PennyLane–Qiskit Plugin: A Protocol for Integrating Noisy, Fake, and Real Quantum Backends
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4108/eettti.12288Keywords:
Hybrid quantum–classical computing, noisy quantum simulation, PennyLane–Qiskit plugin, quantum hardware backends, quantum machine learningAbstract
Quantum computing frameworks like PennyLane, Qiskit, and others offer powerful tools for developing quantum algorithms. However, integrating their devices can be challenging for newcomers, especially given the frequent updates in frameworks like Qiskit, which can create significant barriers to learning and thus slow down the growth of quantum computing and quantum machine learning. The PennyLane–Qiskit plugin is a particularly interesting framework that allows researchers and practitioners interested in quantum computing and quantum machine learning to implement and simulate realistic models in a simple and efficient way. This work provides a practical method to use the PennyLane–Qiskit plugin, focusing on three main device types: the Aer simulator with noise models, IBM fake backends (with FakeManilaV2 as a representative example), and real IBM Quantum hardware accessed remotely (with ibm_torino used in this study). We demonstrate how to set up and use each of these devices within PennyLane using a simple example of a quantum machine learning regression task on simulated stock price data. Our goal is to simplify the process for all interested users, especially (but not only) beginners by clearly explaining and demonstrating how to use each of these device options while highlighting best practices for effectively leveraging PennyLane and Qiskit together via Pennylane–Qiskit plugin. This work aims to provide a turnkey solution enabling users with only minimal foundational knowledge to quickly start running meaningful simulations. The three devices implementation will be explained with the code here. The accompanying full code will be provided to ensure that all results can be easily reproduced, including with users’ own datasets.
References
[1] D. Herman, C. Googin, X. Liu, Y. Sun, A. Galda, I. Safro, M. Pistoia, and Y. Alexeev, “Quantum computing for finance,” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 5, pp. 450–465, Jul. 2023.
[2] S. Lee, J. Lee, H. Zhai, Y. Tong, A. M. Dalzell, A. Kumar, P. Helms, J. Gray, Z.-H. Cui, W. Liu, M. Kastoryano, R. Babbush, J. Preskill, D. R. Reichman, E. T. Campbell, E. F. Valeev, L. Lin, and G. K.-L. Chan, “Evaluating the evidence for exponential quantum advantage in groundstate quantum chemistry,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, p. 1952, Apr. 2023.
[3] R. Ur Rasool, H. F. Ahmad, W. Rafique, A. Qayyum, J. Qadir, and Z. Anwar, “Quantum computing for healthcare: a review,” Future Internet, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 94, Feb. 2023.
[4] S. K. Subramani, M. Selvi, and S. Svn, “Review of security methods based on classical cryptography and quantum cryptography,” Cybernetics and Systems, pp. 302–320, Jan. 2023.
[5] F. Tennie and T. N. Palmer, “Quantum computers for weather and climate prediction: the good, the bad, and the noisy,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 488–500, Feb. 2023.
[6] M. Broughton, G. Verdon, T. McCourt, A. J. Martinez, J. H. Yoo, S. V. Isakov, P. Massey, R. Halavati, M. Y. Niu, A. Zlokapa, E. Peters, O. Lockwood, A. Skolik, S. Jerbi, V. Dunjko, M. Leib, M. Streif, D. Von Dollen, H. Chen, S. Cao, R. Wiersema, H.-Y. Huang, J. R. McClean, R. Babbush, S. Boixo, D. Bacon, A. K. Ho, H. Neven, and M. Mohseni, “Tensorflow quantum: A software framework for quantum machine learning,” ArXiv preprint arXiv:2003.02989, Mar. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.02989
[7] K. Svore, A. Geller, M. Troyer, J. Azariah, C. Granade, B. Heim, V. Kliuchnikov, M. Mykhailova, A. Paz, and M. Roetteler, “Q#: Enabling scalable quantum computing and development with a high-level dsl,” in Proceedings of the Real World Domain Specific Languages Workshop (RWDSL), no. 7. ACM, Feb. 2018, pp. 1–10.
[8] V. Bergholm, J. Izaac, M. Schuld, C. Gogolin, N. Killoran, and C. Weedbrook, “Pennylane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04968, Nov. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.04968
[9] S. Shapiro, “Hybrid quantum-classical machine learning with pennylane: A comprehensive guide for computational research,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.14786, Nov. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.14786
[10] A. Javadi-Abhari, M. Treinish, K. Krsulich, C. J.Wood, J. Lishman, J. Gacon, S. Martiel, P. D. Nation,L. S. Bishop, A. W. Cross, B. R. Johnson, andJ. M. Gambetta, “Quantum computing with qiskit,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08810, May 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08810
[11] M. E. Sahin, E. Altamura, O. Wallis, S. P. Wood, A. Dekusar, D. A. Millar, T. Imamichi, A. Matsuo, and S. Mensa, “Qiskit machine learning: an opensource library for quantum machine learning tasks at scale on quantum hardware and classical simulators,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17756, May 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17756
[12] J. C. Hull, Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 10th ed. Pearson, 2018.
[13] P. Wilmott, Paul Wilmott on Quantitative Finance. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Matthieu Hubert, Quang Nhat Le, Emmanuel Haven

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.