The Fuzzy AHP for Prioritizing Factors in the Selection of Shipping Lines within the Maritime Transport Market in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsmre.9150Keywords:
Shipping line selection, Freight forwarders , Fuzzy AHPAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Selecting suitable shipping lines is crucial for supply chain efficiency, particularly in Vietnam’s maritime sector.
OBJECTIVES: This study seeks to identify and prioritise key criteria affecting shipping line selection from the perspective of freight forwarders.
METHODS: The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) was applied to evaluate multiple decision-making factors.
RESULTS: Competitive freight rates, container availability, and special cargo capabilities were ranked as the most influential criteria.
CONCLUSION: Findings highlight the need for carriers to enhance service reliability and cost-efficiency to meet the demands of developing markets.
References
[1] Stopford, M. (2008). Maritime Economics 3e. London: Taylor & Francis e-Library. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891742
[2] Schnurr, R. E., Walker, T. R., (2019). Marine transportation and energy use. Elsevier eBooks. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09270-8
[3] Walker et al. (2019). Chapter 27 - Environmental Effects of Marine Transportation. In Elsevier eBooks, 505-530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805052-1.00030-9
[4] Ngan, B. (2024, 03 31). Maritime and inland waterway transport remain underutilised despite their advantages. Available online at: https://nhandan.vn/van-tai-bien-va-duong-thuy-chua-tuong-xung-loi-the-post802462.html (accessed 08 March 2025).
[5] Ministry of Transport. (2022, 12 14). Promoting the development of the international maritime fleet. Available online at: https://mt.gov.vn/tk/tin-tuc/85866/day-manh-phat-trien-doi-tau-van-tai-bien-quoc-te-.aspx (accessed 10 March 2025).
[6] UNCTAD. (2024). Review of maritime transport 2024: Navigating maritime chokepoints. United Nations.
[7] Huong N. 2024. Shipping costs continue to climb. 05 31.https://vir.com.vn/shipping-costs-continue-to-climb-111566.html (accessed 18 April 2025).
[8] Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry. 2021. Doing business in Vietnam 2021. 11 28. https://vcci-hcm.org.vn/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/DOING-BUSINESS-IN-VIETNAM-2021.pdf (accessed 20 April 2025).
[9] Viet Nam News. 2024. Vietnamese enterprises adapt to green logistics trend. 12 26.. https://vietnamnews.vn/economy/1689682/vietnamese-enterprises-adapt-to-green-logistics-trend.html (accessed 20 April 2025).
[10] Garg, C. P., Kashav, V. (2019). Evaluating value creating factors in greening the transportation of Global Maritime Supply Chains (GMSCs) of containerized freight. Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment, 162-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.06.011
[11] Pham, T. Y., Truong, N. C., Nguyen, P. H., & Kim, H. (2024). The fuzzy MCDM for container terminal choice in Vietnam from shipping lines’ perspective based on cumulative prospect theory. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 147–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2024.06.003
[12] Zaid, F., Gazder, U., & Barbieri, D. M. (2024). Multi-criteria analysis for freight transport decision-making with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A top management’s perspective for Bahrain. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 101017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101017
[13] Permata, S. D., & Singgih, M. L. (2024). Strategic Decision-Making for Shipping Line Selection using Fuzzy AHP and MOLP. Advances in engineering research/Advances in Engineering Research, 318-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-566-9_21
[14] Ergin, A., Alkan, G. (2023). The Selection of Ocean Container Carrier: An Analytic Network Process (ANP) Approach. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 159-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2023.96977
[15] Ho, T., Chiu, R., Chung, C., & Lee, H. (2017). Key influence factors for ocean freight forwarders selecting container shipping lines using the revised dematel approach. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 6.
[16] Liu, D., Ding, J., Liang, G., & Ye, K. (2020). Use of the Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method to select the most attractive container port. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 92–104.
[17] Kannan, V., Bose, S., & Kannan, N. (2011). An evaluation of ocean container carrier selection criteria: an Indian shipper’s perspective. Management Research Review, 754 - 772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171111146661
[18] Shen, L., Mathiyazhagan, K., Kannan, D. & Ying, W. (2015). Study on analysing the criteria’s for selection of shipping carriers in Chinese shipping market using analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 742-757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2015.072685
[19] Abshire, R.D., S.R. Premeaux. (1991). Motor Carriers’ and Shippers’ Perceptions of the Carrier Choice Decision. The Logistics and Transportation Review, 351-358.
[20] Lambert, D. M., Lewis, C., & James, R. (1993). How Shippers Select and Evaluate General Commodities LTL Motor Carriers. Journal of Business Logistics, 14.
[21] Ben-Akiva, M., Bolduc, D. and Park, J.Q. (2013). Discrete Choice Analysis of Shippers’ Preferences. London, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/9781781902868-006
[22] Brooks, M.R.,. 1984. "An alternative theoretical approach to the evaluation of liner shipping: part I. situational factors." Maritime Policy and Management 35-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03088838400000032
[23] Murphy, P.R., Daley, J.M. and Dalenberg, D.R. (1991). ‘Selecting links and nodes in international transportation: an intermediary’s perspective. Transportation Journal, 33-40.
[24] Zadeh. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 338-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
[25] Bakır, M., Atalık, O. (2021). Application of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy MARCOS Approach for the Evaluation of E-Service Quality in the Airline Industry. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 127-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2104127b
[26] Zolfani, S. H., Sedaghat, M., Zavadskas, E. K. (2012). Performance evaluating of rural ICT centers (telecenters), applying fuzzy AHP, SAW-G and TOPSIS Grey, a case study in Iran. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 364-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.685110
[27] Papadopoulos, C., Spiliotis, M., Pliakas, F., Gkiougkis, I., Kazakis, N., & Papadopoulos, B. (2022). Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria analysis for selecting discrete preferable groundwater recharge sites. Water, 107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010107
[28] Maloni, M. J., Gligor, D. M., & Lagoudis, I. N. (2016). Linking ocean container carrier capabilities to shipper–carrier relationships: a case study. Maritime Policy & Management, 959–975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2016.1173736
[29] Harris, I., Wang, Y., & Wang, H. (2014). ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends: Unleashing potential for the future. International Journal of Production Economics, 88–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.005
[30] Notteboom, T., Haralambides, H. & Cullinane, K. (2024). The Red Sea Crisis: ramifications for vessel operations, shipping networks, and maritime supply chains. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-024-00287-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Xuan-Hoang Anh Dang, Thuy-Trang Nguyen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.
