Dual-Granularity Local Differential Privacy for Secure Distributed Graph Publishing in Decentralized Network Systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.13779

Keywords:

local differential privacy, decentralized graph publishing, dual-granularity privacy protection, synthetic graph generation

Abstract

Decentralized social, interaction, and edge-assisted graphs are commonly stored as local neighbor views rather than as a trusted centralized graph, making privacy-preserving collection and useful graph publication difficult. This paper presents DDP-DGP, an integrative dual-granularity local differential privacy framework for undirected and unweighted graphs. Each user perturbs coarse-grained degree information with a full-support, boundary-corrected random-jump mechanism and perturbs fine-grained neighbor indicators with bitwise randomized response. The fine-grained budget is explicitly divided across the |V|-1 indicators, providing a whole-neighbor-list guarantee by sequential composition; a degree-calibrated sampling rule then suppresses randomized-response densification. The publisher uses only privatized reports: inconsistent endpoint reports are reconciled probabilistically, communities are extracted from the privatized adjacency matrix, intra-community edges are generated with clipped Chung-Lu probabilities, and inter-community edges are sampled from counts computed exclusively from privatized data. The contribution is therefore positioned as a privacy-preserving integration and calibration strategy rather than a new differential-privacy primitive. Experiments on four public graph datasets evaluate degree distribution, modularity, eigenvector centrality, and average path length. The displayed results indicate improved structural fidelity for DDP-DGP under the tested privacy budgets.

References

[1] Frimpong SA, Han M, Effah EK, Adjei JK, Hanson I, Brown P. A deep decentralized privacy-preservation framework for online social networks. Blockchain Res Appl. 2024;5(4):100233.

[2] European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of 27 April 2016 (General Data Protection Regulation). Off J Eur Union. 2016;L119:1-88.

[3] Duchi JC, Jordan MI, Wainwright MJ. Local privacy and statistical minimax rates. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science; 26-29 October 2013; Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; 2013. p. 429-438.

[4] Warner SL. Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J Am Stat Assoc. 1965;60(309):63-69.

[5] Hay M, Li C, Miklau G, et al. Accurate estimation of the degree distribution of private networks. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining; 6-9 December 2009; Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; 2009. p. 169-178.

[6] Hawkins C, Chen B, Yazdani K, et al. Node and edge differential privacy for graph Laplacian spectra: mechanisms and scaling laws. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng. 2024;11(2):1690-1701.

[7] Gao Y, Chen XB, Wang L, Ma KG. Distributed graph publishing method based on dual-granularity privacy protection. J Comput Appl. 2026;46(7):2164-2173.

[8] Sun X, Sun L. Privacy preserving large-scale rating data publishing. EAI Endorsed Trans Scalable Inf Syst. 2013;1(1):e3.

[9] Rehman SU, Nawaz A, Ali T, Amin N. g-Sum: a graph summarization approach for a single large social network. EAI Endorsed Trans Scalable Inf Syst. 2021;8(32):e2.

[10] Iftikhar M, Wang Q, Lin Y. dK-microaggregation: anonymizing graphs with differential privacy guarantees. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 11-14 May 2020; Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 191-203.

[11] Gao T, Li F. Protecting social network with differential privacy under novel graph model. IEEE Access. 2020;8:185276-185289.

[12] Huang H, Zhang D, Xiao F, Wang K, Gu J, Wang R. Privacy-preserving approach PBCN in social network with differential privacy. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag. 2020;17(2):931-945.

[13] Kang HY, Ji YR, Zhang SX. Enhanced privacy preserving for social networks relational data based on personalized differential privacy. Chin J Electron. 2022;31(4):741-751.

[14] Gao R, Chen XB, Gu Z, et al. Social network graph generation method satisfying personalized differential privacy. J Taiyuan Univ Technol. 2024;55(1):163-171.

[15] Zhang M, Zhou J, Zhang G, Cui L, Gao T, Yu S. APDP: attribute-based personalized differential privacy data publishing scheme for social networks. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng. 2022;10(2):922-933.

[16] Li Y, Tao X, Zhang X, Wang M, Wang S. Break the data barriers while keeping privacy: a graph differential privacy method. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023;10(5):3840-3850.

[17] Yuan Q, Zhang Z, Du L, Chen M, Cheng P, Sun M. PrivGraph: differentially private graph data publication by exploiting community information. In: Proceedings of the 32nd USENIX Security Symposium; 9-11 August 2023; Berkeley, CA: USENIX Association; 2023. p. 3241-3258.

[18] Hou L, Ni W, Zhang S, Fu N, Zhang D. PPDU: dynamic graph publication with local differential privacy. Knowl Inf Syst. 2023;65(7):2965-2989.

[19] Gao R, Chen XB, Zhang ZC. Dynamic social network privacy publishing method for partial graph updating. J Comput Appl. 2024;44(12):3831-3838.

[20] Qin Z, Yu T, Yang Y, Khalil I, Xiao X, Ren K. Generating synthetic decentralized social graphs with local differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security; 30 October-3 November 2017; New York, NY: ACM; 2017. p. 425-438.

[21] Wei C, Ji S, Liu C, Chen W, Wang T. AsgLDP: collecting and generating decentralized attributed graphs with local differential privacy. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2020;15:3239-3254.

[22] Lin WY, Li BC, Wang C. Towards private learning on decentralized graphs with local differential privacy. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2022;17:2936-2946.

[23] Fu N, Ni W, Hou L, Zhang D, Zhang R. Community detection in decentralized social networks with local differential privacy. Inf Sci. 2024;661:120164.

[24] Guo T, Peng S, Zhang Z, Yang M, Lam KY. Improving the accuracy of locally differentially private community detection by order-consistent data perturbation. In: Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval; 14-18 July 2024; New York, NY: ACM; 2024. p. 1743-1752.

[25] Li Z, Li RH, Liao M, Jin F, Wang G. Privacy-preserving graph embedding based on local differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management; 21-25 October 2024; New York, NY: ACM; 2024. p. 1316-1325.

[26] Xu W, Qiao P, Liu S, Zheng Z, Cao Y, Li Z. Continuous publication of weighted graphs with local differential privacy. Proc VLDB Endow. 2025;18(11):4214-4226.

[27] Imola J, Murakami T, Chaudhuri K. Communication-efficient triangle counting under local differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 31st USENIX Security Symposium; 10-12 August 2022; Berkeley, CA: USENIX Association; 2022. p. 537-554.

[28] Dwork C, Roth A. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Found Trends Theor Comput Sci. 2014;9(3-4):211-407.

[29] Yang M, Guo T, Zhu T, Tjuawinata I, Zhao J, Lam KY. Local differential privacy and its applications: a comprehensive survey. Comput Stand Interfaces. 2024;89:103827.

[30] Christofides TC. A generalized randomized response technique. Metrika. 2003;57(2):195-200.

[31] Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp. 2008;2008(10):P10008.

[32] Aiello W, Chung F, Lu L. A random graph model for massive graphs. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing; 21-23 May 2000; New York, NY: ACM; 2000. p. 171-180.

[33] Chung F, Lu L. Connected components in random graphs with given expected degree sequences. Ann Comb. 2002;6(2):125-145.

Downloads

Published

07-10-2026

Issue

Section

Data Security and Privacy Protection in New Distributed Networks and System

How to Cite

1.
Chang Z. Dual-Granularity Local Differential Privacy for Secure Distributed Graph Publishing in Decentralized Network Systems. EAI Endorsed Scal Inf Syst [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 7 [cited 2026 Oct. 14];13(6). Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/sis/article/view/13779