Data Security and Privacy Protection in Distributed Digital Economy: Economic Impacts and Governance Mechanisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.12557Keywords:
distributed, digital economy, data security, privacy protection, economic impact, governance mechanismAbstract
INTRODUCTION:The distributed digital economy, characterized by decentralization and cross-entity data flow, improves factor allocation efficiency but increasingly raises concerns over data security and privacy abuse.
OBJECTIVES: Unlike the conventional digital economy, which often centers on centralized platforms (e.g., e-commerce, cloud computing), the distributed digital economy in this paper specifically refers to an economic system where data—as a production factor—is stored, computed, and circulated across multiple independent nodes without a central coordinating authority, relying on technologies such as blockchain, distributed ledger, edge computing, and peer-to-peer networks. Its core governance features include decentralized data control, consensus-based verification, and peer-to-peer economic activities.
METHODS: This paper studies data security and privacy protection in the distributed digital economy from two aspects: economic impact and governance mechanism. Based on panel data from 30 provinces in China from 2018 to 2023, this paper uses the entropy weight-TOPSIS method, a two-way fixed effects model, a mediation effect model, and a spatiotemporal heterogeneity model to empirically test the economic impact and transmission mechanism of data security and privacy protection on the distributed digital economy.
RESULTS: The empirical analysis results show that the level of data security and privacy protection significantly and positively promotes the development of the distributed digital economy, with each unit increase leading to a 0.412 unit increase in the development index. Blockchain smart contracts, privacy computing standards, and cross-border data flow rules play significant mediating roles, accounting for 93.7% of the total mediating effect. This positive economic effect exhibits significant spatiotemporal differences, increasing year by year, and is significantly higher in the eastern region than in the central and western regions.
CONCLUSION: Based on empirical analysis results, optimization paths are proposed from four levels: collaborative governance, technology empowerment, regional balance, and institutional improvement, in order to improve the level of data security and privacy protection in the distributed digital economy.
References
[1] Rolando B, Mulyono H. E-commerce as a catalyst for digital economy development: a study of marketing strategies and their impact. J Distrib Sci. 2025;23(4):61-79.
[2] Ye M, Fang X, Du B, Yuen PC, Tao D. Heterogeneous federated learning: State-of-the-art and research challenges. ACM Comput Surv. 2023;56(3):1-44.
[3] Pineda M, Jabba D, Nieto-Bernal W. Blockchain architectures for the digital economy: trends and opportunities. Sustainability. 2024;16(1):442-452.
[4] Qizam I, Berakon I, Ali H. The role of halal value chain, Sharia financial inclusion, and digital economy in socio-economic transformation: a study of Islamic boarding schools in Indonesia. J Islam Mark. 2025;16(3):810-840.
[5] Juneja A, Goswami SS, Mondal S. Cyber security and digital economy: opportunities, growth and challenges. J Technol Innov Energy. 2024;3(2):1-22.
[6] Wilson A, Kask R, Ming LW. Exploring circular digital economy strategies for sustainable environmental, economic, and educational technology. Int Trans Educ Technol. 2024;2(2):129-139.
[7] Alhitmi HK, Mardiah A, Al-Sulaiti KI, Abbas J. Data security and privacy concerns of AI-driven marketing in the context of economics and business field: an exploration into possible solutions. Cogent Bus Manag. 2024;11(1):2393743-2393752.
[8] Pina E, Ramos J, Jorge H, Váz P, Silva J, Wanzeller C, Martins P. Data privacy and ethical considerations in database management. J Cybersecurity Priv. 2024;4(3):494-517.
[9] Williams J, Prawiyogi AG, Rodriguez M, Kovac I. Enhancing circular economy with digital technologies: A pls-sem approach. Int Trans Educ Technol. 2024;2(2):140-151.
[10] Pana K, Mitan W, Lamawitak PL. The Influence of Digital Economy Development on the Income of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in East Alok District. Neo J Econ Soc Humanit. 2024;3(2):145-159.
[11] Nepal R, Liu Y, Dong K, Jamasb T. Green financing, energy transformation, and the moderating effect of digital economy in developing countries. Environ Resour Econ. 2024;87(12):3357-3386.
[12] Beltrán E, Pérez M, Sánchez P, Bernal S, Bovet G, Pérez M, Pérez GM, Celdrán AH. Decentralized federated learning: Fundamentals, state of the art, frameworks, trends, and challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor. 2023;25(4):2983-3013.
[13] Voulgaridis K, Lagkas T, Angelopoulos CM, Boulogeorgos AAA, Argyriou V, Sarigiannidis P. Digital product passports as enablers of digital circular economy: a framework based on technological perspective. Telecommun Syst. 2024;85(4):699-715.
[14] Judijanto L, Hendriana TI, Muhammad AF. Strategic human capital planning in the asian digital economy: aligning workforce development with business objectives. Int J Financ Econ. 2025;1(8):344-360.
[15] Kirienko M, Sollini M, Ninatti G, Loiacono D, Giacomello E, Gozzi N, Amigoni F, Mainardi L, Lanzi PL, Chiti A. Distributed learning: a reliable privacy-preserving strategy to change multicenter collaborations using AI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(12):3791-3804.
[16] Iman N. The fight for our personal data: analyzing the economics of data and privacy on digital platforms. Int J Law Manag. 2024;66(6):774-791.
[17] Ma C, Li J, Wei K, Liu B, Ding M, Yuan L, Han Z, Poor HV. Trusted ai in multiagent systems: An overview of privacy and security for distributed learning. Proc IEEE. 2023;111(9):1097-1132.
[18] Yang X, Xu Y, Razzaq A, Wu D, Cao J, Ran Q. Roadmap to achieving sustainable development: does digital economy matter in industrial green transformation?. Sustain Dev. 2024;32(3):2583-2599.
[19] Sravanthi GL, Mandava R. AI-enabled distributed cloud frameworks for big data analytics with privacy preservation. J Trans Syst Eng. 2025;3(3):449-470.
[20] Pimenta RGA, Marques SAL, Lopes ELAN, Canedo ED, Mendonça FLLD, Oliveira AR, García VLJ. Understanding data breach from a global perspective: Incident visualization and data protection law review. Data. 2024;9(2):27-35.
[21] Liu B, Blancaflor EB. Data security and privacy protection scheme based on EC-ELGamal in federal learning. SN Comput Sci. 2025;6(2):170-182.
[22] Eghmazi A, Ataei M, Landry RJ, Chevrette G. Enhancing IoT data security: Using the blockchain to boost data integrity and privacy. IoT. 2024;5(1):20-34.
[23] Akter S, Uddin MR, Sajib S, Lee WJT, Michael K, Hossain MA. Reconceptualizing cybersecurity awareness capability in the data-driven digital economy. Ann Oper Res. 2025;350(2):673-698.
[24] Pei J, Liu W, Li J, Wang L, Liu C. A review of federated learning methods in heterogeneous scenarios. IEEE Trans Consum Electron. 2024;70(3):5983-5999.
[25] Salako AO, Fabuyi JA, Aideyan NT, Selesi AO, Dapo-Oyewole DL, Olaniyi OO. Advancing information governance in AI-driven cloud ecosystem: Strategies for enhancing data security and meeting regulatory compliance. Asian J Res Comput Sci. 2024;17(12):66-88.
[26] Wen J, Zhang Z, Lan Y, Cui Z, Cai J, Zhang W. A survey on federated learning: challenges and applications. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. 2023;14(2):513-535.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cuilan Wang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.
