A Cross-Domain Data Flow Security Governance and Privacy Protection Mechanism for Distributed Digital Art Platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.13268Keywords:
cross-domain data flow, distributed system security, privacy protection, dynamic access control, cross-chain audit, digital art platformAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Distributed digital art platforms face ownership ambiguity, privacy leakage, unauthorized access, and audit difficulties in cross-domain data flows.
OBJECTIVES: To enhance trust, privacy, controllability, and auditability through a dedicated data security governance mechanism.
METHODS: A closed-loop governance mechanism jointly models art data, AIGC models, copyrights, and transactions, integrating five coordinated modules: damage-tolerant ownership verification, privacy-preserving cross-chain auditing, dynamic access control, secure delivery with rollback, and efficient traceability.
RESULTS: Ownership confirmation reaches 97.9%–98.7% (mild perturbations) and 85.9% (combined); authorization accuracy: 95.6%; illegal access interception: 94.9%; normal transaction audit pass rate: 99.3%; anomaly detection: up to 100%; on-chain storage compression: 99.99% (50 MB); traceability success: 94.8%. Access latency remains below 20 ms with 180+ transactions/s under concurrency.
CONCLUSION: The mechanism effectively secures cross-domain data flows with high trustworthiness and low overhead, suitable for distributed digital art ecosystems.
References
[1] Azcoitia, S. A., & Laoutaris, N. (2022). A survey of data marketplaces and their business models. ACM SIGMOD Record, 51(3), 18–29.
[2] Fernandez, R. C., Subramaniam, P., & Franklin, M. J. (2020). Data market platforms: Trading data assets to solve data problems. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 13(12), 1933–1947.
[3] Zhang, M., Beltran, F., & Liu, J. (2023). A survey of data pricing for data marketplaces. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 9(4), 1038–1056.
[4] Spiekermann, S., Acquisti, A., Böhme, R., & Hui, K. L. (2015). The challenges of personal data markets and privacy. Electronic Markets, 25(2), 161–167.
[5] Jing, Y., Yang, Y., Feng, Z., Ye, J., Yu, Y., & Song, M. (2020). Neural style transfer: A review. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(11), 3365–3385.
[6] Chen, F. L., Zhang, D. Z., Han, M. L., Chen, X. Y., Shi, J., Xu, S., & Xu, B. (2023). VLP: A survey on vision-language pre-training. Machine Intelligence Research, 20(1), 38–56.
[7] Yang, L., Zhang, Z., Song, Y., Hong, S., Xu, R., Zhao, Y., Shao, Y., Zhang, W., Cui, B., & Yang, M. H. (2023). Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(4), 1–39.
[8] Croitoru, F. A., Hondru, V., Ionescu, R. T., & Shah, M. (2023). Diffusion models in vision: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(9), 10850–10868.
[9] Wang, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018). A blockchain-based framework for data sharing with fine-grained access control in decentralized storage systems. IEEE Access, 6, 38437–38450.
[10] Liu, D., Huang, C., Ni, J., Lin, X., & Shen, X. S. (2022). Blockchain-cloud transparent data marketing: Consortium management and fairness. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 71(12), 3322–3335.
[11] de Vos, M., Ileri, C. U., & Pouwelse, J. (2021). XChange: A blockchain-based mechanism for generic asset trading in resource-constrained environments. World Wide Web, 24(5), 1691–1728.
[12] Mühle, A., Grüner, A., Gayvoronskaya, T., & Meinel, C. (2018). A survey on essential components of a self-sovereign identity. Computer Science Review, 30, 80–86.
[13] Ferdous, M. S., Chowdhury, F., & Alassafi, M. O. (2019). In search of self-sovereign identity leveraging blockchain technology. IEEE Access, 7, 103059–103079.
[14] Li, H. (2026). A cloud environment security access control scheme based on federated learning and fuzzy logic integration. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.11731
[15] Hu, V. C., Kuhn, D. R., Ferraiolo, D. F., & Voas, J. (2015). Attribute-based access control. Computer, 48(2), 85–88.
