Self-evolutionary control architecture based on distributed brain-inspired decision making and privacy-preserving PID
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.12815Keywords:
Brain-inspired decision-making, PID control, Adaptive control, Distributed AI models, Differential privacy, Power data securityAbstract
Traditional PID control suffers from limited parameter adaptability in complex dynamic systems and poor robustness against nonlinearities and uncertain disturbances. Meanwhile, in distributed power control scenarios, the risk of leakage regarding multi-node sensor data and AI model parameters hinders the practical implementation of brain-inspired intelligent control. Therefore, this paper proposes a privacy-preserving, distributed, brain-inspired DQN-PID self-evolving control architecture; it establishes an integrated operational logic for perception and regulation, which can enable dynamic cognition of control objectives and the prioritization of decision-making. A PID parameter self-evolution mechanism is designed, which can enable online learning and optimization of parameters through brain-like synaptic plasticity simulation. A multi-level feedback loop is constructed. Furthermore, a federated learning training framework and parameter differential privacy protection strategy for the distributed brain-inspired DQN model are designed. While achieving "data remains stationary while the model moves," lightweight encryption and privacy perturbation mechanisms ensure secure cross-node information interaction, which can achieve the dual goals of optimizing control performance and ensure the security of distributed AI model data. A distributed simulation platform based on Matlab/Simulink is built, and a distributed nonlinear coupled system and a distributed industrial temperature control object are selected for verification. The engineering practicality and data security protection capabilities of the architecture are verified through distributed hardware-in-the-loop experiments. Experimental results show that the proposed architecture outperforms the comparative algorithms in dynamic response speed, steady-state accuracy, and anti-interference capability. Compared to traditional PID, the rise time is reduced by 35.6%-42.5% and the settling time by 36.7%-42.1%. Compared to fuzzy PID, the rise time is reduced by 23.7%-28.1% and the settling time by 26.9%-30.4%. The convergence time for parameter self-evolution is shortened by 37.5% relative to the original brain-inspired PID architecture, and the steady-state error is reduced by more than 45%. Following the implementation of privacy protection strategies, the loss in control performance for the distributed model is less than 5%, while the risk of raw data leakage is reduced by over 90%. This approach achieves a balance among control performance, computational overhead, and data security in industrial real-time control scenarios, which can offer a new solution for the secure, high-precision adaptive control of complex power systems.
References
[1] Soori M, Dastres R, Arezoo B, Jough FK. Intelligent robotic systems in Industry 4.0: A review. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology. 2024, 4(3):2024007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51393/j.jamst.2024007
[2] Shahouni R, Bahraini M, Abrofarakh M, Abbasi M. Adaptive tuning of fractional order PID controllers for nonlinear processes using hybrid PSO DQN reinforcement learning. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):38545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22509-x
[3] Wang G, Bao H, Liu Q, Zhou T, Wu S, Huang T, Yu Z, Lu C, Gong Y, Zhang Z, He S. Brain-inspired artificial intelligence research: A review. Science China Technological Sciences. 2024;67(8):2282-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-024-2732-9
[4] Dixon ML, Dweck CS. The amygdala and the prefrontal cortex: The co-construction of intelligent decision-making. Psychological Review. 2022 Nov;129(6):1414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000339
[5] Pavon W. Metaheuristic-Based PID controller design with MOOD decision support applied to benchmark industrial systems. Electronics. 2025; 14(18):3630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14183630
[6] Yuan X, Zhang J, Li K, Cai Z, Yao L, Chen J, Wang E, Hou Q, Chen J, Jiang PT, Li B. Se-gui: Enhancing visual grounding for gui agents via self-evolutionary reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2026; 38:127658-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52202/085713-4251
[7] Shen L, Wang C, Lyu Y, Yue Y, Huang J, Cai Z. Self-Evolutionary Reinforced Knowledge Distillation for Multi-Modal Tool-Use Agents. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V. 2. 2026; pp. 4195-4206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3770855.3817780
[8] Hou H, Zhang J, Zhang M, Ye X. BiFDR: Brain-Inspired Federated Diffusion Transformer with reinforcement for privacy-preserving molecular generation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2025 Sep 13:104910. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104910
[9] Jiang K. A Neural Network Training Method Based on Distributed PID Control. Symmetry. 2025;17(7):1129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17071129
[10] Daw ND, Niv Y, Dayan P. Uncertainty-based competition between prefrontal and dorsolateral striatal systems for behavioral control. Nature neuroscience. 2005;8(12):1704-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1560
[11] Yu Y, Han F, Wang Q. Exploring phase–amplitude coupling from primary motor cortex-basal ganglia–thalamus network model. Neural Networks. 2022; 153:130-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2022.05.027
[12] Weyns D, Bäck T, Vidal R, Yao X, Belbachir AN. The vision of self-evolving computing systems. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science. 2023;26(3-4):351-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JID-220003
[13] Schmidgall S, Ziaei R, Achterberg J, Kirsch L, Hajiseyedrazi S, Eshraghian J. Brain-inspired learning in artificial neural networks: A review. APL Machine Learning. 2024;2(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0186054
[14] Al-Doori MB, Alheeti KM. Enhanced Intrusion Detection Using Deep Q-Network with Priority Experience Replay and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering & Systems. 2025; 18(4): 250. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.22266/ijies2025.0531.16
[15] Cao J, Wang X, Wang Y, Tian Y. An improved Dueling Deep Q-network with optimizing reward functions for driving decision method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. 2023; 237(9): 2295-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070221106037
[16] Malenka RC, Bear MF. LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron. 2004; 44(1):5-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.012
[17] Mfoumboulou YD, Mnguni ME. Development of a new linearizing controller using Lyapunov stability theory and model reference control. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. 2022. DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v25.i3.pp1328-1343
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mingzhe Hou, Zijun Liu, Qishen Lv

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.