Cost Optimization for Electronic Waste Recovery in a Reverse Logistics Network

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsmre.9505

Keywords:

Reverse Logistics, Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP), Electronic Waste (e-waste)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The rapid advancement of science and technology has fueled the widespread adoption of electronic devices, ranging from semiconductors to complex electronic circuits. These devices, typically classified into large household appliances, IT and telecommunications equipment, and consumer electronics, have significantly enhanced both the quality of life and operational efficiency in businesses. However, the increasing volume of these electronics has introduced a major challenge: the effective management of electronic waste (e - waste). Without a well - designed system, the accumulation of e - waste can lead to severe environmental and public health consequences.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to address the pressing issue of e-waste by analyzing the costs associated with its processing and proposing an optimized reverse logistics network. Specifically, the primary goal is to design a system that not only reduces operational costs but also minimizes the environmental footprint associated with e - waste management. By leveraging advanced modeling techniques, the research seeks to provide a practical framework that can be adopted in both industrial and municipal settings.

METHODS: To achieve these objectives, a Mixed - Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model was developed to represent the cost optimization problem associated with e - waste collection and recycling. The model incorporates various stages of the reverse logistics process, including collection, sorting, transportation, and final processing. Its solution was derived using CPLEX optimization software, which allowed for the identification of the most cost - effective network configuration. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of the proposed framework, enabling stakeholders to make informed decisions based on different scenarios and constraints.

RESULTS: The MILP model produced an optimized solution that minimizes recovery costs while maximizing the retrieval of reusable components and materials. In addition, the study found that incorporating sustainability factors into the model significantly improved the overall efficiency of the reverse logistics network. The optimized configuration demonstrates the potential of a well - structured reverse logistics system to reduce processing expenses, improve resource efficiency, and encourage the reuse of valuable materials, ultimately contributing to a more circular economy.

CONCLUSION: Improper disposal of electronic waste presents significant environmental and health risks, particularly during the mechanical and chemical treatment of circuit boards. By introducing an optimized reverse logistics model, this study offers a practical solution that reduces processing costs, promotes resource conservation, and supports long - term environmental sustainability. Moreover, the findings underscore the importance of integrating advanced optimization techniques into the design of e - waste management systems, paving the way for more sustainable and cost - effective practices.

References

[1] United Nations University, International Telecommunication Union, International Solid Waste Association. The Global E-waste Monitor 2020: Quantities, flows and the circular economy potential. 2020. Available from: https://ewastemonitor.info/ Accessed 2025 Apr 13.

[2] Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (Vietnam). National Environmental Report: Solid and Hazardous Waste Management 2020–2023. 2023.

[3] Griffith Research Online. Current status of e-waste management in Vietnam. 2023. Available from: https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/server/api/core/bitstreams/160b777a-33e8-4e18-8a2b-0261831192fe/content Accessed 2024 Apr 15.

[4] ResearchGate. The material flows from e-waste in Vietnam. 2017. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-material-flows-from-e-waste-in-Vietnam_fig1_316270056 Accessed 2025 Aug 17.

[5] Kaya M. Recovery of metals and nonmetals from electronic waste by physical and chemical recycling processes. Waste Manag. 2016;57:64–90. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.08.004.

[6] Saputra D, et al. Economic incentives and market structures in e-waste recycling under EPR. Environ Econ Policy Stud. 2020;22(2):267–80.

[7] Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Dekker R, van der Laan E, van Nunen JAEE, Van Wassenhove LN. Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review. Berlin: Springer; 2001.

[8] Thierry M, Salomon M, van Nunen JAEE, Van Wassenhove LN. Strategic issues in product recovery management. Calif Manage Rev. 1995;37(2):114–35.

[9] Alumur SA, Nickel S, Saldanha-da-Gama F, Verter V. Multi-period reverse logistics network design. Eur J Oper Res. 2012;220(1):67–78.

[10] Özceylan E. A mixed integer linear programming model for reverse logistics network design. Comput Ind Eng. 2013;66(2):618–32.

[11] Eskandarpour M, Dejax P, Miemczyk J, Péton O. Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review. Omega. 2014;54:11–32.

[12] Islam MT, Huda N. Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)/e-waste: A comprehensive literature review. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;137:48–75.

[13] Krikke H, le Blanc I, van de Velde S. Product modularity and the design of closed-loop supply chains. Calif Manage Rev. 2003;46(2):23–39.

[14] Ravi V, Shankar R, Tiwari MK. Analyzing alternatives for the reverse logistics of E-waste. Int J Prod Res. 2005;43(5):1015–35.

[15] Kara S, Manmek S, Kaebernick H. Reconfiguring logistics networks to improve the collection of waste from end-of-life products. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 2007;23(6):679–85.

[16] Shevchenko T, van Nederveen S, Wamelink H. Circular business models for the built environment. J Clean Prod. 2019;223:10–26.

[17] Kumar R, Saini R. Designing a reverse logistics network under uncertainty for e-waste management. J Clean Prod. 2020;256:120350.

[18] Sajan T, John T, Babu KP, Suresh M. Reverse logistics network design: A case of mobile phones and digital cameras. J Clean Prod. 2017;141:506–17.

[19] Wang J, et al. The effects of recycling and treatment methods for e-waste recovery. J Environ Manag. 2011;93(1):67–79.

[20] Kaya M, Çetin B, Güngör A. A sustainable recycling model for waste electronic appliances. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2017;124:46–55.

[21] Srivastava SK. Network design for reverse logistics. Omega. 2008;36(4):535–48.

[22] Kaya O, et al. Role of storage facilities in optimizing e-waste recovery. Waste Manag Res. 2017;35(4):395–402.

Downloads

Published

11-12-2025

How to Cite

[1]
“Cost Optimization for Electronic Waste Recovery in a Reverse Logistics Network”, EAI Endorsed Sust Man Ren Energy, vol. 2, no. 3, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.4108/eetsmre.9505.