An OpenHarmony-Based AI-Driven Edge Intelligence Framework for Manufacturing Disruption Monitoring and Resilient Response

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.13806

Keywords:

Manufacturing resilience, disruption monitoring, edge intelligence, industrial patrol, OpenHarmony, SparkLink SLE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Delayed awareness of hazards and route restrictions can weaken manufacturing continuity.

OBJECTIVES: To develop an OpenHarmony-based edge-intelligence framework for disruption monitoring and resilient patrol response.

METHODS: A WS63 controller performs local sensing and PID control; SparkLink SLE transmits compact frames to a Jetson Nano running a GSConv- and MSAA-enhanced YOLOv10-N detector; an ArkTS/ArkUI application presents warnings and fallback status.

RESULTS: At 3 m line of sight, SLE achieved 4.8 ± 1.2 ms RTT, 67.1% lower than matched Wi-Fi/UDP and 72.1% lower than BLE. The detector reached 83.96% mAP50, 51.74% mAP50:95, 28.3 FPS, and 3.08 FPS/W. In 500 trials, recognition accuracy was 94.0% and mean alert latency was 97.9 ± 22.6 ms.

CONCLUSION: The prototype supports timely warning and continuity-oriented fallback, but evidence is limited to one robot, short-range line-of-sight tests, and traffic-sign-derived proxy events.

References

[1] J. Liu, G. Xie, J. Wang, S. Li, C. Wang, F. Zheng, and Y. Jin, “Deep industrial image anomaly detection: A survey,” Machine Intelligence Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 104–135, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11633-023-1459-z.

[2] L. Lin, J. Guo, and L. Liu, “Multi-scene application of intelligent inspection robot based on computer vision in power plant,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, art. 10657, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56795-8.

[3] J. Lee, S. Siahpour, X. Jia, and P. Brown, “Introduction to resilient manufacturing systems,” Manufacturing Letters, vol. 32, pp. 24-27, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.02.002.

[4] J. Leng, J. Xie, R. Li, X. Zhou, X. Gu, Q. Liu, X. Chen, W. Zhang, and A. Kusiak, “Resilient manufacturing: A review of disruptions, assessment, and pathways,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 79, pp. 563-583, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.02.006.

[5] V. Shukla, A. Shukla, S. P. S. K., and S. Shukla, “A systematic survey: Role of deep learning-based image anomaly detection in industrial inspection contexts,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 12, art. 1554196, 2025, doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1554196.

[6] W. Chen, W. Chi, S. Ji, H. Ye, J. Liu, Y. Jia, J. Yu, and J. Cheng, “A survey of autonomous robots and multi-robot navigation: Perception, planning and collaboration,” Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics, vol. 5, no. 2, art. 100203, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.birob.2024.100203.

[7] K. Kobayashi, S. Ueno, and T. Higuchi, “Multi-robot patrol with continuous connectivity and assessment of base station situation awareness,” Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 526–537, 2024, doi: 10.20965/jrm.2024.p0526.

[8] Z. R. Madin, J. Lawry, and E. R. Hunt, “Collective anomaly perception during multi-robot patrol: Constrained interactions can promote accurate consensus,” in Proc. 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, 2024, pp. 630-637, doi: 10.1145/3605098.3635975.

[9] M. Groshev, G. Baldoni, L. Cominardi, A. de la Oliva, and R. Gazda, “Edge robotics: Are we ready? An experimental evaluation of current vision and future directions,” Digital Communications and Networks, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 166–174, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.dcan.2022.04.032.

[10] N. Tahir and R. Parasuraman, “Edge computing and its application in robotics: A survey,” Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, vol. 14, no. 4, art. 65, 2025, doi: 10.3390/jsan14040065.

[11] J. L. Mela and C. García Sánchez, “Yolo-based power-efficient object detection on edge devices for USVs,” Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, vol. 22, art. 108, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11554-025-01682-2.

[12] J. Krejčí, M. Babiuch, J. Suder, V. Krys, and Z. Bobovský, “Latency-sensitive wireless communication in dynamically moving robots for urban mobility applications,” Smart Cities, vol. 8, no. 4, art. 105, 2025, doi: 10.3390/smartcities8040105.

[13] M. L. Gambo, A. Danasabe, B. Almadani, F. Aliyu, A. Aliyu, and E. Al-Nahari, “A systematic literature review of DDS middleware in robotic systems,” Robotics, vol. 14, no. 5, art. 63, 2025, doi: 10.3390/robotics14050063.

