Simultaneous Dual-Band Classification for WLAN Band Selection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eettti.10327Keywords:
Dual-band Wi-Fi, machine learning, signal classification, WLANAbstract
Accurate classification of dual-band Wi-Fi signals is essential for improving adaptive band selection and maintaining quality of service in complex indoor wireless environments. Although several efforts have addressed propagation modeling, only few works simultaneously examined dual-band classification across both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequencies in realistic scenarios. In this work, we use the measurements data conducted in the Deutsches Museum Bonn, which captures both line-of-sight (LoS) and non-LoS (NLoS) propagation conditions in a complex indoor environment. Ten statistical features are extracted from the received signal data, including mean, standard deviation, and skewness. To classify the signals, multiple machine learning models are evaluated, including k-nearest neighbors, support vector machines, and two deep learning architectures. Among these, model 3A, which is a fully connected neural network comprising three hidden layers using ReLU activation with 64, 32, and 16 neurons, respectively, and a softmax output layer, achieves the best performance. Trained with the Adam optimizer and categorical cross-entropy loss, model 3A attains an overall classification accuracy of 93 \% at the optimal window, thus outperforming the baseline models in terms of precision, recall, and F1-score across all classes. These results highlight the model’s robustness for simultaneous dual-band classification and its potential application in intelligent band selection for next generation Wi-Fi systems.
References
[1] Letaief KB, Shi Y, Lu J, Lu J. Edge Artificial Intelligence for 6G: Vision, Enabling Technologies, and Applications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. 2022 Jan;40(1):5-36.
[2] Rodrigues Dias Filgueiras H, Saia Lima E, Sêda Borsato Cunha M, De Souza Lopes CH, De Souza LC, Borges RM, et al. Wireless and Optical Convergent Access Technologies Toward 6G. IEEE Access. 2023;11:9232-59.
[3] Tataria H, Shafi M, Molisch AF, Dohler M, Sjöland H, Tufvesson F. 6GWireless Systems: Vision, Requirements, Challenges, Insights, and Opportunities. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2021;109(7):1166-99.
[4] Saad W, Bennis M, Chen M. A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Problems. IEEE Network. 2020;34(3):134-42.
[5] Rangan S, Rappaport TS, Erkip E. Millimeter-Wave Cellular Wireless Networks: Potentials and Challenges. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2014;102(3):366-85.
[6] Srinivasu PN, Ijaz MF, Shafi J,Woźniak M, Sujatha R. 6G Driven Fast Computational Networking Framework for Healthcare Applications. IEEE Access. 2022;10:94235-48.
[7] Naik G, Park JM, Ashdown J, Lehr W. Next Generation Wi-Fi and 5G NR-U in the 6 GHz Bands: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Access. 2020;8:153027-56.
[8] Shi Y, Enami R, Wensowitch J, Camp J. Measurementbased characterization of LOS and NLOS drone-toground channels. In: 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). Barcelona, Spain; 2018. p. 1-6.
[9] Sandoval O, David González G, Hämäläinen J, Yoo S. Indoor planning and optimization of LTE-U radio access over WiFi. In: 2016 IEEE 27th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC). Valencia, Spain; 2016. p. 1-7.
[10] Preusser K, Schmeink A. Robust Channel Modeling of 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Indoor Measurements: Empirical, Ray Tracing, and Artificial Neural Network Models. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. 2022;70(1):559-72.
[11] Fahem Majeed A, Arsat R, Ariff Baharudin M, Mu’Azzah Abdul Latiff N, Albaidhani A. AccurateMulticlass NLOS Channels Identification in UWB Indoor Positioning System-Based Deep Neural Network. IEEE Access.2024;12:179431-48.
[12] Zhang Z, Qingyang Hu R. Dense Cellular Network Analysis With LoS/NLoS Propagation and Bounded Path Loss Model. IEEE Communications Letters. 2018;22(11):2386-9.
[13] Huang L, Kumar S, Kuo CCJ. Adaptive resource allocation for multimedia QoS management in wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 2004;53(2):547-58.
[14] Duong D, Xu Y, David K. Comparing the Performance of Wi-Fi Fingerprinting Using the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Signals. In: 2018 IEEE 87th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring). Porto, Portugal; 2018. p. 1-5.
[15] Aboagye S, Amin Saeidi M, Tabassum H, Tayyar Y, Hossain E, Yang HC, et al. Multi-Band Wireless Communication Networks: Fundamentals, Challenges, and Resource Allocation. IEEE Transactions on Communications. 2024;72(7):4333-83.
[16] Pärssinen A. Multimode-multiband transceivers for next generation of wireless communications. In: 2011 Proceedings of the European Solid-State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC). Helsinki, Finland; 2011. p. 42-
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nana Esi Nyarko, Quang Nhat Le

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.