A Blockchain- and Zero-Knowledge–Proof-Based framework for manufacturing Data-Asset qualification verification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.14301Keywords:
dynamic qualification, context binding, separated state updates, layered data admission, industrial data spacesAbstract
In cross-enterprise manufacturing data spaces involving device-generated batches under dynamic authorization, trusted data sharing requires consistent verification of device identity, batch state, and current access qualification. Existing approaches either verify batch evidence and qualification states separately, which may weaken cross-context consistency, or combine them into a monolithic proof that requires unnecessary recomputation when authorization, revocation, or rule states change. To address this problem, this study proposes a state-aware dual-proof framework that separates a relatively stable data sub-proof from an epoch-specific qualification sub-proof while binding both through a shared device–asset–batch–qualification context. The framework further incorporates finalized-state synchronization, a context-bound nullifier for replay prevention, and auxiliary risk screening applied only after deterministic cryptographic qualification. Experiments on two public manufacturing datasets, with authorization, revocation, epoch, and attack states constructed under a unified protocol, show that the proposed method achieves Mean CARR values of 98.2% on CONTEXT and 97.1% on IoT-Enriched, with valid-request acceptance rates of 98.3% and 98.0%, respectively. Separated updating reduces qualification-update latency from 83.1 ms to 20.3 ms, corresponding to a 75.6% update redundancy reduction. Auxiliary risk admission achieves a Macro-F1 of 90.7% with a 4.9% false rejection rate. Scalability evaluation further shows that the main bottleneck shifts toward blockchain queuing and confirmation under high concurrency. These results indicate that context binding, separated state updates, and layered admission provide an effective verification strategy for cross-enterprise manufacturing data sharing with frequently changing qualifications.
References
[1] Gabellini M, Civolani L, Ronchi M, Naldi LD, Regattieri A. Data spaces in manufacturing and supply chains: a review and insights from European initiatives. Appl Sci (Basel). 2025;15(11):5802. doi: 10.3390/app15115802.
[2] Mabkhot MM, Kalawsky RS, Liaqat A. Introducing the manufacturing digital passport (MDP): a new concept for realising digital thread data sharing in aerospace and complex manufacturing. Systems (Basel). 2025;13(8):700. doi: 10.3390/systems13080700.
[3] Tapia E, Sastoque-Pinilla L, Gamecho B, Lopez-Novoa U. Integration of blockchain-based digital identity management in an aeronautical manufacturing setting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s00170-025-16260-w. [Epub ahead of print].
[4] Li C, Yu T, Li W, Liu Y, Yang H. Enhancing CAD data integrity and security in supply chain networks using blockchain. Int J Inf Syst Supply Chain Manag. 2025;18(1):1-22. doi: 10.4018/IJISSCM.389716.
[5] Cortés-Santacruz F, Carrillo-Martínez LA, García-Bañuelos L, Fortoul-Díaz JA. DLT in manufacturing: a systematic review of applications, taxonomy, enablers, maturity, and challenges. Results Eng. 2026;29:108277. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108277.
[6] Zhang T, Wang Y, Gong B, Xu J, Wu J, Wan C. Privacy protection during the issuance and revocation of verifiable credentials in self-sovereign identity. Concurr Comput. 2025;37(9-11):e70084. doi: 10.1002/cpe.70084.
[7] Wu Y, Matsubara Y, Kasahara S. Enhancing account information anonymity in blockchain-based IoT access control using zero-knowledge proofs. Electronics (Basel). 2025;14(14):2772. doi: 10.3390/electronics14142772.
[8] Sud E, Agarwal S, Upadhyay L. The power I know: zero-knowledge proofs and their transformative role in the future of cryptography. IEEE Access. 2025;13:147317-29. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3599555.
[9] Liu M, Yang T, Shi W, Vasilakos AV, Lu N. ESDI: an efficient and secure data integrity verification scheme for indoor navigation. Future Gener Comput Syst. 2025;168:107759. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2025.107759.
[10] Liu Z, Lei Z, Wen G, Xi Y, Su Y, Feng K, et al. Anomaly detection of machinery under time-varying operating conditions based on state-space and neural network modeling. Adv Eng Inform. 2025;65:103285. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2025.103285.
[11] Logrippo L. Data flow security in role-based access control. J Inf Secur Appl. 2025;90:103997. doi: 10.1016/j.jisa.2025.103997.
[12] Cao Z, Wen X, Ai S, Shang W, Huan S. A decentralized authentication scheme for smart factory based on blockchain. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):24640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76065-x.
[13] Lee Y, Shin H, Choi D. A survey on credential revocation and DID deactivation in self-sovereign identity systems. IEEE Access. 2026;14:16089-115. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3649792.
[14] Čučko Š, Turkanović M. A novel model for authority and access delegation utilizing self-sovereign identity and verifiable credentials. IEEE Access. 2025;13:115102-34. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3582312.
[15] de Diego S, Gutiérrez-Aguero I. Decentralized digital product passport building blocks for enhancing supply chain sovereignty and circular economy practices. IEEE Access. 2025;13:137973-85. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3594826.
[16] Ali G, Shah S, Elaffendi M, Ahmad N. Blockchain-based access management framework for interoperable digital twins in industrial IoT. Front Blockchain. 2025;8:1693926. doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2025.1693926.
[17] Xiao L, Sun W, Chang S, Lu C, Jiang R. Research on the construction of a blockchain-based industrial product full life cycle information traceability system. Appl Sci (Basel). 2024;14(11):4569. doi: 10.3390/app14114569.
