Metrics, Impact, and the Future of Pro-Poor Tourism: Towards a Theory-Driven Evaluation Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eettti.11411Keywords:
Pro-poor tourism, Social impact measurement, Social innovation, Empowerment, Social capitalAbstract
Pro-poor tourism has long been promoted as a mechanism for poverty alleviation through the integration of marginalised communities into tourism value chains. However, despite extensive policy uptake and academic interest, significant gaps remain in how the impacts of pro-poor tourism are evaluated, particularly in relation to social outcomes, empowerment, and long-term community change. The current paper argues that dominant evaluation approaches, which privilege short-term economic indicators such as income generation and employment, are insufficient to determine whether pro-poor tourism genuinely benefits poorer communities or contributes to meaningful social transformation. Drawing on theories of social innovation, empowerment, social capital, and social impact measurement, the paper critiques existing evaluation practices and highlights their conceptual and methodological limitations. In response, it proposes a theory-driven, multidimensional framework for evaluating pro-poor tourism that moves beyond narrow economic metrics to incorporate wellbeing, agency, participation in decision-making, improved digital inclusion and community cohesion. By positioning pro-poor tourism as a form of social innovation, the paper reframes impact measurement as both an evaluative and empowering process, capable of capturing complex social change over time, supported where possible by integrative digital tools. The proposed framework offers scholars, policymakers, development agencies, and tourism practitioners a more holistic and ethically grounded approach to understanding pro-poor tourism’s outcomes, thereby strengthening its potential as a tool for equitable and sustainable tourism development.
References
[1] Roe D, Urquhart P. Pro-Poor Tourism: Harnessing the World’s Largest Industry for the World’s Poor. London: International Institute for Environment and Development; 2001.
[2] Akrong KK. Pro-Poor Tourism: Critical Perspective and Implications for Future Research. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management. 2019;7(1):23-35.
[3] Wen S, Cai X, Li J. Pro-Poor Tourism and Local Practices: An Empirical Study of an Autonomous County in China. Sage Open. 2021;11(2).
[4] Suardana IW, Sudiarta IN. Impact of Tourism to Poverty in Tourism Destination: Pro-Poor Tourism Management Approach. Journal of Business on Hospitality and Tourism. 2016;2(1):81-91.
[5] Hazenberg R, Bui LAP, Tran TML. Pro-Poor Tourism as a Mechanism of Social Innovation and Empowerment. EAI Endorsed Tourism, Technology and Intelligence. 2025;2(1).
[6] Ashley C, Roe D. Making tourism work for the poor: Strategies and challenges in southern Africa. Development Southern Africa. 2002;19(1):61-82.
[7] Ashley C, Roe D, Goodwin H. Pro-poor tourism strategies: Making tourism work for the poor. London: ODI; 2001.
[8] Chok S, Macbeth J, Warren C. Tourism as a tool for poverty alleviation: A critical analysis. Tourism Management. 2007;28(2):474-485.
[9] Hall CM. Pro-poor tourism: Who benefits? Perspectives on Tourism. 2007;45(1):1-8.
[10] Hazenberg R, Paterson-Young C. Social Impact Measurement for a Sustainable Future: The Power of Aesthetics and Practical Implications. Northampton: Palgrave Macmillan; 2021.
[11] Mitchell J, Ashley C. Tourism and poverty reduction: Pathways to prosperity. London: Earthscan; 2010.
[12] Goodwin H. Tourism, local economic development, and poverty reduction. Applied Research in Economic Development. 2008;5(3):55-64.
[13] Chambers R. Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications; 1997.
[14] Hampton MP. Heritage, local communities and economic development. Annals of Tourism Research. 2005;32(3):735-759.
[15] Scheyvens R. Exploring the tourism-poverty nexus. Current Issues in Tourism. 2007;10(2–3):231-254.
[16] Scheyvens R. Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities. Tourism Management. 1999;20(2):245-249.
[17] Mulgan G. Social innovation: How societies find the power to change. Bristol: Policy Press; 2019.
[18] Moulaert F, Martinelli F, Swyngedouw E, González S. The international handbook on social innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2013.
[19] Sairinen R, Kumpulainen S. Assessing social impacts in urban waterfront regeneration. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2006;26(1):120-135.
[20] Paterson-Young C, Bajwa-Patel M, Hazenberg R. The Social Impact of Custody on Young People in The Criminal Justice System. London: Palgrave; 2019.
[21] Clifford J, Hehenberger L, Fantini M. Proposed Approaches to Social Impact Measurement in European Commission legislation and in practice relating to: EuSEFs and the EaSI. European Commission Report 140605; 2014.
[22] McLoughlin J, Kaminski J, Sodagar B, Khan S, Harris R, Arnaudo G, et al. A strategic approach to social impact measurement of social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal. 2009;5(2):154-178.
