Wang, N.L. Thotakura, Q. Liu, Y. Liu, Time Synchronization Techniques in the Modern Smart Grid: A Comprehensive Survey, Energies 18(5) (2025) 1163.

[8] D.L. Mills, Internet time synchronization: the network time protocol, IEEE Transactions on communications 39(10) (2002) 1482-1493.

[9] T. Homer-Dixon, The upside of down: Catastrophe, creativity and the renewal of civilization, Vintage Canada2010.

[10] R.I. Hamilton, P.N. Papadopoulos, W. Bukhsh, K. Bell, Identification of important locational, physical and economic dimensions in power system transient stability margin estimation, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 13(2) (2022) 1135-1146.

[11] P. Fubin, Y. Yubo, G. Lei, S. Liangliang, The accuracy of IEEE 1588 time synchronization protocol and its improvement, 2015 12th IEEE International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI), IEEE, 2015, pp. 280-284.

[12] P. Chen, Z. Yang, Understanding PTP performance in today’s wi-fi networks, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 31(6) (2023) 3037-3050.

[13] D.D. Chowdhury, Packet Timing: Precision Time Protocol, NextGen Network Synchronization, Springer2021, pp. 117-150.

[14] B. Fan, C. Zhang, J. Chi, Y. Liang, X. Bao, Y. Cong, B. Yu, X. Li, G.-Y. Li, The molecular mechanism of retina light injury focusing on damage from short wavelength light, Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity 2022(1) (2022) 8482149.

[15] A. Gopalan, K.K. Arjunsingh, M. Ramya, J. Thangaraj, M. Venkatanaresh, K. Rajendran, O.K. Omran, M.A. Hossain, High performance efficiency of optical networking infrastructure characteristics with maximum speed of commercial fiber optic line cables employment, Journal of Optical Communications 45(s1) (2025) s2679-s2688.

[16] G. Martínez, J.A. Hernández, P. Reviriego, P. Reinheimer, Round trip time (rtt) delay in the internet: Analysis and trends, IEEE Network 38(2) (2023) 280-285.

[17] A. Althoubi, R. Alshahrani, H. Peyravi, Delay analysis in iot sensor networks, Sensors 21(11) (2021) 3876.

[18] L. Mastromauro, D.S. Andrade, M.O. Ozmen, M. Kinsy, Survey of Attacks and Defenses on Consensus Algorithms for Data Replication in Distributed Systems, IEEE Access (2025).

[19] Y. Xiao, N. Zhang, W. Lou, Y.T. Hou, A survey of distributed consensus protocols for blockchain networks, IEEE communications surveys & tutorials 22(2) (2020) 1432-1465.

[20] M. Salimitari, M. Chatterjee, Y.P. Fallah, A survey on consensus methods in blockchain for resource-constrained IoT networks, Internet of Things 11 (2020) 100212.

Downloads

Published

16-03-2026

How to Cite

1.
Chen Y, Lv Z, Hu R, Zhao X, Li D. Quantum Communication-Assisted Synchronization Framework for Distributed 3D Power Grid Models Across Multi-Regional Control Centers. EAI Endorsed Scal Inf Syst [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 16 [cited 2026 Mar. 18];12(8). Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/sis/article/view/12031