[16] Park, J., & Sandhu, R. (2004). The UCONABCusage control model. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 7(1), 128–174.
[17] Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4), 211–417.
[18] Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., ... & Sethi, T. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.
[19] Guo, Z., Sun, Y., Zhang, X., & Wu, L. (2026). An efficient privacy-preserving secure aggregation scheme for federated learning with input verification and dropout resistance. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 12(8), 1–14.
[20] Bogdanov, D., Niitsoo, M., Toft, T., & Willemson, J. (2012). High-performance secure multi-party computation for data mining applications. International Journal of Information Security, 11(6), 403–418.
[21] Evans, D., Kolesnikov, V., & Rosulek, M. (2018). A pragmatic introduction to secure multi-party computation. Foundations and Trends in Privacy and Security, 2(2–3), 70–246.
[22] Xue, J., & Yan, W. (2026). Edge computing communication privacy protection method based on federated learning algorithm. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.12254
[23] Shamir, A. (1979). How to share a secret. Communications of the ACM, 22(11), 612–613.
[24] Abe, M., Fuchsbauer, G., Groth, J., Haralambiev, K., & Ohkubo, M. (2016). Structure-preserving signatures and commitments to group elements. Journal of Cryptology, 29(2), 363–421.
[25] Goldreich, O., & Oren, Y. (1994). Definitions and properties of zero-knowledge proof systems. Journal of Cryptology, 7(1), 1–32.
[26] Xue, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., & Liu, W. (2022). Intellectual property protection for deep learning models: Taxonomy, methods, attacks, and evaluations. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 3(6), 908–923.
[27] Li, Y., Wang, H., & Barni, M. (2021). A survey of deep neural network watermarking techniques. Neurocomputing, 461, 171–193.
[28] Cao Y, Li S, Liu Y, et al. A survey of AI-generated content (AIGC). ACM Computing Surveys, 2025, 57(5): 1-38.
[29] Chen Y, Vice J, Akhtar N, Haldar N A, Mian A. Image watermarking of generative diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10465, 2025.
[30] Chen Y, Akhtar N, Haldar N A, Mian A. Dynamic watermarks in images generated by diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08927, 2025.
[31] Chen Y, Ma Z, Fang H, Zhang W, Yu N. TAG-WM: Tamper-aware generative image watermarking via diffusion inversion sensitivity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23484, 2025.
[32] Jovanović N, Labiad I, Souček T, Vechev M, Fernandez P. Watermarking autoregressive image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.16349, 2025.
[33] Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity. C2PA technical specification: content credentials for digital provenance. C2PA, 2025.
[34] Zhang R, Li X, Wang Y, et al. A flexible and privacy-preserving cross-chain identity authentication system based on anonymous credentials. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, 2024.
[35] Chen Z, Liu H, Zhang L, Dai B, Shi Y. Research on key technologies for privacy-preserving, regulatorily compliant, and cross-chain interoperability in heterogeneous blockchain systems. Scientific Reports, 2026, 16: 12817.
[36] Yu H, Chen Y, Su S, Su J, Chen Y, Yang Z. DART: Distributed Zero Knowledge Data Auditing With Retrievability for Blockchain-Based Decentralized Storage Networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2025, 20: 11264-11278.
[37] Jin Z, Zhang X, Su J, Zhang L, Shen J. Subgraph-Driven Lightweight Federated Learning for Spatiotemporal Cellular Traffic Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2026, 23: 1435-1448.
[38] Jin Z, Yang C, Ye Y, Zhang L, Shen J, Su J. Mobility-Aware Semi-Asynchronous Federated Learning for Vehicular Networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2026, 75(2): 2001-2012.
[39] Su J, Jiang M. A Hybrid Entropy and Blockchain Approach for Network Security Defense in SDN-Based IIoT. Chinese Journal of Electronics, 2023, 32(3): 531-541.
[40] Xia C, Jin Z, Su J, Li B. Mobility-Aware Offloading and Resource Allocation Strategies in MEC Network Based on Game Theory. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2023, 2023: 5216943.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Meixuan Lv
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.