[23] Maher M, Karlidag-Dennis E. “I’d look at it differently if I wasn’t a project manager”: The Impact of formality and accountability in educational outreach programmes. Journal of Education and Work. 2022;35(3).
[24] Hiruy K, Elmes A, Qian-Khoo J, Joyce A, Barraket J. Placing People at the Centre of Social Impact Measurement: Current Approaches, Challenges and Future Directions. In: Hazenberg R, Paterson-Young C, editors. Social Impact Measurement for a Sustainable Future. Northampton: Palgrave Macmillan; 2021.
[25] Hooper LO. Impact and Gender: Agency and Capability in Empowering Women in Kenya. In: Hazenberg R, Paterson-Young C, editors. Social Impact Measurement for a Sustainable Future. Northampton: Palgrave Macmillan; 2021.
[26] Hall K, Kinghorn P. Measuring Outcomes in Social Care. In: Hazenberg R, Paterson-Young C, editors. Social Impact Measurement for a Sustainable Future. Northampton: Palgrave Macmillan; 2021.
[27] Zimmerman MA. Empowerment theory. In: Rappaport J, Seidman E, editors. Handbook of community psychology. New York: Springer; 2000. p. 43-63.
[28] Rogerson CM. Tourism–agriculture linkages in rural South Africa. Applied Geography. 2012;32(2):56-63.
[29] Cole S. Information and empowerment: The keys to achieving sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2006;14(6):629-644.
[30] Ali A, Frew AJ. ICT and sustainable tourism development: an innovative perspective. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology. 2014;5(1):2-16.
[31] Zeqiri A, Ben Youssef A, Maherzi Zahar T. The Role of Digital Tourism Platforms in Advancing Sustainable Development Goals in the Industry 4.0 Era. Sustainability. 2025;17(8):3482.
[32] Elsawy TM. Harnessing appreciative inquiry in tourism planning: towards a strategy for poverty alleviation in marginalised communities. International Journal of Tourism Cities. 2024;10(3):925-956.
[33] Minghetti V, Buhalis D. Digital Divide in Tourism. Journal of Travel Research. 2009;49(3):267-281.
[34] Gretzel U, Fuchs M, Baggio R, et al. e-Tourism beyond COVID-19: a call for transformative research. Inf Technol Tourism. 2020;22:187-203.
[35] Buhalis D, Zoge M. The Strategic Impact of the Internet on the Tourism Industry. In: Sigala M, Mich L, Murphy J, editors. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2007. Vienna: Springer; 2007.
[36] Spencer A. ICT and Caribbean Tourism. In: Travel and Tourism in the Caribbean. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019.
[37] Gretzel U, Koo C. Smart tourism cities: a duality of place where technology supports the convergence of touristic and residential experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research. 2021;26(4):352-364.
[38] Ivars-Baidal J, Casado-Díaz AB, Navarro-Ruiz S, Fuster-Uguet M. Smart tourism city governance: exploring the impact on stakeholder networks. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2024;36(2):582-601.
[39] Hazenberg R, Paterson-Young C. The Development of Social Impact Measurement. In: Hazenberg R, Paterson-Young C, editors. Social Impact Measurement for a Sustainable Future. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2022.
[40] Kamble PA, Mehta A, Rani N. Measuring Multidimensional Financial Resilience: An Ex-ante Approach. Soc Indic Res. 2025;176:533-567.
[41] Chen Y, Zhang N, Cheng X. The spillover effects of online tourism platforms on sustainable development. Information Systems Journal. 2024;34(3):788-827.
[42] Liu Y, Yu J. Path dependence in pro-poor tourism. Environ Dev Sustain. 2022;24:973-993.
[43] Tao T, Wall G. Tourism as a sustainable livelihood strategy. Tourism Management. 2009;30(1):90-98.
[44] Shen F, Hughey KFD, Simmons DG. Connecting the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach and Tourism: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2008;15(1):19-31.
[45] Putnam R. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2000.
[46] Reason P, Bradbury H. The SAGE handbook of action research. London: Sage; 2008.
[47] Ayob N, Teasdale S, Fagan K. How social innovation “came to be”: tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy. 2016;45(4):635-53.
[48] Kindon S, Pain R, Kesby M. Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. London: Routledge; 2007.
[49] Okazaki E. A community-based tourism model: Its conception and use. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2008;16(5):511-529.
[50] Zapata MJ, Hall CM, Lindo P, Vanderschaeghe M. Can community-based tourism contribute to development and poverty alleviation? Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2011;19(6):725-749.
[51] Cousins JB, Whitmore E. Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation. 1998;1998(80):5-23.
[52] Guijt I. Participatory approaches. Methodological Briefs Impact Evaluation No. 5. UNICEF; 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Richard Hazenberg, Phuong Bui Le Anh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.
