Privacy-Preserving SACAA-Net: A Scale-Aware Consistency and Anomaly-Attentive Network for Fine-Grained Industrial Anomaly Detection in Secure Distributed Edge-IIoT Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.12925Keywords:
privacy-preserving edge intelligence, secure industrial anomaly detection, distributed industrial IoT, finegrained anomaly detection, data securityAbstract
Fine-grained industrial anomaly detection has become a core component of intelligent inspection in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) scenarios, particularly when visual data are continuously acquired and processed through distributed sensors together with edge devices. Yet once industrial visual data and model updates are distributed in this way, a series of security risks becomes difficult to avoid, including data leakage, unauthorized access, gradient inversion attacks, model poisoning, and privacy inference. What may be exposed through these risks is not only raw data itself, but also sensitive information related to equipment structure, production status, and enterprise operations. Under such conditions, privacy preservation is no longer optional; it is an essential requirement for real-world industrial deployment. Existing methods still concentrate mainly on representation learning under heterogeneous data distributions, while security constraints in distributed environments are often insufficiently considered. This can easily result in inconsistent feature representations and inadequate protection of privacy-sensitive information during both training and transmission. To address these issues, we propose Privacy-Preserving SACAA-Net for fine-grained industrial anomaly detection in secure distributed IIoT systems. The proposed model brings together cross-scale semantic consistency learning, anomaly-aware attention, and structural dependency modeling, with the goal of improving detection accuracy while retaining fine-grained details and overall structural information. For privacy-preserving deployment, SACAA-Net supports local training on edge devices, reduces the need for raw data sharing, and remains compatible with secure aggregation, differential privacy, and encrypted transmission, thereby helping mitigate the risks of information leakage and model inversion attacks.Extensive experiments on six industrial datasets demonstrate that SACAA-Net achieves superior performance in both accuracy and robustness, achieving average image-level and pixel-level AUROC scores of 96.4\% and 92.3\%, respectively, and outperforming the strongest baseline by 1.5\% and 1.8\% on these two metrics, providing an effective and secure solution for distributed industrial anomaly detection.
References
[1] Thomas AD, Rodd MG, Holt JD, Neill C. Real¬time industrial visual inspection: A review. Real-Time Imaging. 1995;1(2):139-58.
[2] Rožanec JM, Zajec P, Trajkova E, Šircelj B, Brecelj B, Novalija I, et al. Towards a comprehensive visual quality inspection for industry 4.0. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2022;55(10):690-5.
[3] Bergmann P, Fauser M, Sattlegger D, Steger C. MVTec AD–A comprehensive real-world dataset for unsupervised anomaly detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2019. p. 9592-600.
[4] Lin TY, Dollár P, Girshick R, He K, Hariharan B, Belongie S. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2017. p. 2117-25.
[5] Hu J, Shen L, Sun G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2018. p. 7132-41.
[6] Woo S, Park J, Lee JY, Kweon IS. Cbam: Convolutional block attention module. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV); 2018. p. 3-19.
[7] Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, et al. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems. 2017;30.
[8] Barford P, Kline J, Plonka D, Ron A. A signal analysis of network traffic anomalies. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet measurment; 2002. p. 71-82.
[9] Loy CC, Xiang T, Gong S. Detecting and discrim-inating behavioural anomalies. Pattern Recognition. 2011;44(1):117-32.
[10] Kirillov A, Girshick R, He K, Dollár P. Panoptic feature pyramid networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2019. p. 6399-408.
[11] Yi J, Yoon S. Patch SVDD: Patch-Level SVDD for Anomaly Detection and Segmentation. In: Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Springer; 2020. p. 375-90.
[12] Park S, Lee KH, Ko B, Kim N. Unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks in mammography. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):2925.
[13] Akcay S, Atapour-Abarghouei A, Breckon TP. Ganomaly: Semi-supervised anomaly detection via adversarial training. In: Asian conference on computer vision. Springer; 2018. p. 622-37.
[14] Li C, Chen Z, Wu QJ, Liu C. Deep saliency detection via channel-wise hierarchical feature responses. Neurocom-puting. 2018;322:80-92.
[15] Yu Y, Wei W, Zhao C, Qian J, Chen E. Structural feature enhanced transformer for fine-grained image recognition. Pattern Recognition. 2026;169:111955.
[16] Lyu N, Jiang J, Chang L, Shao C, Chen F, Zhang C. Improving pattern recognition of scheduling anomalies through structure-aware and semantically-enhanced graphs. In: Proceedings of the 2025 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Systems and Network Security; 2025. p. 63-70.
[17] Peter O, Pradhan A, Mbohwa C. Industrial inter-net of things (IIoT): opportunities, challenges, and requirements in manufacturing businesses in emerging economies. Procedia Computer Science. 2023;217:856-65.
[18] Munirathinam S. Industry 4.0: Industrial internet of things (IIOT). In: Advances in computers. vol. 117. Elsevier; 2020. p. 129-64.
[19] Mendez J, Bierzynski K, Cuéllar MP, Morales DP. Edge intelligence: concepts, architectures, applications, and future directions. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS). 2022;21(5):1-41.
[20] Deng S, Zhao H, Fang W, Yin J, Dustdar S, Zomaya AY. Edge intelligence: The confluence of edge computing and artificial intelligence. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2020;7(8):7457-69.
[21] Yang Y, Wu L, Yin G, Li L, Zhao H. A survey on security and privacy issues in Internet-of-Things. IEEE Internet of things Journal. 2017;4(5):1250-8.
[22] Defard T, Setkov A, Loesch A, Audigier R. Padim: a patch distribution modeling framework for anomaly detection and localization. In: International conference on pattern recognition. Springer; 2021. p. 475-89.
[23] Roth K, Pemula L, Zepeda J, Schölkopf B, Brox T, Gehler P. Towards total recall in industrial anomaly detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2022. p. 14318-28.
[24] Zavrtanik V, Kristan M, Skočaj D. Draem-a discrimi-natively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision; 2021. p. 8330-9.
[25] Li CL, Sohn K, Yoon J, Pfister T. Cutpaste: Self-supervised learning for anomaly detection and localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2021. p. 9664-74.
[26] Gudovskiy D, Ishizaka S, Kozuka K. Cflow-ad: Real¬time unsupervised anomaly detection with localization via conditional normalizing flows. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision; 2022. p. 98-107.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jiani Zeng, Xinyu He, Weixian Wang, Chenyu Jin, Hui Xu, Siyue Lu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.