[18] Hulea M, Miron R, Muresan V. Digital product passport implementation based on multi-blockchain approach with decentralized identifier provider. Appl Sci (Basel). 2024;14(11):4874. doi: 10.3390/app14114874.
[19] Voulgaridis K, Lagkas T, Angelopoulos CM, Boulogeorgos AAA, Argyriou V, Sarigiannidis P. Digital product passports as enablers of digital circular economy: a framework based on technological perspective. Telecommun Syst. 2024;85(4):699-715. doi: 10.1007/s11235-024-01104-x.
[20] Zheng K, Ding K, Hui J, Zhang F, Lv J, Chan FTS. Blockchain-based credible manufacturing data sharing for a collaborative manufacturing supply chain. Int J Prod Res. 2024;62(6):2233-54. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2217292.
[21] Jarosz M, Wrona K, Zieliński Z. Distributed ledger-based authentication and authorization of IoT devices in federated environments. Electronics (Basel). 2024;13(19):3932. doi: 10.3390/electronics13193932.
[22] Nizamis A, Gkonis P, Ioannidis D, Ntafalias A, Tzovaras D, Trakadas P. Manufacturing data spaces applications in Europe—a survey. Data Brief. 2025;63:112149. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.112149.
[23] Li D, Ke X, Zhang X, Zhang Y. A trusted and regulated data trading scheme based on blockchain and zero-knowledge proof. IET Blockchain. 2024;4(4):443-55. doi: 10.1049/blc2.12070.
[24] Flamini A, Sciarretta G, Scuro M, Sharif A, Tomasi A, Ranise S. On cryptographic mechanisms for the selective disclosure of verifiable credentials. J Inf Secur Appl. 2024;83:103789. doi: 10.1016/j.jisa.2024.103789.
[25] Begum N, Nakanishi T. Issuer-revocable issuer-hiding attribute-based credentials using an accumulator. In: 2023 Eleventh International Symposium on Computing and Networking (CANDAR); 2023 Nov 28-Dec 1; Matsue, Japan. Los Alamitos (CA): IEEE Computer Society; 2023. p. 93-9. doi: 10.1109/CANDAR60563.2023.00019.
[26] Zhou L, Diro A, Saini A, Kaisar S, Hiep PC. Leveraging zero knowledge proofs for blockchain-based identity sharing: a survey of advancements, challenges and opportunities. J Inf Secur Appl. 2024;80:103678. doi: 10.1016/j.jisa.2023.103678.
[27] Li D, Crespi N, Minerva R, Liang W, Li KC, Kołodziej J. DPS-IIoT: non-interactive zero-knowledge proof-inspired access control towards information-centric Industrial Internet of Things. Comput Commun. 2025;233:108065. doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2025.108065.
[28] Madine M, Salah K, Jayaraman R, Yaqoob I. Zero-knowledge proofs for anonymous authentication of patients on public and private blockchains. Array. 2025;28:100590. doi: 10.1016/j.array.2025.100590.
[29] Zhu X, Song X, Deng Y, Yang G. Fast and designated-verifier friendly zk-SNARKs in the BPK model. Cybersecurity. 2025;8(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s42400-025-00432-y.
[30] Liang C, Zhang J, Ma S, Zhou Y, Hong Z, Fang J, et al. Study on data storage and verification methods based on improved Merkle mountain range in IoT scenarios. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. 2024;36(6):102117. doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.102117.
[31] Du R, Wang Z, Shen J. Certificateless data integrity auditing with sparse Merkle trees for the cloud-edge environment. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):39202. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14041-9.
[32] Li Z, Zheng P, Tian Y. Application of IoT and blockchain technology in the integration of innovation and industrial chains in high-tech manufacturing. Alex Eng J. 2025;119:465-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2025.01.020.
[33] Ali H, Cano A, Ahmed I. Machine learning-based early detection of malicious G-code manipulations in 3D printing. J Manuf Process. 2025;145:211-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.04.012.
[34] Kumar R, Sharma R. AI-driven dynamic trust management and blockchain-based security in industrial IoT. Comput Electr Eng. 2025;123:110213. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110213.
[35] Wang P, Yue Y, Sun W, Liu J. An attribute-based distributed access control for blockchain-enabled IoT. In: 2019 International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob); 2019 Oct 21-23; Barcelona, Spain. New York: IEEE; 2019. p. 1-6. doi: 10.1109/WiMOB.2019.8923232.
[36] Liu H, Han D, Li D. Fabric-IoT: a blockchain-based access control system in IoT. IEEE Access. 2020;8:18207-18. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968492.
[37] Lu N, Zhang Y, Shi W, Kumari S, Choo KKR. A secure and scalable data integrity auditing scheme based on Hyperledger Fabric. Comput Secur. 2020;92:101741. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2020.101741.
[38] Li Y, Shen J, Ji S, Lai YH. Blockchain-based data integrity verification scheme in AIoT cloud-edge computing environment. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 2024;71:12556-65. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2023.3262678.
[39] Zhu J, Zhang GY. Blockchain-based smart and secure manufacturing systems. Internet Technol Lett. 2025;8(4):e589. doi: 10.1002/itl2.589.
[40] Alqazzaz A. SecuFL-IoT: an adaptive privacy-preserving federated learning framework for anomaly detection in smart industrial networks. Sci Rep. 2026;16(1):4107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11883-1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yujuan Xie

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.