[14] OpenAtom OpenHarmony, “OpenHarmony Project Overview,” OpenHarmony Documentation, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/openharmony/docs/blob/master/en/OpenHarmony-Overview.md. Accessed: Jul. 30, 2026.

[15] M. Gao, L. Wan, R. Shen, Y. Gao, J. Wang, Y. Li, and B. Vucetic, “SparkLink: A short-range wireless communication protocol with ultra-low latency and ultra-high reliability,” The Innovation, vol. 4, no. 2, art. 100386, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100386.

[16] B. Liu, Z. Ren, Y. Zhang, M. Li, J. Liang, B. He, J. Li, H. Wu, and J. Zhou, “Unveiling SparkLink Low Energy: A comparative measurement study,” ACM Transactions on Internet of Things, vol. 7, no. 1, art. 6, pp. 1-24, 2026, doi: 10.1145/3776559.

[17] S. Macenski, T. Foote, B. Gerkey, C. Lalancette, and W. Woodall, “Robot Operating System 2: Design, architecture, and uses in the wild,” Science Robotics, vol. 7, no. 66, art. eabm6074, 2022, doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abm6074.

[18] Y. Maruyama, S. Kato, and T. Azumi, “Exploring the performance of ROS2,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Embedded Software, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2016, pp. 1–10, doi: 10.1145/2968478.2968502.

[19] HiSilicon, “Hi3863V100: Wi-Fi 6 and NearLink multi-mode IoT SoC,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.hisilicon.com/en/products/connectivity/short-range-iot/wifi-nearlink-ble/hi3863v100. Accessed: Jul. 30, 2026.

[20] L. Mérida-Calvo, A. San-Millán Rodríguez, F. Ramos, and V. Feliu-Batlle, “Advanced motor control for improving the trajectory tracking accuracy of a low-cost mobile robot,” Machines, vol. 11, no. 1, art. 14, 2023, doi: 10.3390/machines11010014.

[21] A. Wang, H. Chen, L. Liu, K. Chen, Z. Lin, J. Han, and G. Ding, “YOLOv10: Real-time end-to-end object detection,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, 2024, doi: 10.52202/079017-3429.

[22] H. Li, J. Li, H. Wei, Z. Liu, Z. Zhan, and Q. Ren, “Slim-neck by GSConv: A lightweight-design for real-time detector architectures,” Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, vol. 21, no. 3, art. 62, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11554-024-01436-6.

[23] R. Reveles-Martínez, H. Gamboa-Rosales, E. Sánchez-Femat, J. Saldívar-Pérez, T. Ibarra-Pérez, L. C. Reveles-Gómez, O. A. Guirette-Barbosa, J. I. Galván-Tejada, C. E. Galván-Tejada, and J. M. Celaya-Padilla, “Benchmarking YOLOv8 to YOLOv11 architectures for real-time traffic sign recognition in embedded 1:10 scale autonomous vehicles,” Technologies, vol. 13, no. 11, art. 531, 2025, doi: 10.3390/technologies13110531.

[24] Z. Zhu, D. Liang, S. Zhang, X. Huang, B. Li, and S. Hu, “Traffic-sign detection and classification in the wild,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2016, pp. 2110–2118, doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.232.

[25] Ultralytics, “Ultralytics YOLO11,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolo11/. Accessed: Jul. 30, 2026.

[26] R. O. Duda and P. E. Hart, “Use of the Hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 1972, doi: 10.1145/361237.361242.

[27] Y. Shi, X. Zhang, Q. Wang, and X. Liu, “Public security patrol and alert recognition for police patrol robots based on improved YOLOv8 algorithm,” Mathematical and Computational Applications, vol. 30, no. 5, art. 97, 2025, doi: 10.3390/mca30050097.

[28] Q. Zou, H. Wang, T. Zhang, Z. Li, and Y. Zhuang, “Research on path planning method for autonomous patrol robots,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 14, art. 2865, 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13142865.

Downloads

Published

07-09-2026

Issue

Section

Resiliency and Adaptability for Future Manufacturing: AI Driven Recovery and Response Mechanisms

How to Cite

1.
Zhang B, Zhuo Y, Chen Z, Xian Z, Huang C, Chen J, et al. An OpenHarmony-Based AI-Driven Edge Intelligence Framework for Manufacturing Disruption Monitoring and Resilient Response. EAI Endorsed Scal Inf Syst [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 7 [cited 2026 Sep. 10];13(3). Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/sis/article/view/13806